Canada -
News Sections
Brison demands 'honest' fiscal numbers from Tories
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Dec. 15 2008 7:33 PM ET
Liberal finance critic Scott Brison says his party can't offer ideas on a stimulus package until Finance Minister Jim Flaherty hands over fiscal numbers that are "honest, up-to-date, accurate and reliable."
Brison, along with Liberal economic chair John McCallum, met with Flaherty in Toronto on Monday for discussions ahead of the January 27th federal budget.
"We can't go on to develop a really sound stimulus package for the future without having realistic numbers we can count on in terms of the present economic and fiscal situation," Brison told CTV Newsnet on Monday.
Brison said Liberals were concerned with the numbers put forth in last month's economic update.
He said the numbers were "too rosy and did not reflect the reality of the Canadian economy and in fact they weren't giving Canadians the full truth about the fiscal situation."
Brison said he also discussed the sale of government assets with Flaherty during Monday's meeting.
"We addressed our concerns around asset sales and the need to have a real plan that we can believe in and rely on in terms of asset sales to meet the projections he's making," Brison said.
"I am hopeful and indeed confident that Minister Flaherty will come back to us on both counts -- a plan that we can consider to be a realistic one around asset sales and fiscal numbers that we can depend on."
Prior to the meeting, Flaherty said he was open to hearing suggestions from the Liberals about how to stimulate the economy.
CTV's Rosemary Thompson, reporting from Ottawa, said the Tories want specific proposals from the opposition that they can include in the budget.
"They don't want wide, blue-sky ideas," Thompson told CTV Newsnet on Monday, prior to the meeting.
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has promised to bring down the minority Conservative government if the January 27th budget does not include ways to boost the economy.
"I believe, based on our meeting today, that there is an openness with Minister Flaherty and the government to actually co-operate with us and to work with us," Brison said.
On Wednesday, Flaherty will meet with his provincial and territorial counterparts in Saskatoon.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV Video Player
Mike Duffy Live - Monday, Dec. 15
Putting politics aside, the Tories and Liberals discuss the budget.
CTV.ca Special
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email

Comments are now closed for this story
Dayton
said
wilbil
said
Jack Layton is the main reason the government isn't sitting to day,its he! who was the Bully when he met Harper to discuss any reasonable ideas he had for simulating the Canadian economy. The problem was Jack had No idea what to do.
Now with a new Liberal party leader one who will listen and not always react Canada has a new lease on life.
Just keep Jack Layton away don't call him and if he calls don't answer.
Jake Castlegar
said
Wayne in BC
said
Andrea
said
Personally, when it comes to international trade, or globalization, and economy, you have to ask yourself this question, "how many people in International trade and the finance dept have their FITT Certification, or a registered chartered accountant, or top rated economist?
Maybe it is time for the govt, and public service to look at the people they hire to do these jobs in the different govt depts.
KennyG
said
My question is why talk to those other parties?
Grow you Libs and show some spunk. We need leadership and you are not offering any.
Michael from Toronto
said
If the data turns out to be bogus they can complain after the fact. PMs should not accuse each other of lying even before they exchange information. If they are then they are just angling for a fight and not fulfilling their duty to their voters. We did not vote in MPs to behave like thugs in Parliament.
For a party that has proven itself to be stupid, I suppose the Liberals have nothing more to lose by also acting stupid.
Brad G - Edmonton
said
AG in Ottawa
said
"the foreign cars are cheap to buy but too exepensive (sic) to fix."
You're correct in the first part: Toyota's and Honda's are cheaper to buy. But you're wrong on the second premise. My Honda's haven't needed anywhere near the fixing that previous Ford's and Chrysler's have cost me. I'll never go back to Detroit Iron. Public money into that bottomless pit is a terrible waste of my tax dollars.
Drew in NS
said
What's McCallums definition of "honest", hopefully he's redefined the term honest to match that of the ordinary Canadian.
They attended the meeting, but Iggy already stated he's not going to support the Tory Budget.
Canada takes to the polls
John E
said
We in Ontario have been telling the ROC what Mr. Flaherty did to Ontario's economy, however, our warnings fell on deaf ears. Mr. Flaherty did the same to Ontario, he built his budget on soft and erroneous data. When Harris was voted out the McGuinty govt was outraged that the financial state of Ontario was so bad. As a result Dalton McGuinty had no choice but to back track on a number of his election promises. Had Mr. Harris stayed in power one can only guess how much worst Mr. Flaherty would have made the Ontario economy. Now the ROC gets to experience the magic book work of Mr. Flaherty.
disgrunted Canadian.
said
The Opposition is not required to propose anything
said
Let's see your big masterplan, Harper.
Sweep the nation with your genius.
Or go down to defeat.
Fred - Brandon MB
said
You must be lying like Flaherty, ultamatt
said
Do you think the rest of Canadians are as stupid as Harper supporters?
PhilipHauser
said
You can't make policy changing with the wind. You have to take what you know and apply the variables to come up with some ideas of what to do.
If this clowns take over and want up to date numbers the recession will be over before they do anything about it.
Richard L. Provencher
said
Conservative-Liberal coalition
said
Canada's first minority government in a quarter of a century fell on the night of Nov. 28, 2005. The Conservatives, New Democrats and Bloc Québécois united to defeat Paul Martin's Liberals by approving a simple motion: "That this House has lost confidence in the Government.
CUT POLITICAL PARTY FUNDING NOW !
said
Because of this Chretien policy Canadians have being funding the separatists and that can be successfully challenged in court as treasonous. That will save us 30 million bucks wasted on partisan politics.
Flaherty didn't lie about taxing income trusts.
said
Yeah, you can really trust Jimbo. He knows what he's talking about, Jimbo does.
Great!
said
Either way we end up with a liberal government cause little stevey harper can't play nice with the other kids.
al from calgary
said
Remember its the democrats that control the house so your anti Bush retoric is old news. Also if you liberals are so sure that the people support you go to the polls, besides it ok if no one in Quebec will vote for the conservatives, you liberals have destroyed your credability in the rest of Canada
Brison just a partisan chatterbox
said
WHERE DOES THE OPPOSITION STAND ON THE ECONOMY- WHAT ARE THEIR POLICIES THEY WANT TO SEE PUT FORWARD?
ultamatt in n.s.
said
Peter
said
Scott from Halifax
said
Why are people believing this guy? He is now saying he supports, what he said he condemned two weeks ago. I heard him myself say he condemned Harper and supported the coalition because Harper put us into deficit, yet it's ok if Brison suggests it. Another power hungry Liberal, who will do anything, say anything, steal anything, hurt anything to get into power.
common cents
said
Jeanie - London
said
Ready to go!
said
Alan
said
I'm still waiting for the news clip for someone being led away in handcuffs.
Rodger in Calgary
said
The solution that was discussed in France and also put forward by President-elect Obama is to invest money into infrastructure. Since this is something that constantly comes up during elections and is obviously needed, the Government should be spending money now on rebuilding bridges, highways, schools, nuclear power plants even...(can of worms there?)
All the overpaid unionized auto workers could then be easily offered gainful employment and serve a great purpose, while still paying their own taxes and their mortgages to keep the economy moving along quite nicely thank you very much.
I'd also like to comment that if neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals nor the NDP put forth any such recommendation, and suggest that we toss money to failing car companies, then I would like to unofficially throw my name in the ring to present a plan to the people of Canada and see what feedback we get out of it.
Common sense is the answer; there is too much emotional, uneducated nonsense being spouted about, including on this website. If you have nothing intelligent to say, please keep your comments to yourselves. It would save a great deal of time and frustration bantering back and forth like a bunch of children in the schoolyard. And YES, for those thinking it, the SAME thing applies to everyone in Ottawa that are SUPPOSED to be working for us!
Thank you.
Derek Lothian
said
If Canada is to truly persevere amongst the worlds most influencial and respected leaders, politically motiviated media ventures on both sides of the bureaucratic spectrum need to shake out the cobwebs and help create a national environment where regular, everyday people once again look to invest a piece (however small) of their own, personal interests into the day's affairs.
Oh, Canada.
Lyle
said
Bob,Calgary,Alberta
said
yet another Ron in Calgary
said
How do the two correlate? Industries and workers that need stimulus don't care about the balance sheet of the country, right?
For a coalition government that supposedly had all the good answers, they sure aren't forthcoming with any. To the Conservatives, or to the Canadians they pretend to represent.
The coalition members howl about 'partisan politics'. How guilty they are of hypocrisy.
It's evident their tactic is to try to demonstrate a 2008 deficit. So what? true or not, it doesn't make any difference for the supposed stimulus required to the economy.
The coalition are the ones that need to 'demonstrate cooperation'. They also need to demonstrate they have practical ideas.
Walker
said
We heard nothing during the election except Green Shift and have heard nothing since. The only thing they've put forward in the media is that the Conservatives have it all wrong. The Liberals evade the question every single time they are asked what they would do and turn it back to those nasty Conservatives and their laissez-faire attitude. I dare any Liberal to tell us what the right thing to do would be and what the Liberals would do for the economy. I dare them to answer the question without using the words this government, Conservatives or Harper. Bet they can't do it. Still laughing.
Elizabeth, Ontario
said
Alysha Ont
said
Jay-TO
said
Of course he only enacted less than half of it since his party members are operating a revolving door with lobbying. So now we have people who are supposedly fiscal conservatives dodging open transparency. And to top it of their supporters want no transparency on this issue. My god people you have absolutely zero standards. What a bunch of sell outs. Blind partisanship leads to authoritarian regimes. Its about time you cons started asking more of your "godfathers".
Mike from Sudbury
said
Sahib Reginwale
said
Stu from London
said
I don't care how bad the Liberals might seem, I'll never vote for the conservatives.
Linda in Vancouver
said
They won't admit it,but they truly do not know.Not in Canada,the USA,Europe,or any other place,has anyone figured out how to get out of this.Anyone who claims to have the solution is simply lying.
There are people all over the world,most a lot smarter than Mr.Brison,trying to get this sorted out.Politicians are just doing what they always do,trying to "spin" the crisis in a way that benefits them personally.
When the dust settles,I see no real fix here until the USA gets a handle on the problem there.Even then,the road back to a reasonably prosperous economy will be a long one.
Trillions of dollars of wealth have been lost.Even if the mess is fixed,I think recovery will take a long time.
BC jeff
said
His leader promised open and constructive dialog with the opposition(s) in the election, yet delivers a statement that was anything but. Harper better get his ego in check and stop screwing with the countries well being. His political ambitions are far less important that the need for the parties to come together and get something on the table that may actually help save Cda from the type financial ruin that is happening in the US. Crazy you say? We're not the US?
Well how is it that Harpers team quietly approved, more than 2 years ago, a plan that allowed private lenders to operate on the same platform as the US sub-prime debacle?? As it stands 50% of all the money loaned for mortgages, since he took office, has been with this dodgy "no cash down 40 year mortgage" scheme? As reported by the Globe more than $56 billion is out there financing property in a market that has real estate now rapidly in decline. Add to that the more than 100,000 fulltime jobs lost (and many more to come starting in Jan) and we're poised on the brink.
Sure we have a better banking system, but that won't save the day if we continue towards free fall in the employment sector. So how is it that Stevie plowed through a 13 billion surplus (including Paul Martins 3 billion reserve) to now have to send us into deficit territory? Bottom line politicians, stop screwing around with partisan bull!! We, all Cdns, need to encourage our MP's to co-operate and communicate towards a new budget that will help minimize the damage to our nation.
Chris Hodgson in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
Whatever it is ,it only makes sense to take the time to get this thing right as whatever decisions are made they will affect us for years to come.As far as anyone trying to pull the wool over anyone I this global meltdown caught every one by surpries by not only it's severity but how quickly it moved through the market's.
So as far as having any real numbers to go on I think it would be much like trying to hit a moving target as the volativity in the markets make it very difficult to make any firm projections.I just hope these guys leave their political rivalry's at home and work together to do what they can to help Canadian's ride this storm and ensure our prospects for the future.Let's not saddle future generation's with more debt for short term political gainn
Brian from Barrie
said
Nick in Sudbury
said
What better way to stimulate our economy that to give people tax cuts which in turn gives people more money to spend as they wish.
The Liberals continue to criticize the Conservatives about not having a plan to get Canadians out of this global recession, however, where is the Liberal plan? Has anyone heard any specifics that the Liberals want to see in the upcoming budget?
I've got an idea! why don't we illegally collect 54 billion in EI contributions from the working stiff like the Liberals did from 2002 to 2005 (which the Supreme court of Canada deemed "illegal") and use it to stimulate the economy?
I need mr. Brison or any Liberal running the economy like I need a kick in the head!
Henry in Alberta
said
v brcic
said
Astounded At The Hypocrisy
said
To the news media I would say this: Why do the Liberals get most of the positive press? The Liberal Party has just been discovered to have taxed the Canadian people illegally to the tune of 60 billion dollars!!!!!! And Brison and McCallum have the nerve to stand there in a media scrum and demand honesty from the Conservative Party?!
This illegal taxation has been glossed over by the media and its sickens me. If the Conservative Party had done that it would be splattered across every headline on every news website. What do the Liberals have on you all anyway?
And do you actually have the courage to post this comment?
Richard D
said
You are absolutely correct. Brison never ran for the leadership of the new Conservative Party. He did, however, campaign in support of the merger, and even voted in favour of it.
Strange, isn't it, that he would then jump ship a mere three days after the vote? Surely he had to know what people would be involved before he voted, didn't he? After all, I'd hate to think that he would just blindly vote in favour of something without researching it or having the political foresight to notice that Reform members would be in positions of influence.
His decision to jump ship wouldn't have had anything to do with the fact that Martin promised him a parliamentary secretary post, would it? Nah. That would make him just like every single politician out there. And we all know he isn't one of those, don't we?
Richard from Ontario
said
It's apparent that you are making a comment re Mr Flaherty without too much knowledge of the subject.
Dalton McGuinty and his Finance critic, made a big noise about the deficit that the PC's were leaving. In fact that was in the middle of the fiscal year and the budget would have been balanced. They then introduced the biggest tax hike in the history of the province and wonder of wonders balanced the budget in two years...Amazing. Funny enough Mike Harris and company haven't been in power in Ontario for ten years yet all the financial and many other woes in Ontario are still be blamed on him...Now I can't understand how Mr Flaherty and Mr Harper had enough power to cause this world wide recession.
Edwin from Toronto
said
Jamie D
said
eugene
said
Get real,Brison!
Brian Good
said
PB - Edmonton
said
Scott Brison critisizes the government without having numbers for the current state of economy! And he needs those numbers to even get the ideas how to save the economy. What a doofus! The more he talks, the more empty-headed he looks.
The only number he really needs is 40 - the number of parliament seats the Liberals are getting in the next election.
Mike in Mississauga
said
The Canadian people want to get on with it Scott. Don't you get it yet!!!
The Liberals are the opposition not the government.
This is what happens when you send a boy to do a man's job
g butt
said
Pat
said
"As I read the reader comments, I am also surprised by the venomous tone toward opposition parties. Could it be that Canada has officially sunk to a state of greater ignorance and partisanship that the US?"
The venomous tone comes from being lied to, stolen from, held hostage by power freaks with nothing constructive to add in a time of crisis, knocking our heads against the wall to have our elected & well paid officials actually get to work and stop the obstruction of our elected government - do I need to go on. I for one am a very proud Canadian but I also have confidence, sympathy & support for our neighbours in the US.
Must be a Liberal supporter - automatic superiority due to years & years of entitlement!
greg McNeely
said
C. Riess
said
Matthew Duncan
said
Its too bad they blew that emergency fund, along with the rest of the surplus! It amazes me how many people on here think the Liberals will somehow plunge the country further into debt. To refresh your short memories: The Liberals are the ones who left Stephen Harper a surplus which only took him 2 years to wipe out! And to the people who are so dillusional as to think Harper's economic update what actually a plan: A plan to do what exactly? 1) Take away the right to strike by civil workers 2) Take away the right's of women to appeal pay equity cases 3) Use his time in power to eliminate funding for the other parties...THIS IS WHAT YOU CALL A PLAN?!?! YOU PEOPLE REALLY FELL FOR THAT?!?!
Get your facts straight people, the Liberals have a MUCH better record of fiscal management than the CONS could ever hope to achieve. But if you are happy with being lied to: "We will not run a deficit, we are not headed for a recession, our economic fundamentals are sound" -J. Flaherty; and if you are happy with a teeny tiny GST cut which really makes NO difference to the average low-middle income Canadian family...then keep listening to Steve!
T.D.
said
Gary NJ
said
RCR in Ontario
said
Who would have thought that?
Jay-T
said
I hope this comment goes through. Seems you have to attack liberals at ctv to get your comment posted.
Dave in Toronto
said
Glen from Ottawa
said
James Colynuck
said
Ken P.
said
Michael Alexander
said
They are asking for the Liberal input is because the Liberal is threatening to topple the demcratic elected government via a backdoor deal with the NDP (for me the NDP is a communist party). This is a gesture of goodwill since we need compromise and not confrontation and threat to govern to great country of ours.
Dave in Toronto
said
Harper the time is now!
Mike From Calgary
said
The conservatives were villified for trying to end the 1.95/ vote scheme that many said was just party politics. However, Chretien created this in order to handcuff the other parties. but we dare not accuse the liberals of anything because they are innocent of every thing, and only have the best interests of the country. Still convinced this whole coalition was about power and nothing more. If it was about Canada poor Mr Dion would still be hanging around wouldn't he.
Robert from Steeltown
said
You don't demand anything when you are trying to cooperatively develop plans for the economy. He should be throwing his ideas onto the table for discussion. That is if he and his fellow Libs have any semblance of a plan in mind. What a bunch of phonies. Everyone knows they only want power at any cost without paying their personal dues.
Gregg in Edmonton
said
Dan
said
If at the time that the conservatives release the budget if the Liberals don't like it then vote it down. Stop using the media to get free air time.
Joyce.
said
As suggested by your comments, that Harper wants to stuff the senate with Coservatives. Please note, that Harper wants to bringthe Senate to full capacity so the Senate is be able to work with a full quota in Committees. This is also with the condition that they will step down and run for the Elected Senate when this comes about, when this happens before their retirement age. Harper said this in prior media articles, and that is a big difference from the rest of the Senators, who are there until they reach 75 yrs of age, and then have to resign their term as a Senator.
That to me is a good move.
bob-sydney n.s.
said
Brent - Penticton, BC
said
Do what you were elected to do, and that is to do the best for Canada, not Party Politics or separatist coalitions.
BlueMonday
said
MJRM
said
pj
said
Well - while they're playing the power game and trying to trump the other while preparing this budget - who knows maybe we the taxpayers will win in this one - still waiting for the refund cheque from the Liberals for their theft of my UI - oh & still waiting for someone to be punished from the ad scandal - but I guess I'll be old & grey and able to tell the story to my grandkids!!
DGRose
said
Larry
said
Mary in Calgary
said
BIG-JIM
said
I think it is time to rid ourselves of our OLD ENGLISH Political system and update to be more similar with the states where you vote for your leader not an MP and of course less political parties and it just seems to confuse all the issues for voters
Ron from Calgary
said
As I read the reader comments, I am also surprised by the venomous tone toward opposition parties. Could it be that Canada has officially sunk to a state of greater ignorance and partisanship that the US?
Mel from Calgary
said
Harper doesn't consult his own caucus; why would he talk to the opposition?
Paul Chilliwack
said
HMmm, they must be running with their tails you know where.
Liberals deceit, that is all it is.
Paul Chilliwack
edd-medhat
said
It's Harper and Flaherty's responsibility to provide a balanced, well thought out budget, not some Neanderthal version of a stressed out spending spree compliments of the Liberals.
Oil Country
said
Steve the Pundit!!!
common sense goes along way
Choele
said
Steve H.
said
david
said
I sure as heck would not want Brison running my company
Lillian
said
John E
said
The point I was trying to make was that contrary to the Conservative spin, Scott Brison is a rational choice to talk economic turkey. Also I must correct you, Scott Brison never ever ran for the leadership of the Conservative party. In 2003, he ran for the leadership of the "Progreesive Conservative" Party. At the leadership convention, his campaign was dealt a crucial blow by John Herron who defected to the MacKay camp. Despite gaining votes on a second ballot, Brison was eliminated by a "mere three votes" and threw his support to Jim Prentice. Prentice lost on the final ballot to MacKay (who won with the support of David Orchard.
Later David Orchard unsuccessfully attempted to prevent the merger with the Alliance. In a high-profile news conference in early November he suggested that the new Conservative Party of Canada was "an abomination, sired in betrayal and born out of deception." He urged PC Party members to vote "no" on any referendum and also encouraged "loyal members" to express their frustrations with Peter MacKay.
It was three days after the PC merged with the Alliance/Reform Party that Scott Brison Crossed the floor to the Liberals.
nc
said
gerald allard
said
Doug
said
It sounds like this was a good first meeting. Maybe the crisis the Tories created will bring about positive results for the entire country.
Gregory D
said
Honest John
said
Peter Rapsey
said
Cory
said
Edwin from Toronto
said
Union problem solved. They automatically equalize pay with Japanese automakers.
All existing big 3 management are fired.
Truly Canadian
said
Peter Rapsey
Just the fact that the Tories are talking seems to me a selling point for the Coalition being there. Maybe Mr. Harper is starting to get the message that competence in governing while in a minority starts with working WITH the other parties...not partisan politics.
So let me get this straight - the Conservatives have to work with the other parties - while "they" keep talking about the coalition (partisan politics - the coalition faction) and brining down the government??? Talk about bully tactics!
If the Liberals were truly looking after Canadian interests (and not their own partisan politics) would they start off every media discussion threating the government? Thats working with them - right?
The Conservatives have a tight, focused plan and the only thing the left want is spend spend spend - so to keep the government functioning the Conservatives are going to spend, because keeping a solid government is much more stable than playing partisan politics...
Michael Fox
said
The Conservatives are asking the Liberals for input because the Liberals asked to have input. It's called working together.
People like Herb will attack the Conservatives no matter what they do.
Doug in Dartmouth
said
Recessions, exchange rates, interest rates are market driven and cyclical. Governments cannot change that. What government can do is cushion the impact in areas that are hit too hard.
Kathleen Bakken
said
Dwayne, Calgary
said
What stimulus really means is taxpayers dollars being spent on various sectors of the economy very likely resulting in huge gov. deficits that you and I and possibly our children will have to pay back.
There is no free ride.
ron of ontario
said
Mike in NB
said
Are these things only now, in the long history of Canada, able to be dealt with? Or are you saying that the liberals should have also taken action when they had the chance? I assume you were disgusted with the liberals when they ran on a platform promising to get rid of the tax altogether? The HST is a killer and adds to the cost of everything from house construction (renovations) to hospital supplies and professional services. Besides, the "revenue stream" goes from my wallet to the government coffers. How much of it do you think I should give away to people (political ideologues of every stripe)I do not like OR trust? Just wondering...
Betty
said
as for the GST I remember when the Liberals based their election campaign on how bad it was and how they would get rid of it....They didn't and now they get upset when it is cut by 2%...
Alma
said
patricia
said
Larry
said
Edmonton John
said
This is sheer poppycock! When a victim retaliates against a bully that has been antagonizing them for too darn long it is easy to just say they are both dysfunctional and have done with it.
Quit taking the easy way out. Harper was at fault. The retaliation was justified and appropriate.
Quit blaming the Liberals, and quit blaming the Coalition. Put the responsibility where it darn well belongs, and that it squarely on Harper's shoulders.
Leasa
said
Iggy is a republican-Thatcher throwback that's all huff and puff, but obviously no substance.
I wish they would have left well enough alone and let the government continue to steer us through all this.
Susanne Noordyk
said
Mike in NB
said
How many liberal appointed senators are currently already STUFFED into the senate? Are you saying that only politicians from one party should be in the senate?
Tommies
said
JB Belleville
said
Really until consumers want to buy these products or can afford to buy these products it is not going to fix the situation very fast. The question becomes can the American Big 3 hang on.
Our crumbling infrastructure seems to need help more.
Also our health care needs a life line.
New Brunswicker
said
When the Conservatives present a budget the opposition socialists would support then we have a socialist budget and Conservative values go out the window.
I hope and pray the Conservatives will notsell their soul to the devil to stay in power.
An election should be immenent if the liberls reject the budget.
Ki-Som Victoria BC
said
Niagara George
said
Without the 'coalition' looking over his shoulder, Harper would have never agreed to a meeting where there was an actual sharing of ideas.
Again, he has gone against the very core of his 'beliefs.' The man is deperate to hang on the power.
Hopefully, he has had enough of a scare so we will have a government that remains focussed on the sharing of power, which is necessary in a minority parliament.
Mary
said
Nick in Gatineau
said
The moment they did, the conservatives then began to accuse the opposition of not cooperating. They began to insult at every step. Plainly put the Conservatives know they can lose power if they don't start acting professionally.
Now we have the Conservatives asking for their opinion ?
The question regarding our entire political theatre at the moment is whether or not the conservatives will actually listen to all leftists and centrists of our nation ? You know, those who have been trying to have open dialog for the last 3 years ?
I'll give 'em the benefit of the doubt for now, but come January, that budget better blow me away.
Will Flaherty meet with the NDP and the Bloc ?
The Bloc represents close to 15% of the seats in the House of commons.
Hmmm. Insult every quebeccer one week and then ask for their input the next ?
Another Ron from Calgary
said
I mean concrete proposals, not blue sky wishes.
If Flaherty brings forth a budget that includes these Liberal ideas, that would be a plus for the Liberal Party and for Canada.
The reality is that the Liberals have no real plan. They will wait for the budget to be released, they will then claim that the good part came from their ideas and the bad part came from the Cons.
Sharon, 5th generation Canadian
said
JRH from LA
said
Samantha Lufrether
said
And with their first budget it was apparent that they had lied. Can we really trust the Conservatives with our issues at heart anymore? Even that silly Dion had a plan!
pasha
said
CM from Edmonton
said
Of course we will see those who hate Conservatives spewing hate, but I for one as a Conservative party member and financial contributor to the party itself am very happy to see Canada's 2 leading parties talking constructively.
A glimer of hope that our government can function now with Mr. Dion out of the way and Harper comming to his senses regarding the economic statement.
Robert Ranson
said
Brian from Western Canada
said
Dayton
said
Raj
said
Alex (Toronto)
said
The crisis was caused by a lack of government regulation, and that lack of regulation is continuing. The banks took the money they were given and they are just pocketing the money. Right-wing laissez-faire policies have caused a huge market failure, and continuing those non-policies will not solve the problem. Any bank that fails to lend dollar-for-dollar what they have been loaned should have government support pulled back. It's not complicated.
Tax cuts helped cause this problem and are not the solution. We need overall economic growth, not just transfers of wealth to the rich. We had growth under the Liberal government (and under the Democrats in the US), and we need to get back to policies that worked. Tories will natter on about a few million here and there and ignore the tens of billions that vanish with their anti-middle-class policies. They shouldn't be trying to call an election every time they don't like what the majority of the elected representatives of the people tell them.
Nick in Gatineau
said
1. Lowering the GST. Most businesses absorbed it and never passed on the reduction to consumers. It also lowered revenue streams for government coffers.
2. Spending the surpluses foolishly. On everything without asking the Provinces, or Canadians for their permission.
3. Taxing Income Trusts. Within 6 months, liquidity for the Financial Institutions began to dry up. Certainly not THE culprit but most certainly a major contributor to the crisis here domestically.
The biggest non-action to date:
1. Doing nothing to restrain Shorting for traders.
2. Not changing Insider Trading laws to apply Jail terms for 1st offences.
3. Not establihsing a National Credit watchdog to stop salesmen to take advantage of consumers.
4. Not stopping the banks from charging excessive credit card and banking fees.
Jean - On
said
Paul in Brantford
said
Call an election!!!
KMC (Markham ,ON)
said
In your glowing bio of Scott Brison, you conveniently forgot to mention that he ran for leadership of the Conservative Party and it was only after he was soundly repudiated that he crossed the floor, like a cry baby, to join the Liberals.
It would appear, then, that Brison was not so concerned about the Conservative Party's connection with the former Alliance, that this "concern" prevented him from running, unsuccessfully, for the leadership of the Conservative Party.
Sean
said
At last check we could buy the entire General Motors Corporation based on its stock value for less money than it would take to "Bail them out". Does that seem too socialist for some of you? Oh, wait, I forgot...Private industry can do a better job! Hogwash!
If were going to throw that much money at the Auto Industry, lets buy Ford and Gm outright and install Toyota or Honda execs to run the show. They seem to be able to manage and know what the consumer wants!
PatrickT
said
It's the government's job to govern and the Opposition's job to oppose..when necessary. If Harper and Flaherty don't know what to do, they can move aside and let the pros have a chance at bat.
Wes
said
Red Deer Joe
said
Darren
said
Elizabeth
said
There is a "big issue" of trust here with Harper. I do n't think he gets it. HEre the Cons have just gone through a near death experience and Harper has the audacity to put a bunch of his cronies into the Senate when one of his campaign promises was to have elect senators.
I love the cartoon in the Vancouver sun here - it shows Harper stuffing a big turkey full of senators from the Conservative Party. What a joke!
Kevin in T.O.
said
Don't believe the hype.
slim in alberta
said
Maroam Atlomspm
said
Steve the Pundit
said
- temporary reduction in GST/HST to boost consumer spending.
- additional incentive for auto purchase (especially fuel-efficient / hybrid vehicles), be it additional sales tax credit or some sort of eco-rebate.
- limited support of Canadian auto sector (in the form of repayable lines of credit, not forking over $$$), in exchange for job guarantees and further investment in fuel efficient production (not trucks)
- lots of money has already been allocated for infrastructure; just need a faster way to get it in the hands of municipalities so they can get busy. The kicker is subway and similar transit projects will take too long in environmental assessments and the like in order to "stimulate" the economy. Pothole fixing, bridge and watermain repair, border crossings, etc. could all be started ASAP and should be primary focus.
- no "stimulus cheques"; US experience suggests people will pay debts or save money, neither of which help the economy in the short term.
- thorough program review of all elements of government spending, and reducing as appropriate. Yes, this should include the $1.95 voter subsidy, but should also include reduction in cabinet, pay freeze on MP salaries, 10% minimum reduction in parliamentary office expense / budgets, etc.
This is the type of budget that Canadians need, and all opposition parties should support. But given recent events, I don't hold a lot of hope.
Ivan
said
MRC in Hamilton
said
If we don't want to worry about the stability of our automotive sector & be self-sustainable, how about we actually engineer our own cars? Wow, engineer & purchase our own cars here in Canada, what a novel idea!! ...
Dayton
said
Joe Sanity
said
Get as mad as you want pal. Last time I checked an angry vote still only counts as one.
Harper has now shown his true colours to Quebecers and wont get one vote from them, which he needs for a majority. He has shot himself in the foot. It’s just a matter of time. The Republican dream is over for Harper and you NeoCons
david
said
Out Yonder
said
Bob
said
"I guest Flaherty wants to talk economy with the
Liberals, since they are the ones that left him whith a enormous surplus and a strong economy, that Harper and Bush manage to turn it in a recession."
Oh, do you mean that (Un)Employment Insurance fund we all paid into that they transferred out to show a surplus?
Arnie
said
Sue
said
John - a Progressive Conservative
said
If this "cooperation" results in a properly considered actual budget aimed at helping the country in these hard times rather than a hateful, low rent tantrum aimed at harming a few political enemies then it is a victory for us all.
This should be Harper and Flaherty's last chance even with their own party and they should be replaced if they fail again.
LHB in Montreal
said
Hope I am proven wrong.
I suggest Mr. Goodable would have been a better choice he does project a certain degree of integrity.
Maybe the wage and price control advocated by Mr. Stanfield and fought against during an election by Mr. Trudeau years ago, only for Mr. Trudeau to implement it once in power might work.
If our economy is to contiue progressing in this global crisis, wage cuts will have to be seriously considered by all concerned. All bonuses for Corporation Heads should be abolish as a start as well as those to the public servants.
I for one would prefer a smaller pay check then none at all. Cuts no matter how small add up.
It is imperative that the negociations develop in could faith. Failing this we should have an election and let Canadians decide.
By the way it is refreshing to notice that the comments, although still partisan are less disagreeable.
GHW
said
My advice to the party faithful Liberals is to chill out. Let Harper reside over a down turning economy and bring down the government in one year. Bring them down now and you WILL regret it either way the GG calls it. A coalition will discredit and blacklist the Liberal Party for a decade. An election will result in another Conservative minority government.
Having said all this the actually strategy of the Liberal leadership through all this could be to simply pressure Harper out.
Dion needed to go, so does Harper. Harper is a great strategist but a poor leader. He’d make a good foreign affairs minister. He should resign after the budget. Let someone with some common sense street smarts take over.
Edwin in toronto
said
In future elections, we only need Tories or Liberal, since liberal can easily get support fro NDP & Bloc.
In Math terms:
Liberal=NDP=Bloc
Albert from Montreal
said
Most banks are predicting Canada in H2 2009 to be growing again, especially based on the new forecasting models from the Bank of Canada came out last week.
Liberals will want to ruin the fiscal integrity of Canada so they can blame it on the current government.
My vote is for cutting income taxes.
Mary in Calgary
said
"Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has promised to bring down the minority Conservative government if the January 27th budget does not include ways to boost the economy."
When people realize that throwing billions out may 'help the economy' cash flow wise, but that it also puts Canadians more deeply into long term debt, then the two sides will be getting somewhere. Don't fault the Conservatives for the debt later if they throw out this cash like the Liberals appear to want. The Liberals will have to adopt a 'we're all in this together' stance if the Conservatives compromise in this way. This damned if you do, damned if you don't thing is getting old with voters.
Ronald in Toronto
said
Jack is spending too much time yelling into an empty rain barrel... because he likes the sound of his own voice with a touch of reverb. In that environment, everything sounds just spectacular.
jim
said
Harper, do something or resign.
said
R D
said
It's Not Only Canada Folks
said
Cripes people this is a WORLD WIDE = The whole Planet and every country on earth's problem and NO ONE I repeat NO ONE can predict whats next.
For instance watch oil climb to $100+ per Barrel again and all Financial Institutions foreclose 90% of their mortgages can we see this coming..who knows , if anybody did this crises would be resolved.
It will take lots of meetings at a global scale and planning by all countries (UN Agenda Item?)to resolve these issues, A good start here at home (North America) it will have to be a joint Canada/United States issue to ateempt to resolve but that can't happen till the new President is in Office
Canuck in Bellingham WA
said
both the Cons and the Libs will be trying to put the best face on this that they can. They both want the best press for their party, and to make the other side look bad. Neither wants to be seen as the one who caused the government to fall at this time.
Adam J and John Smith have good comments. The best thing the gov.t can do is spend on infrastructure. This helps a significant portion of the economy and gives the taxpayer something for his $. We have an infrastructure deficit that needs to be maintained.
And as usual there are a lot of tiresome partisan comments on here. Are you morons under the impression that ignorant slanted remarks villifying your opponents steers a single vote your way?
DGL
said
Gail (Hamilton)
said
M McEathron
said
Ignatieff has for the first part of his life lived in Britain and then spend several more year teaching ( you know what they say about teaching...... those who do ...do those who cant TEACH !) at harvard....then all of a sudden he comes back to Canada some place he has not even spent a better part of his life aand wants to be the PM...please .....and you know what he will do when he is done.... if elected go back to Harvard and TEACH !..and take his pension my hard and your hard earned money right back to the good old USA.....I am not saying harper is perfect but at least he has lived in Canada for the all his life !
Here comes the big deficit
said
But he always finds money for his corporate buddies.
Flaherty could use the contingency fund
said
Harper is too busy wasting federal resources sucking up to this corporate cronies.
UNIONS SCARED TO LOOSE THEIR UNION DUES
said
Mary Clarke
said
It doesn't matter what the current Govt. does,there will still be critisism.
If they help industries,thet're wasting money.
If they don't, they're not helping enough,and don't care about Canadians.
In the eyes of the opposition,and their supporters,only their chosen leaders would do the right thing.[even if it was the same thing].
Before even seeing a budget,they had made up their minds.
Kim in Calgary
said
The Conservatives have to keep their
said
Flaherty is winging it: cave in to the opposition a little; try to have some goodies ready in case there is another election sooner rather than later.
Harper's gang are always playing politics.
Dave Ont East
said
Edward
said
DoasIsay
said
1984. Deficit 38.5 billion.
True Dough
AdamJ, Ontario
said
You really have to love the spin doctoring here :)
The reality is that we are in a *global* financial crisis. Throwing money everywhere will not solve the problem.
It's quite simple. Most of our exports are going to the United States. They are not buying. Our manufacturers are screaming for bailouts so they can stay open and keep producing goods that nobody is buying.
Until things stabilize in the United States (or until we can diversify our exports), we are going to be feeling the pinch, and no amount of money from our Government is going to be able to fix that.
That's the bottom line.
Marcus in Ottawa
said
GP
said
This is such crap, every week the list of private companies that the taxpayer is asked to bailout grows. Now it the forestry and mining industries. Just what exactly is the taxpayer going to get for the privatization of profits. This is just unbelievable.
I don't care who talks to whom, just make it clear what the taxpayer is being asked to go into debt for and why is this our responsibility...this is just crazy.
Larry in Winnipeg
said
Lorne
said
I also don't care which party is the government.
All the parties should get together and throw around some ideas and listen to those ideas.
Maybe, just maybe, we can come up with some great ideas and pull this country out of the doldrums.
NDG
said
Liberals, since they are the ones that left him whith a enormous surplus and a strong economy, that Harper and Bush manage to turn it in a recession.
Don in Vancouver
said
John E
said
He entered politics as a Progressive Conservative candidate in the Nova Scotia riding of Kings—Hants in the 1997 election. Brison was one of a handful of new PC "Young Turk" MPs (along with John Herron, André Bachand and Peter MacKay) who were considered the future youthful leadership material that would restore the ailing Tories to their glory days. However, with Mckay selling out the PCs by merging with the Canadian Alliance to form the new Conservative Party of Canada, Brison announced that he would cross the floor and sit as a Liberal MP. He stated that he had reservations about the perceived dominance of former members of the more socially conservative right-wing Canadian Alliance in the new party.
Scott Brison is a rational selection to deal with economic issues related to the planning of a new budget.
John in Calgary
said
Did you skip a month? Have you paid attention to whats been happening in Ottawa?
The Cons did have a plan and anybody who has taken any type of economics or knows anything about how the economy works knows that it was the right plan.
Have you seen the movie WallE? The landscape of the city is going to be what needs to happen to keep the auto makers running, except the piles will be cars and trucks. The only stimulus package that is going to work is to buy all of the Dying 3's cars they produce, because nobody else is buying them.
But the Cons have to work with the Liberals to keep the government running. Back to the age old Liberal policies....which was, 'Do what ever the U.S.A is doing". We're always going to be in second if we Liberals steering the boat.
Cambob
said
The government (whatever party) must be able to adjust to the circumstances. Whatever may have been said (by any poilitician) in August 08 should be viewed with an objective eye after October 08.
My tax dollars are supposed to go to certain things; education, law enforcement, new roads, etc. In a time of crisis, I can accept a certain amount of deficit, so long as the tax dollars are being used effectively and responsibly.
Is it responsible to use tax dollars for a private business which produces products that few customers are buying?
Is it effective to use tax dollars for private business which has shown little management aptitude and perhaps even less employee concern?
I'd like to see 100 billion in infrastructure investment; new roads, new waterworks, new schools, etc.
I do not want to see xx billions going to incompetant private businesses inundated with unresponsive unions.
Of course, the government isn't listening to me, a tax paying Canadian. But, just who are they listening to?
Ron
said
The Liberals want nothing more than have the Conservatives run a deficit because of the political gains they can make. At the same time, they don't want to be seen as promoting the deficit, but that won't be possible if they have a hand in the budget making process.
Ignatieff doesn't want the coalition, because he doesn't want the Liberals being welded more closely with the Left (and certainly not the Bloc!). He fears a devastating result in the polls if he proceeds.
He knows there is a very real chance that should the government be voted down in non-confidance, the Governor General may well call an election rather than allow the coalition to form government.
Since the Liberals are still paying for the last two elections, they aren't going to be able to mount much in the way of campaigning! They fear the Conservative election war chest.
So, it's my opinion that Ignatieff is going to find that the budget "is tolerable, but only because the money needs to be delivered quickly, and Canadians can't afford the delay to emplace a new government, coalition or otherwise".
The truth is, the Conservatives credit for successive years of debt financing, and tax reduction. Our economy is weathering the storm better than the rest of the G8.
R/H Ontario
said
randy
said
Jack
said
Dan W Waterloo
said
"A recession is natural as the economy goes through its cycles we all just need to stay calm and ride it out."
A man made recession due to corruption and greed is far from a natural cycle.
Giving bank billion so that they will lend money and all they do is stash the money is not responsible.
We were told Canada was insulated from the sub prime mortgages. Anyone read the real facts lately.
Most of today’s problems are based on right wing agendas without protections for the little people. Liberal and conservative policies. Wakeup people.
It is up the big mouth bully to put his money where his mouth is. We will see. He may think he doesn't have to as he still has blind followers.
al from calgary
said
Please remember that 30 million is just a drop in the bucket when you whine about global warming as Canada's ghg are also just a drop in the bucket so we should do nothing about it.
To all The Liberal Posters:
No matter what the government does it is not good enough, if they don't listen the are arrogant and trying to rule as if they have a majority, if they do listen they can't govern because they have to go to the libs for advice, can't please you guys no matter what, you say the cons have no plan but yet we see nothing from the caolition but hot air, not a plan.
If they are going to vote non confidence just for power than lets go to the people because as Joe Sanity says 300 million will also be a drop in the bucket in a trillion dollar economy, and then this way people can see both plans and make up their own minds.
One last thing don't say that the conservatives are trying to rule like they have a majority, when the libs are trying to rule like they are the government, rather than the opposition.
John E
said
However, I still believe that Flaherty is not and has never been up to the task of being Finance Minister and once the Liberals bail him out of this debacle, Mr. Harper should cut him loose. If Flaherty doesn't come through with a plan that meets the needs of the time we'll find out very soon that whichever party gains the confidence of the house they will only do so with the support of the Bloc. Therefore, the Bloc could hold the balance at the end of the day and I'm okay with that because they are duly elected and have the same rights as any MP or political party.
kwconscience
said
There is a great opportunity for the parties to work together here. This is also a great opportunity for Canada to start, I repeat, START to address climate change, and the negative impact we are having on our nation, and world.
Environmental infrastructure projects, meaningful projects, will create jobs, create the ability for consumerism to continue as it was (if that is what we want). There are so many projects in renewable energies, in city and municipal planning and construction. Projects in alternative fuels, in public transit infrastructure, and the list goes on.
Do we really want the government to stimulate the economy through handouts to the auto sector, or would we rather have progress to show for their investment.
Jobs can be created in areas which will help this country lead the world into the future. All of us want Canada to lead the world. Right now, this is not the case.
Join in and call on the government to be responsible in their spending. Create jobs that will lead us into the future, not keep us stuck in teh past.
Ron
said
A month ago, he needed to draft a budget that would garner the support of the opposition - today, he needs to draft a budget most Canadians deem to be reasonable in the current economic conditions - a significantly reduced hurdle.
A month ago, the opposition was in a powerful position - they had the threat of banding together to defeat the government and the possibility of being asked to form their own coalition government.
Today, having made that grasp for power too early and losing the gamble, they are severely weakened - Canadians have spoken loud and clear, they don't want the coalition to gain power and there is considerable risk of triggering an election that all polling indicates would result in a Conservative majority. Dion's ambition to be PM and the Liberal greed for power led to their attempt to overthrow the government - they tried and failed horribly.
There is no danger to the Conservatives that that weapon can be used again - all news reports are showing Mr. Ignatieff backing away and more and more Liberals are marching down this particular hill - a budget Canadians consider reasonable is all that Mr. Flaherty needs produce and there will be no stomach on the opposition benches to vote it down. Thanks to the coalition, the government is stronger and the opposition weaker.
Peter in Ottawa
said
Laurie from Moose Jaw
said
John in London
said
G. Gravelle, Ottawa, Ontario
said
John Smith
said
Dan@Kentville,N.S.
said
Trent
said
Don from Winnipeg
said
I would be concerned that this ism ostly for " show" , and an attempt to win favour ... then wham immediately after the confidence vote, they start back into the shenaigans all over. How does one regain the lost trust in Harper? To me the answer is relatively simple, ( and I know there will be howls from all the citizens of Harperstan out there ) HARPER must go. He , alone has poisoned the well of good , democratic governement ... With a new Conservative leader at the helm , then perhaps all the parties will get to work together again....Sorry Harperstanians , beyond partisanship, beyond co-operation,for the good of this country Harper must go
Reece
said
Anyway, at the very least, not a day goes by without me laughing with these people in power.
J Ottawa
said
Cam in the West
said
More than anything, this will be Iggy putting as much distance between him and the NDP/Sepratists...so he isn't a total bafoon!
J.C.
said
I do hope they can manage to work together without an election on the 27th. However they may all need to be flexible to look out for Canada's welfare and not their own partisan issues.
Shirlee - SK
said
James in New Brunswick
said
The Opposition doesn't have a plan and, if they form the next Government, will be running in circles for months. Or perhaps they will just start signing cheques and handing them out, so they can be seen to be doing something. "We tried but the world economy was just too weak. Its not our fault!" I can hear it now.
I hope the Government does solicit input from academia, business and the Provinces and find out what they NEED rather than what they WANT. Economic stimulus can take many different forms from a cheque in the mail to every household to corporate welfare to real investment in our future productivity. If the Government was smart, they would try to do a little of each, but focus on the investment side of things; preferrably tinted some shade of Green.
Goodluck, Mr. Flaherty!
Ed in AZ
said
Jim in Ontario
said
Larry NL
said
After hearing Scott Brison speak, he leaves people with the impression that he is not going to waiver from what the NDP strings are controlling him to do.
I feel that Canada has a better chance with Iggy calling the shots for the Liberal party.
Joe Sanity
said
"lets see if the liberals still insist on their 1.95/vote, everone needs to help save their job, with tax payers money."
I guess you mean Let's see if the Conservative are stupid enough to try and antagonize the opposition majority again.
And for what? 30 Million? A drop in the bucket. They just wanted to allow their own party to start collecting big corporate donations again. The last things these dirty bozos want is a level playing field.
Tom Hawley
said
It does appear the Conservatives are now acting like a minority .
If the Liberals present something which they feel is appropriate the Conservatives can appose or accept .It is that simple.Surely Mr.Harper would not accept a decision that is bad for Canada to just hold on to power.
Forgetting the coalition as it is surely Mr.Harper would not accept the Bloc's vote in the up coming budget if it was needed to stay in power.
Further more I was told as many were that Canada was in a good position to weather the financial storm.I wonder what happened ? The Liberals told us things are going to get worse.Mr.Harper accused them of fear mongering.The Liberals were right!
I believe Mr.Harper owes all the electorate an apology for misrepresenting our financial situation.Perhaps people would have done some things to protect their money.
As an economist, which during the election that card was played ,and more important as our PM he should have been aware.Economist or not.
Andrew:
When it comes to politics you must be wet behind the ears.
The $1.95 per vote was a smoke screen.Do you honestly believe that Mr.Harper wanted to throw his $1.95 per vote away? He knew that this would ruffle some feathers knowing his party would still be getting the roughly $10M.
He could have stated something like this in the throne speech.
Regarding the $1.95 per vote us Conservatives will not be accepting this payment.During this financial crisis I feel we need to do our part.With me saying that I urge all parties to consider doing the same.If you choose to receive payment it will be forth coming.
Now that would have made him look like he was trying to be creditable?
Manly - Oshawa
said
Bev from NB
said
Kitty
said
Pip
said
Is Canada ahead of the game? If those cuts were as bad as the Liberals and NDP feel, why are socialist European countries following suit? I hope that the Liberals will take such information into condiseration in their meetings with Flaherty, and not insist on unrealistic spending plans that will plunge the country neck deep in debt.
JP in North Saanich
said
one your screwed up and said the wrong things like you boss Harper.
Second - if you bail out the auto workers- dont forget the pulp and paer workers who lost there job, the forest workers who lost there jos, and talk to you co minister - Veterans affairs and dont foregt you presnt vets and future vets.
PS_ and dont forget HELP for the Seniors whom you been playing with their pensions.
You csn not make a mess of the economy, you have done that already, therefore its time for you and the Conservatives -
TO CLEAN UP YOUR MESS
Tom P St Kitts
said
Joe Sanity
said
Earl Robert
said
Political bashers ill informed
said
Please educate yourself on what a "structural recession" is, you have it backwards.
Political bashers ill informed
said
Please educate yourself on what a "structural recession" is, you have it backwards.
Chris Hodgson in Ontariariari-Oh
said
ET
said
Stuart
said
AZ
said
You can not be that out of touch with reality, can you? or maybe it's an education thing???
The Conservatives are working with the parties to try and make the government work. Even if they had the perfect economic plan, they would have to alter it to appease the other parties, or they would be kicked out of office.
The Conservatives did have a plan, but when 3 other parties formed a coalition to kick you out, you need to change your plans.
That is one problem with the Coalition, there are about 100 different "theories" on how to stimulate the economy, and if they feel the conservatives don't pick the right one, they will topple them??? Right now the weatherman looks more accurate then most economists with their forecasts.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
az
Walter
said
Marcel
said
MIchael (Ottawa)
said
Winston Churchill
It is incumbent on the opposition to COOPERATE with the government NOT dictate what is or is not going to be government policy. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has shown he is on top of the situation and is taking measures to consult with those he should to gain s much input as possible.
According to British Parliamentary procedure and tradition this coalition of losers in the last election does NOT MEET CERTAIN CONDITIONS to become the government which means if they bring down this government that the people just installed then the GG will be obligated to call an election at which time the people of Canada will surely hand the Liberals and NDP their political heads on a platter.
Scott Brison is a lawyer and while he fancies himself as man about town and now an economist he failed to impress in his last role.
Elizabeth S. Hutton
said
Cory - Toronto
said
Jake Smelly-Mann
said
Cale
said
The public wants an end to the nonsense, and guess what?
We also do NOT want an election.
So, get to work! All of you!
westguy
said
Scott in Halifax
said
B. Kelley, Ontario
said
Anthony
said
Jan
said
Adamwolf
said
Cliff
said
A recession is natural as the economy goes through its cycles we all just need to stay calm and ride it out.
Debt caused the problem and going into more debt will not solve the problem.
Andy Bryski
said
To stay the course was a good plan because we can only react to what happens with the American economy.The Coalition's "plan" was to throw tax payers money into a pit on the perception that they were saving the economy. There is a flaw that has been in place in our economy for a lifetime. We need new trading partners and the PM realizes this as he has already commenced discussion with the EU. Until we diversify, we will always be the mouse that has to give way to the elephant. Rather than giving tax payers money to a bloated auto industry and an arrogant CAW, we should commit that money to urban transportation and an efficient rail system to properly support the Atlantic and Pacific Gateway initiatives.
Goldens
said
John Wilson
Bridgetown NS
terri
said
Connie from Alberta
said
Fred Thompson Whitehorse
said
It is easy to through money around. The trick is to make the money go as far as possible. Use it where it will do the most good and have the longest lasting residual effect.
If there is to be a deficit it must be carefully planned and must be as small as possible. No deficit is always the best way. There is no way to spend your way out of debt.
As for the Liberals and their threats and bullying of Mr. Flaherty I say to Mr. Flaherty Take your time look at the long term and make the right choises for our county.
I'm sure that you will not be able to please everyone, especialy those that have no plan but chose to charge ahead blindly. We all know who these are! Good luck!
Peter Rapsey
said
Michelle
said
wayne near the 'peg
said
Tory Twit.
said
Clearly the Tories have No Plan for the economy.
Flaherty should consult the 18 new senators.
Mark Aubere Moricey
said
The Government has finite financial resources so when is it going to run out of money to help Canadian workers and the middle class - not immigrant workers of the future - before or after it runs out of money bailing out speicific companies???? Remember this is the same Government that has an aversion to deficits after it spent a 10b$ surplus to convince us to vote for them and then tried to tell us that they spent it because they knew there was a recession coming...
Mark Aubere Moricey
Andrew
said
Doug Ontario
said
Mike R
said
The gov't is just too dysfunctional to work anymore. Unfortunately the parties are too busy just trying to stay alive to even care about Canadians. It's all about them.
Jo in Gtown
said
We can't fix this alone, and as much as I hate to say it, we have to wait and see what Obama has up his sleeves, the US has a tremendous impact on what happens here.
Even if Harper and his government come up with the "magic potion" to cure the world's ills, the others will squawk and disagree as they only care about having power anyway.
james
said
A government inclusive of separatists, implicitly or explicitly, is unacceptable. Brison either cooperates or we should go to the polls.
Herb
said
Edward
said