Canada -
News Sections
EI claims rose 18.6 per cent in February: StatsCan
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Apr. 28 2009 2:45 PM ET
More Canadians filed for Employment Insurance in February than any month since Statistics Canada first began compiling comparable data back in 1997, the agency said Tuesday.
In total, 325,700 new claims were filed, an increase of 51,000 (18.6 per cent) from January.
In its report, Statistics Canada said the actual number of people who received regular EI benefits increased by 44, 300 (7.8 per cent) to 610,200 in February from the month before.
Since October, when unemployment began to slide, the number of regular EI beneficiaries has climbed 21.8 per cent.
"In recent months, labour market conditions in Canada have deteriorated significantly," the report said.
"Through the early part of 2008, employment slowed, and since October has fallen sharply."
The report said the number of regular EI beneficiaries has increased in almost all provinces and territories across Canada.
The biggest percentage gains were in Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario.
In Alberta, the number of regular beneficiaries jumped by 27.3 per cent in February to 30,600 while B.C. saw an 11.6 per cent jump to 63,700.
In Ontario, the 7.8 per cent jump brought the number of EI beneficiaries to 198,900.
Between February 2008 and February 2009, there was a larger increase of men (36.7 per cent) compared with women (20.6 per cent) that received EI.
Canadian employers slashed 82,600 jobs in February, pushing the unemployment rate up to 7.7 per cent.
In March, the Canadian economy lost another 61,300 full-time jobs, sending the unemployment rate up to 8 per cent -- the highest in seven years.
In Parliament on Tuesday, Liberal Leader Michael Igantieff said the current EI system is failing Canadians who are losing their jobs.
Ignatieff said that in February, applications for EI shot up by almost 19 per cent, yet the number of unemployed actually receiving benefits rose by only eight per cent.
"What steps will the prime minister (take) to ensure that these laid-off workers get the help that they're entitled to?" asked Igantieff.
But Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Ignatieff to "be careful" about using month-by-month statistics because they do not paint an accurate picture.
Harper added that the government has already extended EI benefits and improved retraining programs so Canadians will be ready for new jobs when the economy recovers.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
JK
said
Strange how I thought it was different.
Red X
said
The sub prime mortgages proliferated because the Banks lent to people who were risky. The Banks are getting the bailout the people the tab.
Side note: is China going to be the new scapegoat?
GB
said
Just recently Forbes rated Shell (globally) as the world's 2nd biggest company. Every year these huge oil companies boast of their record profits while the CEOs go laughing all the way to the bank. Then they make statements like "our people are our bigget asset". That's bull!! The world's 2nd biggest company letting people go for peanuts, as if my measily salary is going to break their bank?? Shocking!!
They don't care about you, you are just a number, just like I'm a number now in the EI system. I'll never get money from them, they will stall and stall....
The best thing for us to do is to support our local companies, grow them to be successful. Ask them to give us a chance. Employ your own, please!
Marcia
said
Unfortunately, the Government does not care! They have money to make end meet AND SOME! I have been unemployed since 2007, and cannot get a job at a minimum wage occupation(I am over-qualified), and cannot collect welfare, cannot go back to school because I have no income, and cannot afford the classes. I cannot even claim bankruptcy because it will cost me $1500.00 for the 9 months! What am I doing? Looking for work anywhere that I can walk because I cannot afford the gas or insurance for my car(that is aging). I want to see the Government in our shoes! To starve like we are! I worked for two months at a discount store at Christmas, and got laid off, but never qualified for E.I. I did not have enough hours in! I HAVE to live with family now!
The E.I. stats are only for people that can claim it......what about the people like myself, that cannot collect??? The Government does not care.....they sent my letter requesting help to everyone else....."pass the buck" eh?
Edmonton Jim
said
Mike
said
Linda in Vancouver
said
Trust me.Harper woud govern if the opposition would let him.I was glad he was kept to a minority in the last election.But,given the folly of the opposition, I hope he gets a majority the next time.I am haunted by the words of Dosanjh,who proudly said on election night,"we will not co-operate with this government in any way".I think that's the first election promise the Liberals have kept in years.
The fact is,we had an election,and,whether you like the rsults or not,it IS THE DUTY of all MP's to help get the people of Canada through this recession.And it IS THE DUTY of all MP's to put country before party and do all that they can to help the government govern for all of us.
What is truely pathetic,is an opposition that is actually HOPING and PRAYING that this economy will fail just so they can pin it on Harper,and find a road back to socialist power.
And finally,I would thank those who serve in our military.Unlike Roger T,I believe there is no finer calling for those with the courage to stand up for something.I get the clear impression Roger T is all about Roger T,and that nothing is worth risking his life over.I stand for his right to do so,but I feel sorry for him too.
Mary Clarke
said
B. Kelley, Ontario
said
Yes, Bush was a leftist. The truth is that all parties in Canada and the U.S. lean to the left. Its only a matter of how far. The so-called Neo-Cons are really just the old Libs while the Neo-Libs are now the old NDP. There are very few responsible conservatives left anywhere. Why did the banks in the US fail? Simply put, the socialist ideal that everyone should be able to have what they want when they want it regardless of effort or income (sub-prime mortgages as an example) resulted in entirely too much high risk debt that the economy could not support. That was another Clinton/Bush intervention. Obama is making matters worse by applying yet another disastrous socialist theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poor. Stay tuned for the impending disaster.
Rob
said
You are right that the PM was bullied into Bailouts by the opposition threat of a Coup...but I do not think it will be to hard for us to make up the spending once we are back on track.
If we had a Conservative majority, we would be in a far better position to recover; we would not have to pay back so much in bailouts...but we make so many raw materials for the world (oil near the top of the list), we will be fine, and one of the first countries back on track. Time heals all...even recessions..
Roger T
said
Join the military. They are hiring right now for over 100 different professions!
$52K after 4 years....
Is your life worth $52K a year? or will you even see it before your 4 yrs terms.
Jared in Courtenay
said
island girl
said
"If you can afford the grades.." What did you do? Buy your credential? Healthcare is a good field but not everyone is cut out for it. We need people who are cut out for it, not people who are in it for the money. They don't last anyway.
Mar
said
EI is an insurance fund that we all put into, I hope I never have to use it, but we do need some stipulations on it and although it may not seem fair that there are minimum work requirements, there is not enough money in the EI fund to support all part time jobs that may be lost. Saving as much money of your own as your salary allows so you have some set aside in times of trouble is the best bet, the government can't be relied on to always provide that cushion when things go bad.
Tony
said
Just being a country of ONLY manufacturers makes us too dependent on others. We must learn to lead and compete!
BW in Edmonton
said
A soldier
said
$52K after 4 years.
still waiting
said
Bob
said
Tom
said
Isn't it the purpose of EI?
You pay your earned money out of your salary each month
for decades and then when market strikes you use a bit out of this huge fund. Why should I feel guilty or work for min. wage? We aren’t robots, due all respect to robots.
Albertan
said
CYL
said
MAL
said
Your elitism makes the 600,000 wish for you to join them. Nobody is turning down work... there are NO full time minimum wage jobs where you can work extra hours... the jobs are 10-20 hours / week if lucky. People are working below minimum wage, unpaid overtime, anything to feed the family and someone like you yapping from on high just shows the lack of class of many, many people.
Maria-Toronto
said
I will be out of a job as of November (Co. closing down due to economy) I hope I do not have to resort to EI...that is just not enough money for mortgage, bills, food, car maintenance etc etc etc. I'm already looking around to see what jobs are out there but it is not very encouraging. Plus some of the better paying positions require that you have what appears to be the brain of Einsten and an endless amount of degrees...we'll see what happens.
Larry I Ontario
said
Dave, Ottawa
said
MP
said
Concerned Canadian
said
Thanks for your interesting observations. I agree with you that things will probably get worse: you can't reverse 8 years of bad fiscal management in just 100 days. But I do have a few questions:
You say that "we can't spend our way out of a recession."
You could be right, but didn't Hoover practice exactly the same philosophy in 1930? Didn't he refuse to intercede in the economy, and as a result, the banks failed? And as a result of the ensuing bank failures, didn't the States move from recession to depression?
Should we follow Mr. Hoover's example, do you think?
You claim that "the interventionist lefties got their way, and now we're as bad off as the rest of the world."
But didn't G.W. Bush pass the first stimulus bill? Is he one of those "lefties"?
And isn't Mr. Harper now claiming that in fact Canada is in very good shape? Isn't he taking credit for the budget that those "lefties" forced him into? Or is Mr. Harper wrong?
Do you think it's a good idea for the government to try to stimulate the economy when the free market collapses, or should we let the economy bottom out on its own, regardless of the toll in human suffering?
Can you guarantee that the economy will recover without intervention? Based on what model? Wasn't it free market economics that got us into this position in the first place? If not, then why did banks fail in the States, when the regulated banks here in Canada are doing just fine?
Just a few questions...
Don - Canada can learn & start again
said
Today it is in the high 90's. We are a supplier of raw materials, cars & lumber & until the US economy improves - & with its burgeoning deficits that may be a half decade, Canada will have to accept high unemployment, high taxes, & inflation (possibly wage & price controls) & rely entirely on China & Asia for new growth.
Studying Icelands presently devastated economy should be forced reading for all Canadian Governments including City Hall officials.
Doug BC
said
"Mel" is also right.This is NOT a politically driven recession in Canada.We should ALL be doing all we can to weather this global storm,and,if possible,lend a hand to those we may be able to help out.Whining and crying the blues is total nonsense.We can leave that to the politicians who will surely do enough for all of us.And knowing full well that most of the remedies lie beyond our borders.
"Steve G" has the right attitude about EI.Insurance is alway something many people pay for,but only some collect.It is about helping you in a tough time,NOT about getting back the money you paid in.If you collect if once,for any length of time,you will get back more than you ever paid into the plan.We all pay into it hoping we won't need to use it.And really Jeannne,I think 600 hours of work per year IS a bit skimpy for EI benefits.That's barely over one days work per week.Can we afford to pay EI benefits to all who work 1-2 days per week?
For Canada,and for future Canadians,we should all get creative and find ways to get through this,and resume our debt reduction programs so we will be even better able to manage future recessions.Promote part time work,job sharing,etc,etc.It all help someone,somewhere.
Red X
said
Harper stalled until Obama was inaugurated. Barack will push for fuel efficient vehicles & insulating homes. Which means less demand for Alberta's Dirty Oil & Natural Gas.
Also, congress added the "buy american" provision. Less trade and Cdn Jobs. The Harper Gov't budget assumptions are out and will be running a $42 billion plus deficit this year...
Jim-Surrey
said
All the job loss and job slow downs what did they expect?
If this aren't repaired quickly there will be nobody working to contribute to EI!
And on another note NOBODY should be raising the costs of any services till things level out.
Get the hint Shaw Cable?????
Mario
said
That's a pretty immature statement. Little story for you. A while back I was out of work and applied for a job at Canadian tire. They loved me but guess what. I never got the job. They said I had to much experience in other fields that I would eventually leave. Maybe you don't have much experience in anything, but Wallmart does not hire skilled tradesman. Neither do gas stations.
LH
said
Also, I thought Harper did extend the time you can collect EI and backdated it so more people would benefit?
canji
said
% is very deceving, but overall in Canada it is not optimistic.
Denis
said
Christine
said
Roger T
said
610,200 people were getting EI out of a total working population of what 15 million?....
I don't think it's about the small percentage of EI recipient or unemployment, the Gov't fears social instability which brings crime,riots which is tarnish the country's image. Our country is facing a identity crisis.
Remember our Govt is all about image, they can't even make a decision before the US but waits idle until the very end after the US annouces their decisions.
Red X
said
Last fall, Harper's Gov't should have been governing rather than call an Early Election and a Machiavellan Prorogation to avoid the pending Confidence Vote.
The 5 years of Deficits are the Conservative's Budgets that received nothing in writing from the other two.
Historically the Cdn Economy does better under Liberal stewardship...
Thewiseone
said
The government will never be able to fill the gap with its "Stimulus spending".
Factories aren't going to increase production and create jobs until they think there will be a real demand for there products. Stimulus spending can not replace the spending of every day consumers.
The govt should provide low interest loans.. That extra 10-18% interest we all pay on our loans could be fed back into consumer purchases instead of going to credit card companies and banks.
I wish I could pay off my debts with a loan at 0.5%. Hell my bank just raised the interest rate on my LOC from 9-10.5%.
This is an economic problem that needs to be solved from the bottom up.
Steve G
said
Jeanne B.C.
said
B. Kelley, Ontario
said
Margaret
said
Mel
said
John A.
said
TD
said
Arnie from Manitoba
said
Peter
said
trying to work it out
said