Canada -
News Sections
Racy film stirs controversy on Parliament Hill
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (20)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. May. 29 2008 10:58 PM ET
A controversial new film has become the talk of Parliament Hill.
Critics of the movie -- entitled "Young People F---ing" -- say the film is as racy as its title suggests and highlights everything that's wrong with public funding of Canadian films.
The website for the film -- which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival last year -- promotes "YPF" as "a scathingly honest and hilarious portrayal of four couples, one threesome and a crazy night of sex."
A special screening of the film for MPs, senators, and staffers Thursday evening has created quite a stir. The film's distributor set up the screening so that politicians could judge the controversy over the film for themselves.
Some Conservative MPs say they won't attend an event featuring such a risque movie. The "YPF" controversy has already cost a young Tory staffer her job. She had apparently ordered a ticket for the film under her boss' name.
When her boss, Conservative MP Gary Goodyear's name popped up on a screening list for the movie, the staffer -- Victoria Van Eyk -- was let go.
She says she would not have been fired had she booked tickets for a less controversial film.
"The Conservative government doesn't support films like this," Van Eyk told CTV News.
While the Tory MPs stayed away, other politicians said it was important to see the movie before rushing to judgment.
"I am going to see the film. I think it's important that members of Parliament do. This has become the centre of a debate of what's appropriate to fund -- and what's not," said Liberal MP Mark Holland.
The controversy over the film has set off a larger national debate about government support for Canada's film industry.
Charles McVety, the president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, told CTV Newsnet's Mike Duffy Live the film is nothing more than pornography and he's outraged such films receive federal tax credits. McVety didn't say whether he has seen the entire movie, but noted that he had "seen enough of the film" and that it was not "about growing tulips in the spring."
McVety said the film is precisely the reason he supports a section of Bill C-10 which would restrict federal funding for productions deemed "contrary to public policy."
Critics in Canada and in the international film community say the bill could kill the Canadian film industry. Oscar winning director Ang Lee, who filmed "Brokeback Mountain" in Alberta, has said the bill is "almost like censorship."
"YPF" producer Steve Hoban said on Mike Duffy Live the film is not pornographic and that critics such as McVety are trying to impose their own tastes and values on the Canadian public.
"What you're saying," Hoban told McVety, "is you don't want the government tax credit to go into films you don't approve of."
Defending his film against McVety's repeated charges of pornography, Hoban said the larger issue is the importance of the tax credit to Canadian artists -- and all workers in the film industry.
If the tax credit is taken away "the entire Canadian film industry will suffer to the point where banks will no longer provide loans," Hoban said.
"(They) will not bank against the tax credit if it becomes a conditional thing that can't be determined until the film is finished."
Hoban said the tax credit is a minor investment which provides huge revenue returns to communities across the country.
As for "YPF," the recent controversy may help boost ticket sales. Not missing an opportunity for free publicity, Hoban managed to get the last word in to end his contentious debate with McVety. He noted the film will hit theatres on June 13.
With a report by CTV's Graham Richardson
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Add New Comment ( )
SN
0
said
0
They need to put their (own) money where their mouths are and stop leaning on the taxpayer to help them make a living.
I'm not against pornography or risque movies, but I am against supporting them with my tax dollars. If they're as good as they say, they shouldn't my tax dollars anyway. Let me support it at the box office, not at the tax department.
John
0
said
0
Brad B
0
said
0
DPat
0
said
0
get a grip
0
said
0
Woot woot
0
said
0
Mike Webster
0
said
0
close minded
0
said
0
C-10 should be supported - why should we taxpayers fund this trash?"
Why should laws only support one point of view?
Free speech. Look it up.
joe
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
Bryan
0
said
0
BOHICA
0
said
0
Let me paraphrase this bit of film making advice from none other than Norman Jewison given to a masters class at the Banff Television Festival..."if you wanna make a film where no one is gonna wanna watch it, and you're making it so that only you appreciate it and masturbate on how good you are...then finance it yourself. No one cares to watch artsy film making, tell better stories"
Okay, not a direct quote , but that was the jest of his message about Canadian films.
If you're a Canadian filmmaker be thankful you have a pool of financing funds you can go to to try and make films. If you don't like our system...go to the States and try your luck in their competitive marketplace.
Akeem
0
said
0
Graham Henderson
0
said
0
Hasn't this already been voted on?
0
said
0
FreakAlert
0
said
0
JDP
0
said
0
But seriously, are we so debased as a country that we need to portray our 'cultural identity' in a movie called "Young People F--king?" Sadly, most Canadian films seem to be going this route, as if to try and seem sanctimoniously superior to our friends down south.
Pathetic, really.
Steve
0
said
0
To top it off, the story contains an interview with Charles McVety, a right-wing evangelist and head of a lobby group that opposes gay marriage. He may be outraged by the film (that's a surprise), but as Canadians we should be outraged that this guy actually holds influence over our Con MPs.
Rick
0
said
0
DD
0
said
0