Canada -   

1
Belly fat heart disease Belly fat.

Heart disease risks up in young, poor Canadians

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Dr. Marla Shapiro on risk factors
CTV's medical expert explains how heart disease is changing amongst certain socio-economic groups.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (32) Facebook   

Date: Tue. Jul. 21 2009 7:10 PM ET

Canada could be heading for even higher rates of heart disease, suggests a new report that finds more young Canadians are at serious risk of the disease.

The report in the Canadian Medical Association Journal found that the risk factors for cardiovascular disease -- such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity -- are rising among younger people between 12 to 50 years of age.

The study looked at Canadians aged 12 and up from all socioeconomic and ethnic groups. It found an estimated 1.29 million Canadians reported having heart disease in 2005. That's a 19.3 per cent increase among men and 2.1 per cent increase among women compared with 1994.

Rates of high blood pressure were up 77 per cent between 1994 and 2005 among both sexes, diabetes was up 45 per cent over the same period, and obesity rates rose 18 per cent.

The one bit of good news was that smoking rates fell 25 per cent from 2005 to 1994.

The authors suggest that with more young Canadians with heart disease risk factors, cardiovascular disease rates are going to continue to rise, sending more Canadians to an early grave.

"Projections suggest that the rising prevalence of obesity in the current generation of adolescents will increase the prevalence of coronary heart disease by five to 16 per cent in 2035, and may for the first time in two centuries significantly reduce life expectancy in the 21st century," said Dr. Douglas Lee of the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) and coauthors.

Lee notes that the trends in Canada are quite different from those in the United States, where some risk factors, such as hypertension, are declining.

"In Canada, risk factors have not reached a plateau, suggesting that these increases may continue to worsen over time," he said in a release.

People from lower income groups had the most risk factors for heart disease. But the prevalence of obesity is increasing in all socioeconomic groups, while the rates of hypertension have nearly doubled.

Diabetes is also on the rise among almost all income groups, although the gap between the richest and the poorest is widening over time.

"This study has implications for all Canadians because the surveys were conducted in a representative sample of the Canadian population, including all ethnic groups," write the authors.

The authors suggest that Canadians under 50 who haven't considered themselves at risk for heart disease should take action by scheduling routine medical exams and talking to their doctor about ways to reduce their risk of dying of Canada's No. 1 killer.

They also suggest governments take steps to encourage healthy eating, increasing community programming for physical activity in low-income areas and making cities more pedestrian-friendly.

Comments are now closed for this story

liz ottawa
said
0 0

dear sandie in ottawa, shop at Giant Tiger or Walmart, milk is only 4 dollars. I buy alot of my staples there and I am not low income. I refuse to pay over 4 dollars for milk, I just refuse. cheap at Costco too if you have a membership, but if you dont Costco or Walmart have it at that price. and you would be surprised what other stapes they have that are cheaper....shop around. you can buy unhealthy food at the supermarket and pay less but look people if you dont pay now you pay later. I grew up in a family of 5 kids. my mother used to mix whole milk with Carnation to make it go further, she had no choice. and we drank it because we had no choice. bad eating is about laziness alot of the time. you dont have to eat McDonalds or kraft dinner. and whoever said food choices dont affect your health is full of crap. eating badly (high fat, high salt, low nutition) is just as bad for your health, long term, as smoking. I am sure studies would support this. doesnt it just kind of make sense? add to this the fact that alot of the people eating unhealthy are also getting little exercise, and it adds up to heart disease to me, it would have to!


Jay
said
0 0

You can eat a good healthy meal for about $6 per person.Wen i go shopping i see people spending massive amounts of money on junk food.

Lin-Z
said
0 0

I used to work at a grocery store and the one thing I noticed every month when government cheques were issued (ie: welfare!) was the amount of junk these people would buy! seriously, it was PATHETIC! no one can tell me it was cheaper to buy a case of KD, some fries, kool aid and oreos than it was to buy a bag of potatoes, meat, a few cans of tomato sauce, etc., to make spaghetti or lasagna! I once had a neighbor on the system and that was how her grocery orders were. When I asked her why she couldn't buy things to make large meals to freeze, etc., her excuse was it was too time consumming! THE NERVE! My response was what did she really have to do all day? I have always managed to make nutritious food and I've worked 2 jobs most of my life! It's nothing but sheer laziness! I have no sympathy for this "epidemic". Heaven forbid making good food for yourself and your family cut into sitting on your a$$ watching TV! (especially when you can do both at the same time!)


Marilyn
said
0 0

...Schedule an appointment with your doctor? when half of us don't even have a doctor? ...and if you walk into Emerg or a walk-in clinic, you are lucky to get ANY service... yes, this is our Tax Dollars, hard at work.


reidjr
said
0 0

Marilyn
You right to a point lose weight eat healthy live a good life.But some people seem to be under the thought if your thin your healthy if you read the paper watch the news even thing people who are thin may not be healthy.


Avi Ickovich
said
0 0

One of the biggest contributors to this trend is the autmobile culture. We do not live in walkable communities. One way to create walkable communties is to encourage densification. We should have a choice to use a vehicle not be forced into one for our daily activities. One such suggestion is to change the Property Purchase (Land Transfer) Tax to provide people an incentive to purchase medium to high density dwellings.

How Do We Reduce Urban Sprawl?

Many western Canadian cities have been rendered inefficient by urban sprawl. We need better integration of mass transit and urban planning. We need to tailor housing and commercial forms towards mid-to-high density development. Urban sprawl includes increased personal expense, wasted time for individuals, as well as substantial negative impact on the natural environment. The environmental benefits of densification are known to include lower greenhouse emissions and fuel cost savings. Furthermore, the health benefits of densification include more physical activity as people replace walking or transit for their automobiles in compact communities.

A proposal that will also encourage densification is to amend the respective current Provincial Property Purchase Tax regimes across Canada to stimulate the construction of high density housing. Each province in Canada has the equivalent of such a tax ranging up to two percent (with the exception of Alberta and parts of Saskatchewan). Each province has certain exemptions that include first time home purchase. I am therefore proposing the additional exemptions and/or reductions based on density and the promotion of public transit usage:

Within 1 km from RapidBus or Rapid Transit Line: 0.25% of the first $200,000 and 0.25% of the balance of the value/purchase (this will enhance adherence to the required density along RapidBus and Rapid Transit Lines) or
Sliding scale (based on density )
1% of the first $200,000 and 2% of the balance of the value/purchase price (Low Density Interface)
0.5% of the first $200,000 and 0.5% of the balance of the value/purchase price (Medium Density Interface)
0.25% of the first $200,000 and 0.25% of the balance of the value/purchase price (High Density Interface)

This proposal could work just as well by using zoning categories as the determining factor (sliding scale).

Not only will such a concept encourage densification it will be more equitable. If we must tax, at least it should be equitable and perform some social or economic objective and not deter economic development. In fact, it is possible that the proposal will actually stimulate economic development as it spurs the construction of medium and high density residential housing. The proposal could provide further incentives for first time buyers: potential easier re-sale for high density and medium density housing.

Economic and environmental objectives are not mutually exclusive. Young growing families who want to upgrade into larger accommodations and need to raise the upfront money for the tax will now be better positioned to get into the market, while at the same time moving into environmentally friendly living (larger condominiums, row houses, brownstones, townhouses rather than single family dwellings). For instance, a 1% difference on a $400,000 townhouse is a $4,000 upfront cost to a young family.

It is also possible that in the long term the decrease in the rate will be more than offset by the density, such that this initiative may be a net generator of revenue to the respective provinces. More specifically, since economics deals with incremental changes, an avoided sale is still 2% of nothing rather than 1% of a lower housing cost multiplied by a larger volume of sales transactions.

Kojak
said
0 0

Whatever happened to the good ol' days?

Ban junkfood!!!


~Joe North American~
said
0 0

Canada's health care system sucks!


Marilyn
said
0 0

Not one of us knows when our time is up; parents OR children. Therefore, we all need to take charge of our lives, eat healthy, EAT AT HOME, eat basic foods from the 4 food groups, eat proper portions, and EXERCISE, whether it is lifting weights, taking a brisk walk several times per week, or actually getting out there and biking or jogging... GET UP AND GET MOVING! These simple lifestyle choices can make a huge difference in our waistlines.


Catwoman 37
said
0 0

The idea for young men and women is to eat healthy, get lots of excercise and sleep.To avoid putting on weight, and try your best to keep bodyweight down as possible.Being overweight seems to be one the main reasons why people get diabetes.

But it doesn't surprise me that young people are getting sick is because they are under lots of stress.

They see the issues going on around them, and are worried or feeling strained.




R D
said
0 0

Stay away from "diet drinks" They don't work. Avoid Aspartime. It's the killer. Check "Google". Pizza is still the healthiest fast food.Get a frozen one, cook at home for 1/3 the price. Eat slower and drink water with your meal. After your evening meal, wait about 25 minutes and go for a walk around the block. If it's a small block, do it twice. It's much cheaper than a gym membership. If you live in an apartment/condo, use the stairs (at least 3 flights) more often. That's a start.


Alison from Manitoba
said
0 0

I'm 33, I'm fat, I am at risk for heart disease.

You know who I blame? ME. Me, me, me. I bought the sattellite dish with hundreds of channels. I chose the job where I sit on my butt for 8 hours a day. I hit the drive-through so that I don't have to get up 20 minutes earlier in the morning to make a lunch. I choose to drive around the Walmart parking lot looking for the closest parking space so that I won't have to walk as far.

The worst part about it is that I have not only my guilt about my lifestyle to keep me company, but I also get to thank my neighbours for paying the price for the healthcare I will eventually need if I don't do something about it.

Oh, and who's responsibility is it to make sure that something does get done about it? That's right...ME.

(Sincerely) Sorry guys, I will try to be less of a burden in the future.


Man in Burlington
said
0 0

Most low income Canadians live in areas that have no healthy food options. Its all processed fast food garbage. Factor in that many of these people don't have cars and this is not surprising at all.


Cindy
said
0 0

I strongly disagree with the comments that it is not more expensive to eat well.

My husband and I did a little test a few weeks back..he bought all the meat, cheese, milk etc...I bought the fruits and vegetables for the week...it cost him $45.36 to purchase the meats and dairy for one week and for our fruits and vegetables...are you ready it cost a whopping $67.98...my purchases were strictly fruit and veggies and only fresh..we do not eat canned or frozen.

We do not and never have eaten a lot of "junk" food. We rarely eat out maybe 6 times a year.

My husband has coronary artery disease and I have had cancer and am a type 2 diabetic insulin dependent.

Our doctors tell us that with the exception of my diabetes we are a victim of our ancestry. We got the bad genes.

I am not a tiny person, but I am not the largest person in my family and if every one that was over weight contracted diabetes it would be more rampant. My pancreas has just "pooped" out (as my doctor says) not something I have done..although my diabetes is not caused by genes...my body structure is. My gene pool is not something I have control on nor does any one else. I do know that my diabetes is not caused from eating a lot of junk cause I have never eaten a lot of it EVER.

I hate it when large people and those of us unfortunate enough to have diseases are put into one carton and told its because of our life styles...well no it isn't!!! some times we really are prone to certain diseases due to our gene pools.




Julie in Ontario
said
0 0

I remember being in Grade 1 or so doing a class exercise on food choices. Out of the cake and the apple which should you eat first? I responded with the apple so I would be full and not want to eat the cake. I was wrong apparently you should eat the cake first, because the apple will help keep the sugar off your teeth if you eat it after.

I'm only in my early 20's now. I could see the flawed logic then in what they were trying to teach me, however a lot of people don't.

I agree that the school system needs to change when it comes to teaching children about healthy eating. Also those hot dog and pizza days with ice cream and pop, those should most likely be changed as well. I don't know if urban schools had those days, but rural schools still do.


DD in N.S.
said
0 0

BRAVO to the author's of this study, if you look at the Heart and Stroke foundation website it speaks of LDL and HDL fats, and how much is healthy on a daily basis , as well as sodium (aka..salt) the equivalent of 2 teaspoons per day. My husband and I are going to walk with our children 1.5 hrs today after he gets home from work, as we have every other day for the past 3 years!! My kids are happier, they have said "thanks for spending more time with us even when we gave up more TV time." They feel better, they make better food choices!! Please parents get on board WITH your kids so you don't outlive them.


SW
said
0 0

Sometimes you do everything right.
Exercise, take vitamins eat wholesome food and still have
heart disease, high blood pressure
etc.


liz ottawa
said
0 0

I agree that obesity younger and younger is a problem, with more young kids being hardly active at all anymore, spending all their time on video games or texting on their cell phones. However I think a huge culprit is salt content in food and this needs to be regulated, soon or we will be paying the price for it for the next 40 years. alot of fast food or ready prepared food contains the total amount of salt you should be limiting yourself to in a day.


Samual
said
0 0

So if smoking is down, heart disease is up.
Is unhealthy eating worse for you than smoking?


Stef
said
0 0

Can't beat a McDonald's double cheeseburger @ 1.39!!! lol..


sandie in ottawa
said
0 0

Mitch in St. John's

Can you explain to me how healthy food such as i dont know milk and fresh fruits and veggies are cheeper then junk..

Just a note

here in ottawa i pay 4.69 for a 4 litre bag of milk..

however a 2 ltr bottle of pop is a $1 so a family can spend 2 on the same amount of sugar filled pop then on a healthy 4ltr bag of milk..

it is the same accross the board.. when it is the difference between eating and paying rent some ppl cant afford the healthy alternative



said
0 0

Note not everyone has company sponsored dental care.


jiulu
said
0 0

I heard one day on the radio that the smartest investment you can do with $50 is to buy a running shoes every year, and make sure the running shoes is used for running purpose.




said
0 0

Another factor is that a lot of poorer Canadians with 1 income in the family do not have access to dentists and poor teeth health is now implicated as a cause of stroke and heart trouble.

The standard of money expected by institutions such as dentists and everything else such as grocery stores, hydro companies etc. keeps people from having the ability to pay out of pocket expenses for things such as dental never mind better food to keep diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease away.

The government has to do an overhaul on our healthcare to include dental for "everyone". They just can't be complicit in giving "Made in China" our economy and expecting Canadians to 'survive' without an economy, jobs and pay out of their own pockets for necessary health care such as dental.


Rick in NB
said
0 0

Mitch in St. John's,

Why is it harder for a " urban lifstyle " person to make proper meals? If anything an urban dweller has a larger menu to pick from. Unless you are saying urbanites have more important things to do with their day.

As far as exercise goes, it's up to the individual. A long walk does wonders, but you have to get off your rearend.


Alistair McLaughlin
said
0 0

Two words: "JUNK FOOD".

Our craving for sugars, salts, carbs and fats is evolutionary, biological, and deeply ingrained in our genetics. That's because we evolved over millions of years when our very survival depended on consuming as much of these things as possible whenever they were available. Early humans were chronically deficient on salt, and often chronically undernourished, just like many wild animals today. It was a struggle just to get enough calories and nutrients to survive. We also had to expend a lot of calories just to attain food. This was true throughout our evolution.

Now we live in an era when we've got more salt, sugar, fat and carbs than we could ever need, all within arm's reach. Yet we're still allowing the same natural cravings to dictate our eating. Thus the obesity epidemic.

We've come up with all kinds of psychobabble to explain away overeating ("comfort eating", "stress eating", "low self-esteem", "depression", etc...) but it all boils down to evolution and biology. We crave food. We crave salts, carbs, sugars and fats. If we want to avoid obesity and cardiovascular disease, we must make it more difficult to give in to these cravings. That means STAYING AWAY FROM JUNK FOOD. Period.


Rene
said
0 0

Isn't it time for everyone to take responsibility for their own health and stop blaming the government, the food industry, the education system, or any other outside influence.

If you want to have a healthy lifestyle, then you take the necessary steps to ensure this happens. If you want to live a long life, then you take the necessary steps to ensure this happens.

It's time for people to start choosing the life they really want instead of choosing the life they think or wish they had, and then assigning blame because they didn't get what they wanted.



Mitch in St. John's
said
0 0

That's what is stupid though. It is not necessarily cheaper to eat "fake" and "crappy" food. On the other hand, it tends to be easier. What this is really related to is rates of urbanisation. Urban lifestyle prevents people from frequently making their own meals using healthy and fresh ingredients. Many choose to eat out or buy something premade rather than spend the time cooking. Also, so much work nowadays is sitting still in a chair for 8 hours, low and high-paying. Time was a person who was working meant they were constantly getting exercise. Now we are gaining an urban culture of gyms and specific allotted work-out times, which makes exercise kind of a luxury. I always find it strange when people say they "need to join a gym" to get healthy, but its a cultural phenomenon. It all balances out in the end.


Bill in BC
said
0 0

No surprise, this.

Consider:

1. it's cheaper to eat processed crap and fake "food" than real food.

2. the salt & chemical content of fake foods is constantly increasing.

is anyone REALLY surprised?


Matt in Edmonton
said
0 0

So fat people and smokers still have more risk of heart disease but now more people are fat and fewer people are smoking. Is this news?


Mandosa
said
0 0

"They also suggest governments take steps to encourage healthy eating, increasing community programming for physical activity in low-income areas". Here we go again. Your health. Brought to you by your friendly government, funded by your friendly neighbour's paycheque.


MP
said
0 0

I'm not surprised, my wife suffered a heart attack 2 years ago at the age of 32.

The North American lifestyle is to blame as well as well as people's attitude (i.e. "It'll never happen to me!").

OHIP meanwhile is going to take a serious beating both taking care of the aging Babyboomers and todays fat generation needing expensive cardiac care treatment.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Today's Canada Stories

Abby Maryk, Dominic Maryk

Missing Winnipeg siblings found in Mexico

More  1 Video(s) 1

Residents survey the damage caused by a force one tornado in Saint Benoit, Que., Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Tornadoes cause millions in damage in Quebec

More  1 Video(s) 1

Vincent Massey Park, Ottawa, Ontario, lightning

Ottawa man struck by lightning dies in hospital

More

Most Talked about Stories

I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...

Pugfire

Environment minister visits stricken Fukushima plant