Canada -
News Sections
Women outnumber men in Canadian workforce
The Canadian Press
Date: Saturday Sep. 5, 2009 6:44 PM ET
TORONTO Women labour leaders say there's a "dark side" to Statistics Canada figures suggesting that for the first time in history there are more women than men in Canada's workforce.
A recently issued labour force survey found that about 7.1 million women were in paid employment during the first half of 2009, compared to 6.9 million men.
Women outnumbered men in both the "under 25 years" and the "25 years and over" demographics.
The figures are not a reflection of gains in female-dominated industries, but of layoffs and cutbacks in male-dominated industries, such as the beleaguered manufacturing and natural resources sectors, said labour leaders in the auto and nursing sector.
"Nobody should break out the champagne here," said Laurell Ritchie, a national representative with the Canadian Auto Workers' union. "There is a dark side to this story."
In the past year, employment among women has risen by 0.6 per cent, while men's employment has fallen by 1.7 per cent in the same period, the report indicates.
"Men are losing jobs, they're unemployed, they're taking early retirement, when that may not have been their original plan, or moving into self-employment," Ritchie said.
"With women, there has been some increase in some areas of the service sector, like healthcare, and women predominate in those jobs."
Ritchie said she was reviewing the report and noticed something she had never seen before--that there were more women in paid employment than men.
She called Statistics Canada and got the numbers confirmed.
But the study's figures do not include Canadians who are self-employed or unemployed who are actively seeking jobs.
Women are taking part-time and any work they can get, to put food on the table for their families, said Lesley Bell, a registered nurse and CEO of the Ontario Nurses' Association.
"Women are only paid 71 cents on the dollar in relation to men so they're cheaper costs," Bell, whose association is 98 per cent women, said. "Women are getting more work, but at a much lower rate usually."
Still the employment numbers are a milestone, Ritchie said, who can recall the days when women were not taken seriously as "real workers."
"Clearly, we passed that milestone with these new figures out there. Women are very significant players in the labour market."
Bell said the silver lining is that at least more women in the labour force means more women are getting recognition for the work they're doing. "Many hours of women's work is never recognized," she added.
"It's good to see more women getting more jobs,"Bell said. "Hopefully, eventually they'll get equal pay, too."
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Marty
0
said
0
And lastly to "Freed Man," your comments are accusatory towards women, suggesting men have had enough of supporting us women. And to quote you "Increasingly, young men have learned from the experience of their fathers, and are opting out of marriage." I may add that the mothers were at home cooking, cleaning, giving birth, and doing everything else so the man could go to work and come home and sit on his butt. For the sake of all of us women out there- please stay "free".
KC
0
said
0
The choice to stay home and raise your children (woman or man) has become obsolete in this economy. Traditionally, women were the primary caregivers and thier jobs were to stay home and work for the sake of thier children. I do not find this offensive because having recently had a child, I would love nothing more than to stay home and provide for my child's upbringing and well being. This is simply not affordable, even when the choice exists for the man to stay home and raise the family. Therefore, there will be a larger amount of women (and some cases men) entering the workforce because our society has placed more value in money rather than investing in the lives of our children.
Freed Man
0
said
0
Concert Promoter has a point. The idea that women earn only 70% of what men make is a feminist myth, based on outdated research and biased methodology.
Men tend to hold very high-paying executive positions, careers that take years of service to a company to achieve. The exorbitant salaries paid to these executives distorts the entire wage-gap picture.
Many women, as qualified as they are, often decide to opt out of the workplace to have children. This puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to moving up the corporate ladder. This may not be fair, but it explains much of the wage gap.
Further, women tend to work fewer hours than men, and so although their net pay is lower, it's based on an unfair comparison. And until quite recently, men tended to have more education, again exacerbating the supposed "gap".
Studies taking these factors into account show the "gap" between men and women's wages is much narrower, depending on the job.
In reality, there are several professions where females earn more than their male counterparts. Women lawyers, for example, now make more than man lawyers in many places.
And with more women earning advanced degrees and having the cash to become single mothers, hopefully they are able to move up the corporate ladder at a faster rate than women in previous generations, without having husbands or relationships to hold them back.
Of course, what this means for our culture is unclear. Children raised without fathers, particularly girls, tend to use drugs and have sex earlier than their peers.
But that may be the unintended consequence that we will pay for full liberation of both men and women from each other.
DC in AB
0
said
0
I think its important to push for equity in pay based on gender, race, etc. As long as someone is qualified, they should get the same amount of money as the next person. I'm glad more and more women are working, but this is not new news that this is happening.
In the end, you can say anything you want with statistics, and Stats Canada is no stranger to that.
SN
0
said
0
I don't see how WalMart can unilateraly decide that 28 hours constitutes full time employment. If that's true they are in contravention of BC Labour Laws, which state anything less than 30 hours is part time. You should alert someone at once! Lives depend on it!
Yeah right. Understanding what you are talking about is probably not as satisfying as bashing WalMart on your keyboard.
Alex
0
said
0
Allan
0
said
0
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
I can hear the world's smallest violin playing just for you.
It's funny how 6.9 million working men are suppressing the income and benefits of 7.1 million working women.
Laura Langstaff
0
said
0
Roby-D
0
said
0
Concert Promoter
0
said
0
In my industry, women's wages and position levels completely outweigh those of men, with the exception of the CEO if he happens to be male.
Women in this industry are the execs we have to work with and go through to get the shows we want, they are higher paid than men are and hold more powerful positions.
This is not the only industry I've worked in, and I do see some progressive changes, such as Paternity Leave. Did they take that into account when calculating the numbers?
I don't quite understand why this mentality from the 50's still exists. Canada is a very progressive country, we have a lot of women execs, many of them are paid better than men in the same company and in the same positions, yet we still have a cadre of women and pink-collar organizations that cry wolf.
Bill Moyer
0
said
0
Mike T
0
said
0
island girl
0
said
0
Freed Man
0
said
0
In case no one's noticed, hundreds of thousands of young men are now on a marriage strike, electing not to marry because of the onerous burden that financial obligation to women places upon men in our culture.
Increasingly, young men have learned from the experience of their fathers, and are opting out of marriage. Before women's liberation and the pill, this was not feasible. But changing cultural mores have allowed both men and women to pursue sexual relationships outside of marriage.
And as women become financially independent, they are more able to support themselves, leaving men free not to become involved in relationships which end in long-term financial obligations.
Soon the feminist dream of splitting men and women will become a reality- it's just that it'll be men who have been freed, not just women.
M. Cameron
0
said
0
SN
0
said
0
Can we get a source other than someome from CAW to talk about wage and gender parity? What a very odd choice.
Devon
0
said
0
Susan
0
said
0