Canada -
News Sections
Canada tied for last in UNICEF child care ranking
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Dec. 11 2008 10:30 AM ET
Canada is tied for last place in a UNICEF ranking of the early child-care services offered by 25 developed countries.
Canada failed to meet nine out of 10 of the proposed benchmarks UNICEF used to rank the countries.
The 10 proposed benchmarks included parental leave of one year at 50 per cent or more of salary, a national plan with priority for the disadvantaged, and child poverty rates of less than 10 per cent.
The only benchmark Canada met was that at least 50 per cent of staff in accredited early education services had post-secondary education with relevant qualifications.
"What's happening in Canada didn't surprise us because we know about the inconsistency of care and some of the quality issues and issues around parental leave," UNICEF Canada's Nigel Fisher told CTV's Canada AM on Thursday.
"I think what did surprise us is the comparison, to find we were last."
Fisher said most children are in "unregulated and unaccredited care" so officials can't measure the standards.
"Number one is we need to set standards across the country, those standards need to relate to the training of care-givers," he said.
"There are also issues around access for the poorest people because we know that care can really make a difference to kids coming from at risk families later down the line in terms of their learning and earning power."
Fisher said Quebec and Manitoba stand out as the best places for early childhood services in Canada and Ontario is improving.
Still, he said "it's unfair on parents if they move from one province to another to find completely different quality and access issues."
Fisher is calling on the government to include funding for child services in next month's budget.
"We feel absolutely that investment in children, in child care, in parental leave, should be part of that package," he said.
The only country to meet all 10 standards was Sweden.
Iceland met nine of the 10 requirements. Denmark, Finland and France met eight benchmarks.
At the bottom, Canada was tied with Ireland, Australia met two of the benchmarks, while the U.S. and Switzerland met three.
The full list of the 10 UNICEF benchmarks:
- Parental leave of one year at 50 per cent of salary
- A national plan with priority for the disadvantaged
- Subsidized and regulated child care services for 25 per cent of children under 3
- Subsidized and accredited early education services for 80 per cent of 4-year-olds
- 80 per cent of all child care staff trained
- 50 per cent of staff in accredited early education services tertiary educated with relevant qualification
- Minimum staff-to-children ratio of 1:15 in pre-school education
- 1 per cent of GDP spent on early childhood services
- Child poverty rate less than 10 per cent
- Near-universal outreach of essential child health services
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is high time to replace Air Canada with a no-frills airline that can slash prices and still be profitable.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
New World
said
Let's see… who dropped out of Kyoto? Was it not Harper?
Child care…
Harper's first act as prime minister was to cancel federal-provincial child care deals that laid the groundwork for a real child care system - child care services has gone from $1.2 billion to $250 million, a reduction of 79 per cent.
See facts. not accusations.
Doug
said
K Blake, Wallaceburg
said
Dan@Kentville,N.S.
said
JC
said
That and being the highest taxed country in the world probably isn't helping. There's just nothing left to give.
Doug
said
Socialist I Guess
said
PJT, Montreal
said
I suppose you'd rather pay 60% of your income to secure and insure your person and property against transgression by the miserable, impoverished citizens you turned your back on? Good luck with that.
The Swedes tax heavily, yet somehow beat us in every quality of life index. Where are these right-wing, free-market paradises of which you speak, where there is low crime, good health and a happy populace? Name one, past or present.
Your utopia is a total myth perpetuated by selfish, heartless people.
I have an idea
said
It might sound so harsh but having a child is the choice of the parents. It takes two people to make one child (traditional)! If the parents are NOT even mentionally, financially responsble and just want to get the BABY BONUS CHEQUE every month - then we should have the right to do something with it!
Take a good look. Most well educated, stable income parents take parenting very seriously. They PLAN FIRST before THEY ACT! They don't make four or five children because they understand they have to give their children the best!
But most of the LARGE FAMILY are coming from low income family. They didn't PLAN ahead of time - they JUST ACT. Then those children are the ones that end up suffering all the way since birth!And they aexpect the Government to take over!
Should we sugguest them to take a course and get a License first before we delivery the baby? Can't afford them having this SUCKING attitute over all of us - the taxpayers!
Randall
said
Don H. in K.L.
said
Dave T
said
I have 2 kids. 2 & 4 years old. Here's a novel plan. How about I take good care of mine. And other people can look after theirs.
helen in Toronto
said
Most of the day care teachers are very loving and qualify. Some of the teachers might have language difficulities. But overall they take their job very serioulsy.
Private day care might be a bit different. It's not they don't care but they might be lack of space or extra help if they run the day care at their own home!
Again, Canada is still BEHIND on the EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND DAY CARE issue and we, the taxpayers really want the Government to support this area as soon as possible!
We don't mind to pay the tax but please spend it wisely. Put some extra fundings on the Day Care area so that some parents can go out and work and pay the tax.
It is another long term investment but we all parents will 110% agree with!
Steve in Hamilton
said
I guess my wife - or my mom if she watches my children don't have standards or at least they can't measure them?
Why do we require a minimum of 1 year off with 50% of income?
I'm sure that the people that write and want these standards would say that 100% income for 5 years until the children can be handed over to the all maighty public education system is best.
not a chance.
Kevin
said
I have followed the "stats" for years and according to you "professionals" I have lived below the poverty line with my family for over 25yrs. Yet my family have never ever looked or felt poor. And we did this on a single income for most of the time, and have never made more than 45,000 a yr and I have five children. Has UNICEF ever thought that their "standards" are wrong?? What makes their expectations the rule book??
Maybe the United Nations needs to look at their back door before they slam Canada's.
David
said
Child care is the parents responsibilty. Not the governments. This national daycare stuff scares me. I wouldn't want my kids raised in a toddler gulag.
If you can't afford children, don't have them. What I see now is people having three or four kids, with an income barely able to feed one. That too is not the governments problem.
When did Canada become a nation of people with their hands out?
Rene
said
If we can't support the children of our society, in a meaningful way, to allow them to develop physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually, how can we expect our society, or humanity as a whole, to grow over future generations. We as adults keep saying things like "it's time to change society's consciousness and become good world citizens." Well it starts with the children. Let's help them become good world citizens.