Canada -
News Sections
Mayor says he misspoke on light rail 'affordability'
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
ctvottawa.ca
Date: Fri. Jun. 4 2010 6:23 PM ET
Mayor Larry O'Brien said he should have chosen his words more carefully when discussing the light rail project, adding the word "affordability" was the wrong word to use.
O'Brien told CTV that he worried a multi-million dollar rail plan wasn't affordable -- and then retracted his statement in an interview later on Friday.
He added that the city treasurer has ensured him that the project is an affordable plan for the City of Ottawa.
The mayor says he wasn't raising concerns about whether the project is affordable; rather he wanted to say that the detailed costs of the project will need to be reviewed by the next city council after a procurement process is established.
"I think this is the first seed of doubt he's cast," said mayoral candidate Jim Watson, a one-time mayor of Ottawa himself.
"If we only have $1.8 billion in funding and we have a plan that's $2.1 billion - anyone can do the math - we are already $300 million short, and that's even before tenders go out. So i suspect we are going to see a shortfall of over $300 million."
'Affordability'
Earlier today, O'Brien told CTV Ottawa the next council will need to determine if the light rail plan is an affordable choice for the city.
"Now that we have the money funding envelope together, we can go out and get some quotes and we can find out whether it is really affordable and those quotes will come back early in the next term, so we're not going to try to ramrod this thing through before the end of this term," O'Brien said Friday morning.
"We'll get through the official process of tendering, we'll get the numbers. A new council will be able to ascertain at that time about the issue of affordability, but we'll take it a long way and give the new council some exciting work to do."
The mayor added the city needs to proceed with the project, given its importance to the future of the capital.
"The question shouldn't be: can we afford to? It should be: can we afford not to?" O'Brien said.
Federal funding
The mayor made those comments Friday morning after the federal government confirmed its share of funding for the first phase of the $2.1-billion project is imminent.
Sources told CTV Ottawa the federal government will make its funding announcement late next week.
"It's a big, big, big project. It's a lot of money, but the city's a big city, it's a big government and they have to make big decisions," said Transport Minister John Baird.
When asked if the project is a good plan for the City of Ottawa, Baird said: "I'll let the city council take care of that. My job as a federal MP, as a federal minister, is to be a funding partner and that's what I'm committed to do."
Council voted 19-4 to approve the functional design of the project and move forward with an environmental assessment in January 2010.
The cost of the first phase has already ballooned from an original estimate of $1.4 billion to $2.1 billion. It includes building a transit tunnel through the city's downtown core, as well as laying light rail tracks from Blair Road to Tunney's Pasture.
The Ontario government committed its share of $600 million in funding late last year. The federal government is expected to match the provincial funding. So far, the federal government has committed $200 million to the project.
With files from CTV Ottawa's Kate Eggins and John Ruttle
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Libbe
said
Swan
said
Dennis R
said
As I recall Toronto wanted nothing to do with it nor the Feds and the City Council just like to day couldn't make up their minds on the issue as all three are more concerned with getting re-elected than doing their jobs and perhaps getting some folks upset with them.
My prediction is we will never get it dome now just like we couldn't get it done in the past and the bigest draw back is the people they want it but only if they can get it for peanuts, they want fast, regular transit but only for nothing, they want to clean up our air quality but only if it's free, well folks that aint a gona happen, we truly need this LRT system and as much as possible under ground out of the weather (snow, ice and such) so let's geter dune.
A Hammer doesn't cost $2000
said
I imagine that the suppliers of the LRT would love to make as much money as possible. They'll try to stick it to us. Competitive Bids would be a good way to go on this.
Travis
said
Larry and city council do it again. Bravo!
Just wait for the cost overruns, and major mistakes start to show up.
Cliff
said
These guys(and gals) used to get 10k a year and a small travel allowance (C. 1960). If you look at Stats Canada figures on inflation, these people have far,far outraced inflation in 50 years! They have argued that if us taxpayers don't pay them more, we won't get good candidatea. With the crap we've seen coming out of the modern politicians mouths, I'd rather see some of the ones we used to get for a lot less come back.
Davidson
said
The mayor has been pushing for the transit plan all along. Are we surprised that he speaks off the cuff? I'm not. I'm sure he's thinking about how to make this work, from cash to political fallout.
Personally, I think he should stay the course and not worry about opportunists like Watson. That guy's nothing more than a gladhander. At least O'Brien is less skilled at bullshitting us.
I'm stickin' with the no bullshit, sometimes misspeaking, mayor. Call me nuts, but I don't want slick. I want real.
Martin
said
He can make a decision.
Avid News Follower
said
reidjr
said
As for the g20 don't forget that is for both conferences not just one.As for $700 billion for the size of the lrt ottawa wants yes thats about right.
A Hammer doesn't cost $2000
said
Well...you don;t really believe it costs $933B for a G20 conference, or $700B for an LRT?
You know that someone is getting a buckeload of cash somewhere, and it isn't you and me, though we will see it as it leaves our pockets, if only briefly.
All our levels of government are socking away billions for a rainy day, and given the number lately, it may rain for 40 days and 40 nights, before the sewers backup.
Oh, and ever see how trains and streetcars run when it snows...yeh...not at all. If they don't do the tunnel, just like in other cities that have taken a pass on the tunnel, be prepared to see that LRT stuck or derailed, every time it snows, and even sometimes when it gets really hot for some reason??
Reener
said
Quite frankly the only thing keeping downtown alive these days is the Federal government, and they'll never allow teleworking to the extent that private sector allows it because their unions would have a hissy fit if their entire middle management, whose only job is to babysit, disappeared.
I like the Baird quote too: When asked if the project is a good plan for the City of Ottawa, Baird said: "I'll let the city council take care of that. My job as a federal MP, as a federal minister, is to be a funding partner and that's what I'm committed to do." You certainly didn't hesitate to stick your nose in last time when your buddy Larry asked you to, why the hands-off approach this time?
Joe
said
Here we go again.
Dont sign any contract until after the election or taxpayers will consider it fraud."
The intelligent ones wouldn't. Are you even aware of what the term "fruad" means?
tobee
said
Same Old, Same Results
said
It occurs to me that we have been the stupid ones. We sent O'Brien up there to make changes, and then we stupidly sent the other 23 original people, many of whom caused these problems back there for him to work with on City Council.
There is a saying, and it goes like this....
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting s different result.
I mean HELLO! If we want change next time, we better be ready to change a majority of those 23 Councillors. If we..you don't, then you are sentencing all of us to the same old same old, for another 4 years.
If you don't want that, vote for some other candidate than you did last time.
Sweep sweep...changes are coming to a council near you.
Joeli Stanford
said
Now he says they need to slow down and pass this on to yet another council.
Where is the leadership?
glenn
said
Dont sign any contract until after the election or taxpayers will consider it fraud.
Steven
said
valerie
said
Dig Deep FEDS. This is YOUR PROJECT
said
So if you FEDS want your employees at work on time, better dig deep for funds. This is really YOUR project.
DIG DEEP JOHN Baird. Really Deep.
Lex from the West
said
happy Canadian
said
This is an essential service. We want people using public transit. We need to clean up the downtown core.
Enough second (or eighth) guessing. Time to get 'er done!
4 years ago this council cancelled an approved plan, and instituted their own. 4 years and still not even started.
Stick to your decisions, move it forward.
Council needs to grow some cojones!
Frank
said
I say wait until after the next municipal election so we can get rid of the big spenders like Doucet and Cullen and bring in a REALISTIC transit plan.