Canada -   

1

Women outnumber men in Canadian workforce

A Montreal Police cadet teaches children about road safety. A Montreal police cadet teaches children about road safety.
A Montreal police cadet teaches children about road safety.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19) Facebook   

Date: Saturday Sep. 5, 2009 6:44 PM ET

TORONTO — Women labour leaders say there's a "dark side" to Statistics Canada figures suggesting that for the first time in history there are more women than men in Canada's workforce.

A recently issued labour force survey found that about 7.1 million women were in paid employment during the first half of 2009, compared to 6.9 million men.

Women outnumbered men in both the "under 25 years" and the "25 years and over" demographics.

The figures are not a reflection of gains in female-dominated industries, but of layoffs and cutbacks in male-dominated industries, such as the beleaguered manufacturing and natural resources sectors, said labour leaders in the auto and nursing sector.

"Nobody should break out the champagne here," said Laurell Ritchie, a national representative with the Canadian Auto Workers' union. "There is a dark side to this story."

In the past year, employment among women has risen by 0.6 per cent, while men's employment has fallen by 1.7 per cent in the same period, the report indicates.

"Men are losing jobs, they're unemployed, they're taking early retirement, when that may not have been their original plan, or moving into self-employment," Ritchie said.

"With women, there has been some increase in some areas of the service sector, like healthcare, and women predominate in those jobs."

Ritchie said she was reviewing the report and noticed something she had never seen before--that there were more women in paid employment than men.

She called Statistics Canada and got the numbers confirmed.

But the study's figures do not include Canadians who are self-employed or unemployed who are actively seeking jobs.

Women are taking part-time and any work they can get, to put food on the table for their families, said Lesley Bell, a registered nurse and CEO of the Ontario Nurses' Association.

"Women are only paid 71 cents on the dollar in relation to men so they're cheaper costs," Bell, whose association is 98 per cent women, said. "Women are getting more work, but at a much lower rate usually."

Still the employment numbers are a milestone, Ritchie said, who can recall the days when women were not taken seriously as "real workers."

"Clearly, we passed that milestone with these new figures out there. Women are very significant players in the labour market."

Bell said the silver lining is that at least more women in the labour force means more women are getting recognition for the work they're doing. "Many hours of women's work is never recognized," she added.

"It's good to see more women getting more jobs,"Bell said. "Hopefully, eventually they'll get equal pay, too."

Comments are now closed for this story

Marty
said
0 0

I am so disgusted by some of the comments I have read here. I am really getting sick of this men vs women crap. I am a woman and I want equality but I do not want to look after a man either. I don't know about the rest of you but I want a partner, not a boss or a dependent. Somehow in this equalization we have lost sight that everyone has to do their part to make it work. When a woman stays at home and looks after the kids, the husband should be out there financially providing for the whole family. And when a man does it then the woman has to be the breadwinner. When BOTH work outside the house then everything should be divided- not heaped on one person.

And lastly to "Freed Man," your comments are accusatory towards women, suggesting men have had enough of supporting us women. And to quote you "Increasingly, young men have learned from the experience of their fathers, and are opting out of marriage." I may add that the mothers were at home cooking, cleaning, giving birth, and doing everything else so the man could go to work and come home and sit on his butt. For the sake of all of us women out there- please stay "free".

KC
said
0 0

This does not surprise me. Simply put, over the past century our society has increasingly given women the equal rights that they so richly deserve as human beings. This allowed for more women to start entering the workforce. As a consequence of more available workers, we have created a society which thrives on money.
The choice to stay home and raise your children (woman or man) has become obsolete in this economy. Traditionally, women were the primary caregivers and thier jobs were to stay home and work for the sake of thier children. I do not find this offensive because having recently had a child, I would love nothing more than to stay home and provide for my child's upbringing and well being. This is simply not affordable, even when the choice exists for the man to stay home and raise the family. Therefore, there will be a larger amount of women (and some cases men) entering the workforce because our society has placed more value in money rather than investing in the lives of our children.


Freed Man
said
0 0

@Roby-D

Concert Promoter has a point. The idea that women earn only 70% of what men make is a feminist myth, based on outdated research and biased methodology.

Men tend to hold very high-paying executive positions, careers that take years of service to a company to achieve. The exorbitant salaries paid to these executives distorts the entire wage-gap picture.

Many women, as qualified as they are, often decide to opt out of the workplace to have children. This puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to moving up the corporate ladder. This may not be fair, but it explains much of the wage gap.

Further, women tend to work fewer hours than men, and so although their net pay is lower, it's based on an unfair comparison. And until quite recently, men tended to have more education, again exacerbating the supposed "gap".

Studies taking these factors into account show the "gap" between men and women's wages is much narrower, depending on the job.

In reality, there are several professions where females earn more than their male counterparts. Women lawyers, for example, now make more than man lawyers in many places.

And with more women earning advanced degrees and having the cash to become single mothers, hopefully they are able to move up the corporate ladder at a faster rate than women in previous generations, without having husbands or relationships to hold them back.

Of course, what this means for our culture is unclear. Children raised without fathers, particularly girls, tend to use drugs and have sex earlier than their peers.

But that may be the unintended consequence that we will pay for full liberation of both men and women from each other.


DC in AB
said
0 0

Its great to hear that there are more and more women in the work place, unfortunately it doesn't prove that gender equality has been achieved since Women typically aren't paid as high. Unfortunately, this article doesn't take into account the percent of population that is female vs. male. Approximately 51% of Canadians are female to 49% of Canadians being male. The number of working Canadians according to this article is 14 million (7.1 million females + 6.9 million males), 51% of this number is approx. 7.1, and 49% is approx. 6.9, right on target, therefore this is really not telling you much except that roughly the same percent of females vs. males are working.

I think its important to push for equity in pay based on gender, race, etc. As long as someone is qualified, they should get the same amount of money as the next person. I'm glad more and more women are working, but this is not new news that this is happening.

In the end, you can say anything you want with statistics, and Stats Canada is no stranger to that.


SN
said
0 0

Mike T -

I don't see how WalMart can unilateraly decide that 28 hours constitutes full time employment. If that's true they are in contravention of BC Labour Laws, which state anything less than 30 hours is part time. You should alert someone at once! Lives depend on it!

Yeah right. Understanding what you are talking about is probably not as satisfying as bashing WalMart on your keyboard.

Alex
said
0 0

I just can't afford to have children. I have over $160,000 in student loans. Raising children under these type of circumstances would be a very stressful. Why bring children into this type of situation? My wife would like children, but she knows it would be difficult.


Allan
said
0 0

Sure, take just one sector - restaurant business. Whom would you hire to wait the tables: men or nice looking ladies who tend to attract more customers paying extra tips? Here ya go.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said
0 0

TO Susan,
I can hear the world's smallest violin playing just for you.
It's funny how 6.9 million working men are suppressing the income and benefits of 7.1 million working women.


Laura Langstaff
said
0 0

This information, combined with predictions that by the year 2014, the Canadian workforce will have drastically shifted to an Aboriginal representation, the government would be prudent in making Aboriginal woman a focus of HRSDC programs and services. This shift is due to an aging and declining non-Aboriginal population, and a young and booming Aboriginal population.


Roby-D
said
0 0

I wonder how much this has to do with Women's wages being up to 30 cents less per dollar than men in the same jobs, with the same experience, receive. A creative way of cutting back in tough economic times by employers, if you ask me.


Concert Promoter
said
0 0

I would really like to know where StatsCan, Julie and Susan get their numbers from.

In my industry, women's wages and position levels completely outweigh those of men, with the exception of the CEO if he happens to be male.

Women in this industry are the execs we have to work with and go through to get the shows we want, they are higher paid than men are and hold more powerful positions.

This is not the only industry I've worked in, and I do see some progressive changes, such as Paternity Leave. Did they take that into account when calculating the numbers?

I don't quite understand why this mentality from the 50's still exists. Canada is a very progressive country, we have a lot of women execs, many of them are paid better than men in the same company and in the same positions, yet we still have a cadre of women and pink-collar organizations that cry wolf.


Bill Moyer
said
0 0

So why exactly are women in some of the lower paid jobs? Did they apply for them?


Mike T
said
0 0

Yes there are "BUT" They are all low paying Wal-Mart type jobs!Plus this is the sign of the times.Just to make ends meet they are forced to accept whatever they can get! And the big box stores take advantage of this plus they are treated like slave labourers by retailers like Wal-Mart.Full time there is concidered 28hrs .Who can live on 28 hrs of low pay and be forced to work nights and weekends when they have a family on top of that to look after?Min wage needs to be incresed to at least $10hr so people can at least make some assemblance of a living!Retailers are the wourst offenders of poor treatment of Women in Canada.


island girl
said
0 0

Not surprising. We've sent our manufacturing industries over seas, fishing and logging are things of the past, and we're left with a lot of service sector jobs. And women in professions tend to earn less than men for whatever reason (maybe because they want to remain employed) Walmart, MacDonald's, anyone ....


Freed Man
said
0 0

This is excellent news for everyone, male and female! Ironically, women's financial liberation may mean liberation for men as well.

In case no one's noticed, hundreds of thousands of young men are now on a marriage strike, electing not to marry because of the onerous burden that financial obligation to women places upon men in our culture.

Increasingly, young men have learned from the experience of their fathers, and are opting out of marriage. Before women's liberation and the pill, this was not feasible. But changing cultural mores have allowed both men and women to pursue sexual relationships outside of marriage.

And as women become financially independent, they are more able to support themselves, leaving men free not to become involved in relationships which end in long-term financial obligations.

Soon the feminist dream of splitting men and women will become a reality- it's just that it'll be men who have been freed, not just women.


M. Cameron
said
0 0

This is a symptom of Canada's overall population being relatively small. For some reason, Canadian men are unable or unwilling to have more children. Why?


SN
said
0 0

Srsly?

Can we get a source other than someome from CAW to talk about wage and gender parity? What a very odd choice.

Devon
said
0 0

To Julie White of the Canadian Auto Workers, women could not hold the majority of work force if they were also not in some of the lowest paid jobs in the labour market. So what does she want? All the lowest paid positions to be held by men? I work for the Federal Government and most of the position's higher paid and lower paid are held by women. Only 30% of my department is men. There is a definite imbalance at my work place and this makes the atmosphere uncomfortable.


Susan
said
0 0

Not surprising overall. They earn lower incomes so have to work much harder and longer to bring in the same wages. The number of women who will have livable pensions and access to good medical care or decent old age homes will also be far fewer than the number of men in spite of the fact that many women will have worked many more hours than men in their lifetime. These things aren't easily found in Stats Canada reports.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Abby Maryk, Dominic Maryk

Missing Winnipeg siblings found in Mexico

More  1 Video(s) 1

Residents survey the damage caused by a force one tornado in Saint Benoit, Que., Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Tornadoes cause millions in damage in Quebec

More  1 Video(s) 1

Vincent Massey Park, Ottawa, Ontario, lightning

Ottawa man struck by lightning dies in hospital

More

Most Talked about Stories

I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...

Pugfire

Environment minister visits stricken Fukushima plant