Canada -   

1

Saudi court upholds Canadian's death sentence

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (17) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Apr. 2, 2009 2:50 PM ET

OTTAWA — A lower court in Saudi Arabia has upheld the death penalty against a Canadian in the killing of a Syrian-born teenager, rejecting urgings from the country's high court to rethink the ruling, the Arab News reported Thursday.

The Jidda General Court upheld the sentences imposed on Mohamed Kohail of Montreal and a Jordanian friend, said the English-language newspaper's online edition, quoting sources inside the court.

The report did not say when the ruling was issued.

The Harper government said it was dismayed by the reported court decision.

"We are deeply disappointed at the reports," Deepak Obhrai, the parliamentary secretary to Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon, told the Commons.

"The minister of foreign affairs has requested that his officials review the Saudi court decision when it is issued (in writing)," Obhrai said.

Kohail, 23, his younger brother Sultan, and Jordanian national Homanna Essat, 22, were convicted of murder in the death of Munzer Al-Hiraki during a January 2007 after-school brawl.

The court had been asked by the Supreme Judicial Council in February to review its verdict.

"It would appear the court responded very hastily to the request and did not take up the recommendations of the (Supreme Judicial Council)," Liberal consular affairs critic Dan McTeague said in response to the news.

"My sense is that we have something of a standoff in the Saudi judicial system."

The older Kohail and Ezzat were sentenced to death early last year.

In November, the verdict was upheld by the Appeals Court but was not endorsed by the Supreme Judicial Council when it looked at the case in February.

Sultan Kohail had earlier been sentenced to 200 lashes and a year in prison by a juvenile court.

However, the ruling was overturned by an appeals court and Sultan was ordered to face a new trial in adult court. As a result, Sultan could also ultimately face the death penalty if convicted.

The school fight that ended with Al-Hiraki's death erupted after Sultan, who was then 17, allegedly harassed Al-Hiraki's 19-year-old cousin, Raneem. The younger Kohail has denied the allegation.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is meeting with his G20 counterparts in London this week, and was expected to be, at times, a stone's throw away from Saudi King Abdullah at the gathering.

"I think (the prime minister) has a chance -- for the lives of these two, in the moments that he has over the course of the day, sitting no more than 30 feet away from King Abdullah -- to raise the matter with him," said McTeague.

The Jidda court verdict was expected to be returned to the Supreme Judicial Council for its consideration within a couple of days.

"The court prepared its reply. It upheld the death penalty verdict," said an unidentified court source quoted by the Saudi paper.

"The court will send its official reply on Saturday," he added.

The supreme council is charged with endorsing all capital and corporal punishments issued by lower courts.

Al-Hiraki's family has been approached over the past month by several public figures asking them to forgive the youths. So far, the family has rejected those appeals.

Comments are now closed for this story

Fatman
said

Go to another country and abide by their laws and generally speaking you'll be alright.

Go to another country and be found guilty of killing another human being while there then expect to pay for it on their terms if you're found guilty of the crime in their courts. In the event it's their custom to demand a life for a life then chances are you're gonna suffer the ultimate penalty.

Live with it! (Oops, maybe that's not quite the quip I should use in this instance....)


Doug BC
said

It's important to keep this in perspective.The high courts in Saudi Arabia are on the side of the accused but are having problems getting the lower court to agree to overturn their original verdict.So,even to the Saudi's,this is far from being settled.This is their sovereign country,they are their laws.Our government has no POWER to make them change,they can only ask them to re-consider.
Assuming "Jessica Allan" wants an answer,I think there are several things on the burner that could shed some light.The federal government IS involved in this.However,if they spout off in ways that embarrass the Saudi's,the case will be lost in an instant,and we will have put a lot more distance between our two nations.
The great thing about being an opposition MP,is that you can say anything you want to.Since you are not the government,your country cannot be held accountable.That's why ALL parties look for someone lower on the ladder if they want to say something crass without having the criticism attributed to them.
In BC,for example,the NDP has a local union,(COPE) ranting on about how Gordon Campbell hates children.They get the union to make the accusation,because the rhetoric is likely to strong for voters,and likely to lose the votes of swing voters.It's politics.It goes on in diplomatic circles the same way it goes on here.
That said,I think it's up to the Saudis.And I really question how "Canadian" these guys are.On that score I agree with "Eyes wide open".If they had not gotten into trouble,it seems they would not have acknowledged their Canadian status.
But Jessica is right about the need to read foreign press.The news here is quite often "spun" to suit a particular agenda.


Don Joyal
said

When we are in their country, we should follow their laws, and when they come to Canada, they should follow our laws, NO exceptions. This should also be a lesson to Canadians travelling abroad. Pick and choose where you will be safe.


Evan in Athabasca
said

Laura, please refer to comment number 1, and 4.

End of story. You are fortunate to live in a country where we have exceptions to the law.

I do not bleed my heart out for at least 3/4 of the cases reported on the news. Commit a crime in another country be prepared to do the "full" time....



KD
said

This story was boring and pointless five months ago.


Brad G - Edmonton
said

If you don't like their laws, then don't live in their country.

We can complain all we want, it's a very steep price to pay for a few moments of stupidity and a sad ending for a young life but it's not like they were kidnapped.

One of the previous posts is dead on, we always complain about people not resepecting our laws here, then we feel we're somehow entitled to complain about theirs. Regardless of one's feeling about the death penalty, everyone knows it exists over there so....STAY OUT OF TROUBLE!


Al-BC
said

I agree with all points. However, no one either government or citizen has the right to take a life. Period!!!!


david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
said

Now if WE had the death penalty, these issues would go away pretty quick.


Eyes Wide Open
said

I hope this opens the eyes of Canadians that go abroad. Once you leave Canadian air space, you are no longer under our laws. Going to another country means you are under THEIR laws. Don't expect the taxpayer and Canadian government to bail you out of a situation you shouldn't have been in the first place. Abide by the laws of the land and you will be fine.


Jessica Allan, Vancouver, B.C.
said

What I do not understand is why there is a very brief comment by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Deputy on this new ruling, yet, the Dan McTeauge opposition critic is quoted at length.

What I would like to see and read on this CTV website is a full discussion with the current Federal government's Minister - or spokesman.

What is the point, I might ask, in asking an MP who has absolutely no jurisdiction over this matter in Saudi Arabia?

A Canadian gets more information from reading the 'foreign' press than anything in Canada, such as "the Canadian Press" which
actually writes the majority of what purports to be 'news' for ALL of Canadian media.

Pathetic!


Joe
said

You enter a country and obey their laws. We'd expect the same from visitors to Canada.


Ron in the West
said

We always complain about immigrants coming to Canada and not wanting to follow our laws and customs, but when someone from here is in another country and commits a crime we think we should intervene. Hypocritical!!!


Angus
said

If you commit a crime in another country you fall under the laws of that country.Why should we have to try to get the sentence reduced?


RobO
said

People please learn one simple rule: "If in another country and you commit a crime, be prepared to be punished under there law."

Do not expect the government or taypayer to get involved.




john@regergatatednews.ca
said

Lesson don't go there

Next story


Laura Langstaff
said

It is confusing the way the conservative government picks and chooses which Canadian citizen condemned to death they will advocate for. They seem to have criteria we don't know about to decide when to intervene and when to ignore the plight of a citizen condemned to death.


Matt
said

Set foot on another country's soil, under their laws.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Abby Maryk, Dominic Maryk

Missing Winnipeg siblings found in Mexico

More  1 Video(s) 1

Residents survey the damage caused by a force one tornado in Saint Benoit, Que., Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Tornadoes cause millions in damage in Quebec

More  1 Video(s) 1

Vincent Massey Park, Ottawa, Ontario, lightning

Ottawa man struck by lightning dies in hospital

More

Most Talked about Stories

I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...

Pugfire

Environment minister visits stricken Fukushima plant