Canada -   

1
A two-storey, 1,600-square-foot home for sale is seen in the Kitsilano area of Vancouver, Thursday, April 8, 2010. (Jonathan Hayward / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

New mortgage rules kick in amidst hot housing market

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Richard Madan on the changes
Tougher mortgage rules kicked in today, changing the limits on how much money prospective home buyers can borrow. The federal government's goal is to make sure Canadians don't spend more than they can afford.
CTV News Channel: Amparo Cardenas, broker
Cardenas says first-time home buyers and people trying to buy rental properties will have a hard time due to the new changes made to mortage rules. These new rule changes are said to protect consumers.
CTV News Channel: Alan Silverstein, lawyer
Mortgage changes are designed to ensure people are buying homes they can afford, and a real estate lawyer and author of several books on real estate says people will need bigger down payments and anyone who is pre-approved will need to go through the process again.
Canada AM: Paula Roberts, mortgage broker
A mortgage broker explain how new tighter mortgage rules are meant to discourage homeowners from taking out mortgages they might not be able to afford as interest rates start to rise and return to more normal levels.
CTV News Channel: Peter Kinch, mortgage expert
A mortgage and housing expert discusses the changes to Canada's new housing rules set to take effect Monday. Kinch says the premise of the changes comes from possible overheating of the housing market.
CTV News Channel: Amparo Cardenas, consultant
A mortgage consultant explains how the new mortgage rules that force borrowers to meet the standards for a five-year, fixed-rate mortgage is a way to protect consumers in the long run.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (24) Facebook   

A two-storey, 1,600-square-foot home for sale is seen in the Kitsilano area of Vancouver, Thursday, April 8, 2010. (Jonathan Hayward / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Photos

A two-storey, 1,600-square-foot home for sale is seen in the Kitsilano area of Vancouver, Thursday, April 8, 2010. (Jonathan Hayward / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Apr. 19 2010 8:49 PM ET

Tougher mortgage rules come into effect Monday, though experts say that the incoming changes have done little to cool a thriving national housing market.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced in February that Ottawa was bringing in new rules to ensure that new homebuyers would be able to afford their mortgages as interest rates rise in the coming months.

Flaherty said the government was acting to prevent a future housing bubble, though he said there was "no evidence" to suggest one was developing. At the time, he characterized the Canadian housing market as being "healthy and stable" with about two-thirds of Canadians owning their own homes.

Paula Roberts, a Toronto-area mortgage banker, said the key is to have homebuyers in a position where they can comfortably withstand an increase in interest rates.

"Nobody wants to get anybody into a house -- they love their house, they love the mortgage, they qualify and all of a sudden rates go up and they can't afford it," Roberts told CTV's Canada AM during an interview in Toronto on Monday morning.

Under the new rules, homeowners are now required to meet the standards of a five-year, fixed-rate loan even if they choose a variable-rate mortgage or a shorter-term arrangement.

Additionally, Ottawa put a limit on the amount of refinancing that homeowners can undertake, dropping the maximum to 90 per cent of the value of their home, down from 95 per cent under the previous rules.

For investors, the government will now require a 20 per cent down payment for non-owner-occupied properties, if they wish to qualify for government-backed insurance.

Hot market amid new rules

The rules come into effect today, but experts say that they haven't slowed down buyers since Flaherty announced the new rules and mortgage rates jumped nearly three-quarters of a point in the interim.

The Canadian Real Estate Association said almost 100,000 houses went up for sale last month, beating the previous monthly record by nearly 20 per cent.

Marcus Caporicci, a London, Ont., real estate agent, told The Canadian Press that many homebuyers have entered the market with the intent of making a purchase before the rules get tougher.

Furthermore, Caporicci said the effect of making it harder for people to obtain mortgages, is that "creative financing will become increasingly popular."

That could include loans from family, or the use of credit to make the 5 per cent down payment that is necessary to obtain a mortgage, Caporicci said.

But other real estate professionals say the changes were already in step with what private mortgage companies and banks are doing.

Martin Reid, the president of mortgage banker Home Trust, said most people will be unaffected by the new rules.

"There will be some people around the fringe that are impacted by it, but I don't think it's a huge negative impact to the real estate market," Reid told The Canadian Press from Toronto.

Peter Kinch, a mortgage and housing expert, agreed that the new mortgage rules effect only a minority of buyers in each case. As a result, he expects the incoming rules will have minimal effect on Canadian housing prices.

"In the big picture, it will impact those who are in the fringe and those who potentially could have gotten into trouble, but, at the end of the day, it's not going to have a huge impact of cooling off housing prices," he told CTV News Channel on Monday morning.

"I don't think we're going to see a major impact on housing prices at all."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Nolan Moore
said

Tyrone, assumable mortgages are good, but BUYER BE WARE, as also SELLER BE WARE. If the new owner defaults, the original owner is on the hook. As a real estate appraiser, I've seen this happen way too often. They assume, collect rent for a few months then disappear.


Edm Vic
said

Dear Craig from NS; Please think about what you said because if i remeber correctly it was the Liberals that wanted to do that and the NDP & Conservatives said no. Try to get your facts right next time!


Millicent Wendy
said

Oh come on get real! Nobody these days has 20% to throw down. The political class in this country is out to lunch and they aren't lunching with the "real" people. We have a government bureaucracy that thinks nothing of wasting tax payer's money with stupid social programs that aren't accountable fiscally and every time there's a government scandal they waste more tax payer's money with their B.S. "Royal Commissions" which are just "make-work" projects for unemployed political elites given a quick 100,000 bucks to pontificate and lecture us with their findings on something anyone with any common sense could tell you for free.This country is run by idiots in all political parties and we need to collectively hold them all accountable because they are taking our disposable income so we don't have the freedom anymore to live as good as they do. A man's house is suppose to be his castle yet all most Canadians can afford these days is a tent. And yes they'll tax you for that too!


Justin
said

Who the hell has "20%" to put down on an "over-inflated" housing market these days??? The career government elite leeches all live in "La La Land" thinking "us" ordinary taxpaying Canadians have any "real" cash anymore after they've taxed us to death in their "socialist Utopia on Steroids". Plus they've been complicit in letting corporations (that get subsidies and state welfare from Canadian taxpayers) ship our good "mid-class-decent paying" jobs overseas to Communist China. So where do these loud-mouthed big shots propose we get the funds to by our little dream home these days? Not all of us can be career political elites leeching off the little guy living on champagne dreams with the Canadian public's beer wages. What the hell is happening to this world and why do we all just sit like dolts letting them run rough shot all over us? Wake up!


Keith in Brampton
said

@ Matt: With the cost of housing these days, both rental and prchase, it would be VERY difficult for most first-time purchasers to enter the market if a 20% down payment were required. We bought our first home 16 years ago with 5% down; if we'd been required to pay rent AND save for a 20% down payment, with ever-climbing real estate prices we'd be lucky if we had the 20% even now. What is REALLY needed is more prudent analyses on what potential buyers can actually afford (if we had taken everything the bank was willing to give us we'd have lost whatever we bought fairly quickly). The banks, realtors - and society generally - set up false expectations that greedy &/or less sophisticated buyers jump at, and wind up in over their heads. This new rule is a good start.


The Truth Hurts Blind Liberals
said

@ Reece You have been reading too much Liberal propaganda. The Conservatives actually the first to licence Chartered banks and limit foreign ownership. They also estabished the early rules that banks could not loan more than 75% of the value of a property unless it is insured. They established Canada Mortgage and Housing that insures mortgages. The conservatives invented Canadian depositors Insurance and increaded it during the melt down to keep confidence. The conservatives designed the reporting rules. With CMHC they established the 38% debt service ratio rule, they estabished. Reece I am sure you beleive the Liberal propaganda but the fact is the Conservatives also allowed women the vote, had the first female member of parliment, The Conservatives got the blacks the vote in South Africa, Conservatives brought schools to girls in Afganistan. The fact is Liberals have never accomplished anything for the country a few fringe groups of liberal activists that working conservatives pay for yes.


Kim
said

Liberal Paul Martin made our banks strong, if Harper would have had his way we would be in the same shape as the US.


Brian In Sarnia
said

yup. agreed with many. this has nothing to do with Harper. In fact, sadly, this has more to do with the Libs and NDP holding true to form. So for the cons hoping to take credit.... check your platform... oh wait... four years and still don't have one. nevermind.


Vince M
said

Reece said: "which regulation did Harper pass that you believe helped Canadian banks? Yeah, none." Actually there are plenty. Try googling it.


Vince M
said

Angry Customer. Maybe if you knew how bank rates go up independantly of the BoC rate you won't be so "angry". Banks finance fixed-rate mortgages by selling bonds to investors, then take the proceeds and give it to us as mortgages. They have to price the bonds so investors will buy them. If investors can get more for their money in other investments then the bonds have to raise their dividends to compete. When those go up your fixed rate goes up - which is what you are seeing right now. That has nothing to do with the BoC rate. The Boc rate is used to set variable rate mortgages, which have not moved recently, and won't move until the BoC raises their rate in summer.


Vince M
said

Deregulation in the U.S. was VERY different than proposed deregulation in Canada. Deregulating banks in Canada was all about one bank being able to merge with another, not about allowing fancy financing in subprime mortgages. Apart from that, people here think re-examing banking regulations in Canada is a bad thing. No so. Stupid regulations should always be removed. For example, why is it that a bank in Canada can only offer Visa or Mastercard but not both? It impacts the small businessman who has to open (and pay for) two bank accounts in two different banks if they want to process Visa and MC. Another example: it used to be you needed a guarantor such as a priest or police officer to open a chequing account... aren't you glad we deregulated that dumb rule?


joe
said

Reece is right!


Banker
said

@ Joe Harper, Mulroney and Deiffenbaker are the real reason we have strong banks. All Paul Martin ever did was cut transfer payments to Ontario. He was always more pre-occupied with running his shipping company and looking after his own interests as it seems the company got $160 million of Canadian tax payers dollars but the company pays no tax as he registered the ships off shore. Paul Martin will try and take credit for anything except adscam that happened under his watch as Finance Minister. The Liberal fairytales your trying to promote are not credible.


Reece
said

@TYLER "Prime Minister Harper has done a good job in giving us strong stable banks that turns the peaks and valley's in the economy into rolling hills." - - - Assuming you are knowledgeable, you must know what you just said simply is not true. Even Harper himself would never claim that his leadership is what kept our banks safe. He simply says that Canada has good fundementals that is a source of envy of other nations in regards to our banks. If you remember, it was PM Chretien´s actions in the 1990´s that kept our banks from integrating with foreign banks. Conservatives in the 1990´s were mocking our banks as being small and lacking in influence. The conservatives lobbied hard to deregulate our banks but got no where with Chretien. It´s all on record. Besides, which regulation did Harper pass that you believe helped Canadian banks? Yeah, none.


reece
said

I´m happy with this new rule. There are people who line up to buy their 5th Rental home and use the rent that they are proposing to charge as "income"....this leaves the rest of us looking for our first homes out in the cold. Most of the homes I see available in my price range are simply not worth buying and the apartments that are now being offered up are tiny little cages. I can not appreciate how anybody can work 8 hours a day in an office cubical only to go toanother cubical called their home. This isn´t what I had in mind yet it is the only thing that is available in my price range unless I want to find something more reasonably priced east of Vancouver. These new laws will bring down the price of homes, that and the increase in interest rates. These realtors and mortgage brokers keep cheerleading the price of homes upwards but they are only lining their own pockets and in 5 years time when the market implodes we´ll have people who have a negative net wortth or walking away from their devalued homes dragging everybody elses equity down with them.


Craig from NS
said

Canada's banks are only strong because Harper has a minority government. Before the bubble burst they wanted to deregulate the banks and the opposition wouldn't let them. Then comes the economic crisis and they take credit for a strong banking system in Canada. I'm no Liberal or NDP supporter as I don't like any of the leaders, but at least they held the line.

Davinder in Brampton
said

Iggy position on this is he is for it and against it. But may settle on being against anything the Conservatives are for as he doesn't stand for anything. He never taught finance or accounting at Harvard. If he was good enough teacher to get tenure as a Professor I think he would still be there.


Adele Underwood Retired
said

Harper has made our banking system the envy of the world. So other countries are starting to copy the wisdom of Harper but financial reform takes time.


joe
said

Harper had nothing to do with the stability of our banks. Thank Paul Martin.


Matt
said

I agree with many of these changes. Personally I think people should require a 20% down payment before being eligible for a mortgage. The more of your own money you have invested the harder it will be to simply "walk away".... I also agree that banks should not be able to charge such huge penalties for refinancing or paying out a mortgage. Of course there will be no new rules for them as that would cut into the profits too heavily.


JP
said

In all the time the REGREESIVE CONSERTAVIESbeen in power this is the ONLY THING they have done right


Tyler in Moosejaw, Sask
said

Prime Minister Harper has done a good job in giving us strong stable banks that turns the peaks and valley's in the economy into rolling hills. I like Harpers new rules on bank bonuses they must be paid out over 3 yrs so if it turns out the profits are smoke and mirrors made on bad paper the rest of the bonus money can be stopped. We do not want a repeat of the American sub-prime mess where banks gave out loans to unemployed people nothing down and showed huge profits and took hundred of millions in profits.


Angry Customer
said

Chartered banks put up rates before the Bank of Canada did so the Banks cost of borrowing never went up but the borrows cost went up. 30 Million people in this country and they all make billions, who do they get those profits from? Underpaid workers and overcharged customers.


Tyrone: Banks are VLT machines
said

The banks are just a big computer system like a VLT machine programmed to screw people. Purchasers should be able to assume mortgages without quailifying without the vendors being on the hook after one year. The bank just wants to bilk more from new purchasers. The payout penalities are obsene in some cases and the small cartel of the 5 banks are screw everyone together on the payout penalties when a house sells or needs to be refinanced and the bank provides no service and nothing in return to screw people on payout penalties. The government should ease up the rules on assumptions and they should limit the amount of penalties. The banks make billions and the new rules protect the banks we need some banking rules to protect the consumers.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Question Period on Sunday, May 27, 2012.

Raitt: Ottawa prepared to step into CP Rail dispute

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

Pedro Gonzalez bangs his pot in support of the growing protest movement that started against tuition fee hikes in Montreal, Friday, May 25, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Focus of Quebec protests swells beyond tuition hikes

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

O'Neil King is pictured in this undated handout photo from Peel Regional Police.

Brampton, Ont. man arrested on Canada-wide warrant

More

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges