Canada -   

1
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney speaks on CTV News Channel from Ottawa, Wednesday, July 29, 2009.

Asylum claims from Mexico, Czech Republic at zero

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Immigration Minister Kenney
The minister says new visa requirements were necessary to prevent a two-tiered system, and there are hopes that travellers from the Czech Republic and Mexico can someday again travel without a visa, but internal immigration rules will need to change first.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (71) Facebook   

Date: Wed. Jul. 29 2009 4:15 PM ET

There have been virtually no asylum claims from Czech or Mexican nationals in the two weeks since the federal government required them to obtain travel visas before visiting Canada, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Wednesday.

On July 13, the Conservative government announced it was imposing the new visa requirement on the two countries because they are the two top sources of refugee claims, many of which turn out to be unwarranted.

In an interview with CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife before a Conservative caucus meeting in Ottawa, Kenney said Canada has received only one refugee claim from the two countries since a 48-hour grace period ended on July 15.

"I think this is working. It's allowing the legitimate visitors to come and it's screening out the bogus asylum claims," Kenney said during the interview, which was broadcast on CTV News Channel.

According to Immigration Department figures, refugee claims from Mexico have tripled since 2005. More than 9,400 claims were made in 2008 and claims from Mexico were up 50 per cent in the first half of this year, Kenney said.

Since a visa requirement for Czech nationals was lifted in 2007, claims rose to about 3,000 in 2008, compared to five in 2005.

Many of the Czechs seeking asylum in Canada come from the Roma minority, who have long been persecuted throughout Europe.

The new rules require nationals from both countries to apply for a Temporary Resident Visa. The applicants must prove they do not intend to say in Canada past their approved time, they have enough money for their stay and that they are in good health and not a security risk.

"At the end of the day, we had no choice if we wanted to protect the integrity of our asylum and immigration system," Kenney said. "We don't want to have a two-tier immigration system: a really fast one for people who arrive at the airport as false asylum claimants who get a work permit and sometimes welfare benefits, and a longer, much slower system for legal immigrants who come here patiently. That's totally unfair."

Kenney said the government would like to one day lift the visa requirement, but that will require an overhaul of the asylum claim system to make it faster and less susceptible to abuse.

Right now, asylum seekers can have their case heard before the Immigration Refugee Board, but can sometimes wait upwards of 18 months for a decision. If their claim is denied, they can then file an appeal with the federal court, which can cause further delays.

This all means a bogus refugee claimant can spend years in Canada, Kenney said.

Kenney said he is open to suggestions from his parliamentary colleagues about how to streamline the refugee claims process, including a dedicated refugee appeal board.

"If we could streamline the system, make it move a lot faster, a refugee appeal board would make a lot of decisions where you could have a clear appeal and would probably reduce further appeals to the federal court," Kenney said. "But only if we can streamline and speed up the system."

Comments are now closed for this story

Token conservative
said
0 0

So, just where have all the Liberals gone? I agree totally with this observation, and I believe it comes down to cowardice. All you lefties just can't believe that a NEO-CON has actually done something good! What we are seeing here is the computer age equivalent of a sputtering looter with nothing to say, just a vague negative opinion because the news is contradictory - a NEO-CON doing something RIGHT? Impossible! Looks good on you.


BadP
said
0 0

Strangely, nobody looked into the nature of people coming from Czech Republic.
Poor prosecuted Gypsies are prosecuted there for a reason: they don't mix with the rest of the society, they don't work, they wander around the country looking for things to steal and re-sell, don't mind drug trafficing or kidnapping a runaway girl and selling her to prostitution ring.
Once public tolerance reaches its limit in one place, they move to another. It seems that they feel good in Canada. Do we really want them here?


Virginia
said
0 0

Doesn't anyone realize that is is going to directly affect our tourism! Mexicans coming to visit and spend money here are going to look elsewhere because of the time it will take to get a visa. All because of a handful of refugee claimants. Imagine what will happen if you will need a visa to go on your holiday to Mexico. We are in a recession. This has huge consequences. Can't believe there is not a better way. At least there should have been notice for those caught traveling.


Steve, alb
said
0 0

Heres an intersting idea. Maybe they dont want to come here anymore. Why would you go to a country that really doesnt want you.


Bev Mc Toronto
said
0 0

All I can say it's about time that this happened. We are a haven for so many refugees...some are legitimate...a lot aren't. I applaud this action.




Randy
said
0 0

Great, I can think of a few other contries that this should apply to as well.


reece
said
0 0

Asylum claims at ZERO - what about tourists? Where are the 250,000 Mexican tourists?

$400 for a VISA
$150 for medical tests.

30 day wait for processing or longer.

Who's really gonna spend that kind of energy and time to come here? And why the medical check ups when American travelers come here to give birth because they can't afford the for-profit hospitals in their own country? Maybe we should start requring all visitors to have medical insurance prior to arrival since the Fraser Vally Health does not persue American medical refugees for the bills they leave behind.


Kris D.
said
0 0

HEY FATMAN, where's Harper?

Getting fitted for a new sweater-vest perhaps?

Or is he too busy making more stupid attack ads while our country goes deeper and deeper into debt with no plan to get out of it?


Joyce
said
0 0

There are many people who would like to Immigrate to Canada, and are doing it in the proper way.
Due to Assylum seekers, the system gets bogged down, and those immigrating the proper way are the ones who are paying for the lengthy waits, which has been so for far too long.

The system needs revamping in order that those applying through the channels for Immigration to Canada, get a fairer chance of their application being processed in faster time then what they are facing up to now.


Remarkable
said
0 0

Well, I will have to strongly agree with the conservatives, that this is a measure that had to be taken.

As a Canadian, I am sick and tired of people who come to this country, making false claims and handcuffing the system, which slows the entire process down, affecting all those with legitimate claims.

This is good for you and me and it is good for Canada.

Well done!!


Alex (Toronto)
said
0 0

It's unfortunate that Mexico's internal chaos has made it necessary to filter Mexican visitors fleeing their country. Hopefully Mexico can restore order, so that this restriction can be removed.

It would also be better for the Conservatives to reform refugee processing so as to not offer benefits to non-proven refugee claimants. This would require a system that evaluated refugee claims more quickly; reducing the number of claimants would make it easier to process the remainder. If people could have a hearing within the six months that visitors are allowed to stay in Canada, the problem would go away. Shifting resources from benefits to adjudications would solve the problem. The government has acted rashly in a racist way that exposes Canada to possible retaliation from European Union countries. We are trusting a level of goodwill from European countries that we are not showing them in return.


Helen-Jean, London
said
0 0

Congratulations to the Federal Conservative Government and Jason Kenney. Well done! Oh, to have a majority Conservative Government... I would like the term 'persecution' to be re-evaluated to keep even more undesirable immigrants from using Canada's generous social system in a deceitful way to gain entry to Canada. Now, let's get rid of those languishing in Canada waiting for hearings - they should have not been allowed into this country in the first place and should have been sent back immediately. Good immigrants, yes - undesirable immigrants, NO.


kk
said
0 0

so who now is #1 and 2 on the refugee list, are they next and so on.
not many Mexicans came in as they got caught without visa on short notice including our family for a planned vacation. will vote for someone else.


Cecil
said
0 0

It's our country, why can't we decide who we let in and who we don't? We should be able to deny all claims from certain countries we know are safe, however the Supreme Court has ruled that all 7 billion people in the world have Charter of Rights protection...thanks Trudeau, ya jerk.


Sean
said
0 0

A step in the right direction.

Anytime our refugee system is abused, it makes it more difficult for genuine refugee claimants to get approved.

Anyone, and I mean anyone who shows up at a Canadian port of entry can claim refugee status because they fear persecution from their home country, for any reason, no matter how frivolous,

In return, the Canadian People will immediately...IMMEDIATELY provide-
-Federal Health Care
-Welfare
-A Work Permit

The false refugee claimants can take advantage of the Canadian tax payers money and services for approximately 2 years before the frivolous claim is denied.

Then, the failed claimant will be told to go to the airport to pick-up their paid airplane ticket and confirm their departure... And most don't show up, and Immigration doesn't look for them.

Quite the system. We waste millions and millions of dollars on these people, mean while, true refugees who really need our help, are stuck in refugee camps.

The UNHCR should stop advocating for such liberal refugee/asylum policies, and start advocating for the true refugees.

This endeth my rant.



Pip
said
0 0

Doug in BC writes "This is a job for a non partisan approach".

Every time I hear or read those words, I shudder. It is the non-partisan approach that costs us millions in costs for non-partisan or multi-party committees that deliberate forever to produce a report that is immediately shelved by the party in power as being "not germane to the issue".

As when a politician says "trust me", I grab my wallet in a vain attempt to protect my funds. We are better off leaving policy to the party in power, regardless of color. At least that way fewer of our tax dollars will be wasted.


Lee in Calgary
said
0 0

Thank you Mr. Kenny for final having the guts to do something about this outrageous system.

Once again Mr. Trudeau's efforts to give a Charter and then staff the Supreme Court with Liberal minded judges produced a result that could have been foreseen. The idea that the court decided to apply the Charter to anyone (regardless of citizenship or legal status of entry) that was standing on Canadian soil was foolish and baseless.

The Charter should never apply to any non-citizen especially one that arrives in our country illegially or under false pretences.

It's time to rewrite the law and hope that by the time the Charter challenges make it to the Supreme Court their are less Liberal minded judges sitting there.


Where Have All The Liberals Gone?
said
0 0

Re: Shawn


“Could it be that many liberals actually agree with tighting visa regulations”


So are you saying that you, a liberal agree with the Harper team's decision? Because if that’s what you’re saying, I’m thinking a lot of your liberal friends won’t be real impressed with you. But I respect you for coming clean even if it was in a roundabout way. Thanks for coming out of your cocoon and taking the time to clear things up, but it’s time for me to head back to mine now.

Later ;)



Linda in Vancouver
said
0 0

Politics aside,our immigration system is a mess.Just another government agency in need of lots of investment in order to make it fair and efficient.
One of the big problems is the amount of time it takes to get a decision,and the costly appeals available after that decision is rendered.I think one appel should be sufficient,and that future appeals should be paid for by the applicant.
And,for refugees,all the time they spend waiting for a decision is paid for by the people of Canada.They collect more in benefits and income than citizens who worked here for decades,and are now retired.I think that's wrong.Especially at a time when we have citizens in need.Like First Nations people for example.(No,I am not,but I think they should be put ahead of everyone wanting to immigrate to Canada.)
And lastly,when it takes so long to get a decision,the refugees are also in limbo.By the time the decision comes,many have lived here for quite a long time.Many have had children,now citizens of Canada,and settled into communities.As unfair as it it to Canadians to have to support them,it is also unfair to return refugees after so much time has passed.
We must streamline the process and clarify the rules without the burden of empathy for any one individual or family.There will always be opportunities for the Minister of Immigration to make individual decisions in exceptional cases.
What is good for Canada must come first because we all benefit from sound policies.As it is now,the rules favour lawyers and illegitimate claimants.
Good start here.But not a real solution we can all live with indefinately.


Kim in Winnipeg
said
0 0

The proof is in the numbers people . Thumbs up from me Jason !


datwon
said
0 0

To Shawn

"How about a balanced budget as opposed to a 50 billion dollar deficit?"

Did you sleep through the budget when Ignatieff demanded the stimulus money to be spent??

Liberals pushed for this massive defecit.


Robert in Vancouver and Winnipeg
said
0 0

thanks goodness. Keep these people out!


Eso
said
0 0

And how many tourists from these countries came?


A Koster - BC
said
0 0

Don't kid yourself Jack Moxness.. Kenney is very active in speeding up the system for some.

Conservatives allowing more failed refugees in Canada
Updated: Fri Jul. 24 2009 12:04:50
Jon Woodward, ctvbc.ca

I guess that "9,864 in 2008" had the means.. wink, wink.. to get Kenney's attention and subsequent approval.


Richard L. Provencher
said
0 0

It is refreshing to see pladits given for this successful plan by Mr. Kenney. The zero applications for refugee status proves, the loophole allowed a network of greedy people to work the system. Think of those folks advising others on how to circumvent the legal procedures to get into our beloved country.


AL from edmonton
said
0 0

To: KURT

You have made a few assumptions in your math.

1) What you are saying is that 100% of tourist from Mexico will stop coming here. That is something that is very unlikely.

2) You are saying that these people would only be in our system for one year not very likely when you look at the pace of the system and how many different appeal systems there are.



Gary
said
0 0

I would'nt start patting the Cons on the back just yet. If you were to query the Immigration people behind the desks who work the files for these claims, they knew that when the visa was lifted, claims would rise up quickly. Expect more claims from other European countries, just watch and see. This wasnt in the works just while the Cons were in their minority government right now it started before then.....I smell an election soon.....this is only an attempt to make the present PM look good.......wait and see you will remember this thread!


Doug in BC
said
0 0

I think most people agree that our immigration system is in need of serious changes.WHat is troubling to me,is that we are unlikely to get many real changes as long as we continue to elect minority governments. AND that I'm not sure I trust either party to to reform the system on their own.This is a job for a non partisan approach.
The simplest solution would be to maintain a list of nations from whom refugee claims would be accepted.But that solution comes with it's own set of problems.There is no easy way to sort this out,but sort it out we MUST.Tough decisions cannot be avoided forever.
We should accept our fair share of REAL refugees.But as taxpayers,we should be assured that they are genuine refugees with sincere intentions.We pay these people huge amounts of support while their status is being determined.In fact,we pay them more than we pay our seniors or retired workers.It seems to me,it should not be to much to ask that the system work for the benefit of Canada.Surely we can do that at the same time as we are being generous to those seeking asylum.
I'm not crazy about the approach Mr.Kenney has taken at this time.At least,not as a long term solution.But I also think this was the only choice open to hem,and the right thing to do AT THIS TIME.
I can only hope this will force ALL parties to consider serious immigration reform that will work quickly,fairly,and at a reasonable cost to taxpayers tired of being abused by people looking for a free ride.


Shawn
said
0 0

To
Where Have All The Liberals Gone?

Could it be that many liberals actually agree with tighting visa regulations? Of course that wouldn't occur to you, so tightly wrapped in your little partisan cocoon.


Shawn
said
0 0

To The Fatman
"Now, will somebody please show me one for the Liberals!"

How about a balanced budget as opposed to a 50 billion dollar deficit?



mac
said
0 0

perhaps the system is working..hmmm amazing that a non liberal government can work and effectively !! Where the Conservatives fell down on this is the delivery of the announcement of the rule changes... you need to polish your commmunication skills guys!
As for the detractors..where are you now ...claiming Government claiming unfair, discriminatory etc etc ..
where are those same people when they learned that there were mayors of towns in the Czech Republic paying for tickets for the Romanies to come to Canada and claim asylum -let the Romani apply to come like everyone else..


simon
said
0 0

Excellent!
Who are the other asylum seekers?
Go get 'em Steve!!!


Durham Resident
said
0 0

To all those who are prematurely congratulating the Tories, think again. We have yet to see the effect it has had on the number of visitors from these respective countries. Apparently Vancouver receives quite a bit of Mexican tourists, which will hurt their local economy if Mexicans stop coming. The same thing goes with Czechs. I'm sure that they're reconsidering their travel plans to Canada.

And what about retaliation? Mexico and the E.U. can easily impose visa requirements on us. Remember that we're already in the E.U.'s bad side (sealing ban), so they could very well follow through with it. Have you ever applied for a visa? It's by no means a quick process.

This requirement is simply bigotry. It's truly shameful.


LYNN
said
0 0

Now it is time to date back the last few years and start revoking the refugee claims for those that came to Canada from both nations when the visa requirement was dropped and send them home. Time to leave your free ride that you have enjoyed the last 2 years on false claims and go home. How can they not be false? Now that visas are required once again, they stop trying to come to Canada.... funny about that.


sandhu
said
0 0

Bravo!!!

Now get on with making sure we stop all immigration. First ensure the ones already here are gainfully employed in the professions they have trained for.

Next step get rid of this dual nationality thing...

We can't be sailing in two boats.



Tim from Calgary
said
0 0

Horray for Jason Kenney! The best immigration minister we've had for a very long time. Kenney uses common sense to protect all us Canadians and also those who legally wait to enter this country. The queue jumpers will have to learn that Canada is not a pushover anymore despite the bleeding hearts crying right now. The Liberals would never have done what Kenney has done due to their catering to the ethnic vote.


Scott in Montreal
said
0 0

Hey DCR in Toronto - that's why we have elections, political parties are not simply 'given' majority. Maybe if the Conservative government had cleaned up the disaster they had made of immigration, it never would have come to shutting people out of this country.


datwon
said
0 0

If the Ignatieff office had anything to say about this I can guarantee not only would all illegals get asylum, they would automatically qualify for EI and pension for 0 work hours.




Ki-Som
said
0 0

As long as Harper's team remains in power, we are becoming more and more like the United States, and that is hurting us on the international stage big time.


Jack Moxness
said
0 0

Now Mr. Kenney PLEASE SPEED UP the regular immigration process 4 years + is not "being patient", it's being abused by a phony system. By your own admission: " and a longer, much slower system for legal immigrants who come here patiently. "

-jm


Michael from Toronto
said
0 0

Kudos to our government for biting the bullet and making tough decisions in the interests of Canadians.

I knew of these bogus asylum claims back in 2001 - this is not some knee-jerk reaction. It is not a conspiracy. Europe and Mexico need to fix their own problems and not export them to other countries.

Our government is doing its job responsibly - by making good decisions even in the face of dim-witted loudmouth knee-jerk popular opinion.


Kurt
said
0 0

It is simple math really. 250,000 is the average number of tourists a yearmexican tourist who spend a minimum of $1000 after travel dollars is $250 million. Net out 3000 refugee claims a year at max cost of $29,000 is $87 million. Net loss to canadian economy of $163 million. Another Conservative defecit.


Where Have All The Liberals Gone?
said
0 0

Gee, lots of thumbs down today on the currently posted comments that compliment the conservatives.


Yet strangely all of the liberals seem to be at a loss of words today when it comes to the writing comments.....hmmmm wonder why?


My guess is it's easier to click the little thumbs down symbol out of unguided illogical emotional hate towards our current government than to admit that the Haper government did something right.


Bet I’ll get a lot of thumbs down too, but before you click it give your head a shake over what you’ve become.



meerkat
said
0 0

a good decision with a good result.




Kris D.
said
0 0

Average Canadians don't care about this. Heck, average Canadians don't even know the change happened and could care less even after you explained it to them. If you want to stick up for the average Canadian, let's start talking about the pile of debt we're racking up and how it's going to be paid for.

Especially since Flaherty pronounced this recession is over. Where did the money go? How much has actually been spent? Why are we still piling on debt if the recession is over? Try finding answers to these questions.

This whole picking on Mexicans and Czechs was meant for two things: to change the channel from this government's horrible fiscal policies and to shore up their base.



Dave
said
0 0

Very glad to see that this is working and it is about time that the federal government has the parts to make it happen. Kudos to the PC,s for making it happen but remember that this has been going on for a long time and with previous liberal and conservative govts so Im not trying to be political about this but thank you for getting it right finally


Inkmont
said
0 0

That whole story had me scratching my head because I hadn't thought of either Mexico or the Czech Republic as countries of great political strife or repression forcing people to flee for their life. I am very much in favour of people wishing to immigrate to Canada following due process.


Karl
said
0 0

In whole Canada lives around 80,000 Czech. Only in Winnipeg lives more than 50,000 Filipino, Chinese, East Indians, Muslims etc. These are numbers from Winnipeg only! Where are numbers from whole Canada?
Twenty years from now we (Canadians) will ask for visa to stay here.




Alistair McLaughlin
said
0 0

Heather in London writes:

"Perhaps they're not seeking asylum because it would be more difficult for any family or friends to visit. Did anyone think about that?"

No Heather. We did not think of that. Because if their decision to claim assylum was contingent upon how easily their family and friends will be able to visit them afterwards, then obviously the assylum claims themselves were frivolous. True assylum-seekers are not in a position to worry about whether or not they can have visitors. True assylum-seekers are running for their lives, or at very least, from severe persecution. If the persecution is so moderate that they have the luxury of worrying about whether or not they'll be able to have visitors, then it is not severe enough to merit a refugee claim.


It's way too early to judge the outcome
said
0 0

If there were fraudulent claims made by Mexican and Czech Nationals then I guess it's a good thing if those numbers can be lowered. But nobody should be fooled to think that there won't be refugee claimants from those countries in the future.

The only reason that refugee claims from Mexico and the Czech Republic are at zero (for the moment) is because the visa rules came into effect with no warning. Anyone who has ever applied for a visa knows that it can be a lengthy process. I wouldn't be surprised if our speedy bureaucrats simply haven't processed any visa applications yet and that this is the real reason for the drop in claims to zero.

Wait another 6 month and reassess the success of the new visa rules at that time.


Shelley
said
0 0

Well, looks like it's working so far. Good move, Conservatives. Now move on to some other countries and let's see what happens.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

I'M A LIBERAL, AND...

I absolutely refuse to admit that Immigration Minister Kenney's decision and approach to the obvious problem was/is the right one.


A Koster - BC
said
0 0

So why remove the visa requirement for Croatia in January?.. to let in a few more war criminals?
Indeed, what kind of game is Kenney playing? It isn't "Grow a Backbone" for sure.

Visas for all or visas for none... make up your mind for more than 6 months at a time.



Pip
said
0 0

If, as one poster puts it, "Perhaps they're not seeking asylum because it would be more difficult for any family or friends to visit", then there would be no need to seek asylum. If the seeker is Rom, giving discrimination as grounds for their refugee claim, surely his family members would be in the same situation, and thus seeking asylum too.

It would seem that, as a result of the visa requirement, that our refugee system has been shown to have been badly abused in the past. As for getting a visa for travel, that was the norm for many places, especially in the couple of decades after the Second World War, and still applies for some quite important nations.

For those who object to the idea of visas - even passports: don't we, as Canadians, deserve to know who is coming into our country, and reserve the right to deny entry to those we feel may pose a danger to, or abuse our system?


Phil
said
0 0

US seems to be strict on Mexican visitors and requires proof that they would return home before granting visas.


Scott
said
0 0

The Immigration "consultants" who are responsible and making money off these bogus claims for entry into Canada should be stopped. I suggest that the immigration policy issues go well beyond Mexican and Czech nationals. There are many issues related to Canadian immigration and new citizenship that need to be fixed.
I am all for welcoming new immigrants to Canada. I suggest we need to have some higher expectations that they come here to stay, add value to Canada, integrate into our Canadian culture, and do not pose security risk to Canada or the world.

"Oh Canada we stand on guard for thee!"



Ron in Georgetown
said
0 0

We have a number of flesh peddlers in certain countries that are using our refugee system to jump the line on both legitimate refugees and immigrants. When you see see a disproportionate number coming from one or two countries it is obvious they are not legitimate refugees. Asking for the visa works.


Tono
said
0 0

Well, we don't need Mexicans or Czechs invading our country anyway. Good thing the government has decided to stand up for the native-born Canadian population.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said
0 0

Kenny's words "If we could streamline the system"
Well Jason as immigration minister that's your job. Do it.


MC
said
0 0

To "Heather In London" -

True asylum seekers would not consider their extended family's vacations plans.

If you are seeking asylum it is because you desperately need out of your country in short order to avoid your own death. If you elect to stay in your country of origin because friends and family can't visit you on vacation then you really don't need asylum in the first place.



Kevin D- Calgary
said
0 0

So does this end the EU's possible retaliation? Also why doesn't the government table legislation to the effect that the refugee process gets streamlined without trying to change the immigration process at the same time. Then if a political party tries to grandstand it would really hurt them in the polls. Tying it together with immigration reform is too much at one time and will get bogged down in the details and will allow the parties to gain political points at either end of the polictical spectrum


Peter Kavanagh
said
0 0

Thats great news . As we start to come out of the downturn every tax dollar will have to be looked at .

We need to make the people living here the government's top piroity .

Keep up the good work .


Lorne
said
0 0

For once I agree with the neocons. Now lets take this to the next step and require all people who enter our country to abide by the same rules.


THE Fatman
said
0 0

Appears we are able to add another "mission accomplished" to the Conservative governments list of credits.

Now, will somebody please show me one for the Liberals!

And oh, just in passing "Has anyone here seen Iggy?"


Gilbert
said
0 0

The solution is very simple, Mr. Kenney. We can classify a number of countries as safe. It is my understanding that Canada is the only country that accepts refugee applications from every country in the world. I mean, can we accept every untouchable from India because he/she claims persecution? Mexico and the Czech Republic are stable democracies, so we shouldn't accept refugee applications from there. Another solution is to say that refugee applications must be made outside of Canada for Mexicans and Czechs.


Alistair McLaughlin
said
0 0

"There have been virtually no asylum claims from Czech or Mexican nationals in the two weeks since the federal government required them to obtain travel visas before visiting Canada..."

And that was exactly the intended result.


Chris Ottawa
said
0 0


That's the way to go!! Bravo Jason!! Lets do more!!! Lets save more money!!!


Jason Kenny is a Bilderberger
said
0 0

I along with a lot of other Canadians agree with what Jason Kenny is doing. I do however wonder what his motivation is?

I do not want this man to run for Prime Minister until I find out exactly what went on at the Bilderberg Group meetings he attended.

Perhaps he learnt something about how to become popular.


Heather in London
said
0 0

Perhaps they're not seeking asylum because it would be more difficult for any family or friends to visit. Did anyone think about that?


DCR-Toronto
said
0 0

Well well well. It seems that almost ALL claims were fraudulent. If there were true refugees seeking asylum, they would be applying. It goes to show that these people were simply jumping ahead in line of others who have been waiting years to get in the country.
Very well done Mr. Kenney. There is no reason this government should not be given a majority. Time and time again they have proven to be very capable and do what needs to be done. Not what makes us all feel fuzzy and warm. Sometimes hard decissions have to be made..like it or not.


Sanitylost in Montreal
said
0 0

Once again the Conservatives are looking out for the average Canadian.
Bravo and keep up the good work.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Abby Maryk, Dominic Maryk

Missing Winnipeg siblings found in Mexico

More  1 Video(s) 1

Residents survey the damage caused by a force one tornado in Saint Benoit, Que., Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Tornadoes cause millions in damage in Quebec

More  1 Video(s) 1

Vincent Massey Park, Ottawa, Ontario, lightning

Ottawa man struck by lightning dies in hospital

More

Most Talked about Stories

I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...

Pugfire

Environment minister visits stricken Fukushima plant