Canada -
News Sections
Some cities pushing back against drive-thrus
The Canadian Press
Date: Sunday Dec. 9, 2007 12:39 PM ET
At some popular fast-food restaurants across the country, lineups are so long they stretch out of parking lots and spill onto public streets, and politicians are eyeing the emissions spewed by all the idling cars, trucks and sport utility vehicles.
In London, Ont., civic leaders are considering restrictions on existing drive-thrus to try to clear the air. A citizens' advisory committee is also recommending a moratorium on new drive-thrus, although the mayor is trying to strike a balance.
"I don't support a ban or a moratorium on drive-thrus ... but if there are ways in which we can improve the air quality in ways that I can't imagine at this point, I'm really open to looking at that and seeing if we can strengthen our bylaws," says Anne-Marie DeCicco-Best.
London council is gathering public input on a range of options, from banning new outlets to tightening zoning bylaws to make more areas of the city drive-thru-free. City staff have floated the idea of restricting the hours of operation for drive-thrus, and a decision is expected in the new year.
In Hamilton, Ont., where Mayor Fred Eisenberger describes himself as "reasonably anti-drive-thru," council is studying an environmental group's call for a moratorium on new drive-thrus.
In Kings County, N.S., one politician has argued that only people with decreased mobility should be entitled to get their food while in their vehicle.
"I think a pregnant mom or a disabled person or a person who couldn't get out of their vehicle or an older person, they could use the drive-thru," says Wayne Atwater. "But these people that are able-bodied men and women, I certainly don't see any reason why they can't get out of their vehicle."
Atwater pushed for a moratorium on new drive-thrus last winter, citing concerns about carbon monoxide and traffic problems, but he couldn't persuade his council colleagues.
Communities from Toronto to St. John's, Nfld., have taken steps to ensure that drive-thrus are far from certain residential streets or big enough to fit a long lineup of cars. But it's the increasing worry over greenhouse gas emissions that's prompting a second look.
Students at the University of Alberta monitored a popular Tim Hortons outlet in Edmonton last year for 54 hours and counted 3,756 vehicles idling for an average of more than five minutes each. The longest idle was more than 12 minutes.
Tim Hortons's drive-thrus tend to generate the most attention because of their popularity. In Winnipeg, cars spill out of Tim's lots onto such major thoroughfares as Portage Ave. and St. Mary's Road as drivers queue up for a java jolt.
"They're victims of their own success," said Winnipeg councillor Mike O'Shaughnessy. "You can see 15, 16 cars in line at three in the afternoon or seven in the evening."
Winnipeg has rejected two proposals for Tim Hortons this year. One was nixed because it would have interfered with a driveway of an adjacent business. The other was axed because nearby residents expressed concerns about traffic.
But O'Shaughnessy says those were individual cases and Winnipeg has no plans to crack down on drive-thrus. "We're not against Tim Hortons. We're not against drive-thrus," said O'Shaughnessy. "They're very popular."
Tim Hortons says it has taken steps to reduce drive-thru lineups, such as allowing motorists to use credit cards that don't require signatures. Many drive-thru work stations now have their own coffee maker and other equipment, so attendants don't have to walk to another part of the shop to fill an order.
The company also says it meets or exceeds space requirements in city bylaws. "We tend to find sites that are a little bit larger so we can accommodate a big parking lot and have a larger than required drive-thru," said Tim Hortons spokesperson Rachel Douglas from the company's headquarters in Oakville, Ont.
"(Drive-thrus) are almost becoming a bit of an essential service. You have parents with young children, you have elderly people with mobility issues. We find that our customers are wanting drive-thrus and are using drive-thrus and that's really what's behind the demand."
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Perhaps they should look at reducing duties resellers must pay for products coming from the US to Canada in order to level the field? Then it would be prudent for the resellers to offer competitive pricing and good service to maintain a loyal customer base.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
julz
said
M. Cameron
said
Eric
said
Brian Fraser
said
J. C.
said
Vince M
said
Then I also wonder if the cities are willing to shut down access to their landfills? I have seen long waits to gain entrance there.
BC Ferries probably ought to be shut down too... now there's a line up!
Don't these politicians have nothing better to do?
R Demers
said
We have the same problem here in Hawkesbury On the drivethru for Tim Horton is situated on our main thoroughfare and its a real pelemele in the morning and around suppertime.The hospital is just 3 blocks away and thats the street that leads to it.We also have trucks and motorways parking on the side of the street.In order to avoid that i have to drive almost 5Ks to get to my home, a real hassle But yet just what can be done i also frequent Tim although i dont use the drivethru
al
said
Eric
said
Set a 'maximum' number of cars per drive-through and anyone who shows up afterwards, too bad, so sad, get up and go into the store.
As for restricting drive-throughs for only the 'less abled' I have to say that this is probably just as silly an idea as parking in the middle of the street. So only people with handicaps should be afforded convenience? I exercise, but that doesn't mean I always feel like getting out of my car and trudging across what can be a -large- parking lot (parking spots up front aren't always available after all) in less than enjoyable weather just because I have both legs.
Just because I'm not handicapped doesn't mean I'm any less important than they are. I'm a little tired of being afforded less rights than others based simply on the fact I can walk.
HOWEL
said
Michelle
said
Rob
said
Gordon Tryon
said
Chris
said
The bottom line is that there's a price tag to drive throughs in terms of safety and the environment. We need to decide, as a society, whether we're willing to pay for that convenience. If we are, then we can go about figuring out ways to minimize their effects. If we're not, then they get shut down.
Kanataian
said
What I would suggest is if one is ever in an accident because of the traffic lines at a drive-thru, be sure to name that company, the town, city or municipality where the business is located in your statement of claim. That may be the only way for the zoning of these establishments to be forced to change.
Why should anyone have one;s safety threatened because others are too lazy to get out of their cars for a coffee. They call kids playing games lazy, geeze.
Brad
said
Dylan
said
WJ
said
Rob
said
Steve
said
Let's get our priorities straight, people.
Jim
said
If traffic is backed onto the street, the driver of the vehicle made that decision and should be ticketed according to the traffic law. As far as vehicles idling in the line up, what would be the difference if they parked the vehicle, left it running while they went in to get their order. Would big brother make that against the law as well?
There is no problem with the drive thrus, its the people using them.
Steve from NS
said
Brian Mooney
said
A GroundsKeeper
said
Gord J.
said
And the concept of an envoronmental tax is ludicrous... see how many hospitals were built with billions collected in cigarette tax. Don;t go there.
Ktichener Resident
said
Louise Daigle
said
graham
said
Mark
said
As for those whom are concerned about the environmental side perhaps they should leave their cars at home or sell them or use your public transit and in this way you can off set the pollution that I will be causing when I use the drive through now and in the future.
MIke
said
Maybe retro is good. Maybe we should bring back A&W type drive ins... alas, that would never be profitable enough in our 'money first' driven society.
Bob K
said
Paula
said
I think that the problem this local store suffers from is that there is constant turn over of the staff so they never get into a "well oiled" machine. I frequent another store in Woodbridge and the staff there work as a team and although line ups may be 10 cars - it moves quick.
I can see why communities are moving towards limiting drive thrus. So while we may loose some "convenience" it would likely be better for us in the long run.
Looking
said
Layton
said
CURT
said
Jeff
said
Dan Gonta
said
Carolyn
said
The other environmental issue I noticed with drive-throughs is the amount of garbage that gets carlessly spewed everywhere. Sure, patrons who don't use the drive through make garbage too, but they don't seem to be in such a rush. Its gross seeing all that garbage blowing around in the street and in the parking lots.
Brian
said
Joe - Ottawa
said
Tanya
said
Bill
said
CWS
said
Jeff
said
Charlian
said
Randy
said
Chrissy
said