Canada -   

1
Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, centre rear, wraps up a news conference with VIA Rail CEO Paul Cote, front left, and Donald Wright, VIA Rail Chairman, front right, after announcing a funding increase for the crown railway at Union Station in Toronto, on Oct. 11, 2007. (CP / J.P. Moczulski) Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty poses on a Via Rail train on the platform at Union Station after announcing a funding increase in Toronto on Oct. 11, 2007. (CP / J.P. Moczulski)

Ottawa announces nearly $700 million for Via Rail

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: John Vennavally-Rao on the new funds
10p_via
CTV Newsnet: Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon
KW11_VIA
CTV Newsnet: Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks from Union Station
KW11_VIA
CTV Newsnet: David Jeanes, president of Transport 2000
DM11_via_chat

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (47) Facebook   

Date: Thu. Oct. 11 2007 7:53 PM ET

The federal government announced on Thursday a funding injection for Via Rail of nearly $700 million over the next five years.

Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon announced the $691.9-million initiative to help Via Rail refurbish passenger train service, at Union Station in downtown Toronto.

"As minister responsible for Via I can say it is clearly an essential entity and it has convinced millions of Canadians that trains are a more humane way to travel," Cannon said Thursday afternoon.

The funding marks the first significant injection of new money in years for the cash-strapped Crown passenger rail corporation.

The initiative included $516 million earmarked for capital acquisitions and $175.9 million for the refurbishing of locomotives and passenger cars.

Cannon said the train system acted as a binding force and played a steadily expanding social and economical role in Canada.

"The operating funding will help Via to continue providing an affordable and competitive option for intercity travel," he said.

Via Rail serves 4.1 million passengers over 14,000 kilometres of track each year. It provides service for 450 Canadian cities.

Via receives about $170 million in annual operating subsidies from Ottawa. However, the company has suffered since the former Liberal government halted a $700 million-funding commitment.

Canadian Auto Workers President Buzz Hargrove said the announcement is welcome news.

"This funding is a lifeline for VIA Rail services that was desperately needed," said Hargrove. "This announcement not only benefits the over 3,000 CAW members at Via Rail, but could also provide an example of how purchasing Canadian-made products can be used to maintain and create jobs in the Canadian economy."

Cannon said the announcement highlighted the federal government's dedication to funding the country's infrastructure.

He said the government will invest $33 billion into Canada's infrastructure through the new Building Canada infrastructure program -- Canada's largest investment in half a century.

"This plan will provide long term, stable and predictable funding to help meet infrastructure needs across the country in communities large and small," he said.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Canadians are looking for transit alternatives that are economically and environmentally friendly.

"By taking the train people can bypass traffic congestion, especially in major urban centres like the Greater Toronto Area. They can save on the price of gas. They can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, all at the same time," Flaherty said.

"This is a service also that is relevant today as it was decades ago and our government is committed to preserving and expanding passenger train service for future generations."

He said the money will allow Via to provide faster, cleaner and more reliable service across Canada.

Cannon said the government signed a "memorandum of understanding" with the rail industry to set targets for emissions reductions, earlier this year.

"By rebuilding the existing locomotive fleet, Via Rail will achieve these emission targets. It will improve fuel efficiency and provide travellers with faster and more reliable service," he said.

The announcement of $691.9 million over five years is the largest capital investment in the company.

"These investments that we are announcing today will spread on a five-year period, but they will be felt much past 2013. They are now targeting energy economy, reduction of gas emission, the offering of equality services to encourage more travellers to leave their cars behind and to choose train," Cannon said.

Some funding will likely go to upgrading sleeping cars for passengers with disabilities, a requirement after a recent Supreme Court order.

"It's certainly not enough for everything Via needs, but it's a very good start," David Jeanes, president of Transport 2000 Canada, told CTV Newsnet. "The specific programs that were identified today ... that's money that really had to be spent to keep those trains in good order."

Jeanes said the company had been starved for funding for so long it can no longer meet growing demand.

"The travel demand is there and where Via sees a market it needs government support to go aggressively after that market," he said.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Stuart
said
0 0

I truly hope the alterations to rail cars will provide some moderate form of wheelchair accessible sleeping accomodation for cross country service. Now, you can sleep in your electric wheelchair the whole trip or get off to use a hotel occasionally & wait 2 days for the next train.


Denise
said
0 0

I find the commments about Europe and Japan being so far ahead of us quite amusing. When you consider the size and population/tax base of the average European country and how much infrastructure each country is responsible for maintaining, and then think about the size and population of Canada. Do you really think we can build and maintain that kind of system here?


Terry
said
0 0

Typical. I remember talking to a conductor one day back in 1994. He asked me why we were building a new train station in Saint John, New Brunswick. I figured it was because of the convenience of bringing people to Harbour Stadium for various events. Both buildings shared the same parking area. The conductor rebutted my comments saying that every new train station he had seen built usually closed up permanently within two years. Well, you guessed it, he was right on the money.


Canadian
said
0 0

Again, this is a total waste of money as it does not serve the needs of very many Canadians, ie schedules and locations of depots.

J. Smith
said
0 0

Does this mean via will actually reinstate its "special stops west of Winnipeg service," instead of only making special stops east of Winnipeg, which seems like Via's own officla "Western Alienation" policy? Will $700 million be enough to help Via solve this problem, or is Via going to keep refusing to make special stops west of Winnipeg and leave Westerners out in the cold, literally, at -30, trying to get rides home at 3 am on winter roads across the prairie???


Ben Hanhart
said
0 0

For those who are thinking it would be ideal for VIA to re-introduce routes in western Canada, consider please the following. Do you really think VIA is willing (or able) to invest billions to deliver what we need, or will VIA simply re-restablish lower-frequency conventional routes which must be shared on freight lines? I think VIA would do the latter. It's time for Alberta to consider its own high-speed initiative. Should VIA get into high-speed, it will be in eastern Canada first.


Prince
said
0 0

If everyone wants a High Speed Rail System then write the prime ministers office at pm@pm.gc.ca, you can express this desire to his office. You do eventually get a response from him or the minister responsible with in a few weeks. I support the idea of a properly vetted high speed rail system between every major city in Canada. It's time Canada caught up with the the rest of the world. I see already a significant amount of support just in the comments.


D.Goguen
said
0 0

What about the tracks? I didn't see any money for fixing the tracks that cause derailment each year.


Gordon M. Craig
said
0 0

All very true, all very desirable; BUT what about Vancouver Island and the Malahat?? Can we get some upgrades both of equipment and perhaps more importantly of scheduling? There are a lot of people here on the Island waiting for good transportation to and from Victoria.


a
said
0 0

Finally a governemnt that puts money where it should go. I love what this government is doing. Keep up the good work!!


David
said
0 0

As a former CN rail worker back in the day when Mulroney was in power, there were some major changes to VIA during an election year. The line that ran from Calgary to Vancouver was axed (this run actually made money for VIA) and the line that stayed ran through Joe Clark’s riding (Edson) and Don Mazankowski’s riding (Vegreville) – needless to say that run always lost money. I’m Tory blue, but decisions like this are a complete joke for the taxpayer. VIA and the CBC should both be axed for good.

Doug
said
0 0

Last time I checked we in B.C. don't have VIA train service..haven't since Mulroney pulled it years ago.


DDDDD
said
0 0

And here I was thinking that VIA had been privatized. Look at all the success CP rail has had since privatization. Sell them and lower taxes.


kurt
said
0 0

What a waste of money there are probably only 6 stations open in western Canada.


Ian
said
0 0

Must be the election Harper doesn't want coming down the tracks. It's typical of any government to spend, spend, spend right before THEY want to go to the polls. This whole situation actually makes me laugh. Anyone that can't see thru this whole charade of Harper's is either blind or stupid and I sincerely wish Canadians will actually look at WHO is trying to force an election rather than who is blaming whom for the election. Liberals-1 conservatives 0


Jesse
said
0 0

Has anyone looked at the price of a rail ticket compared to an airline or bus ticket? It makes very little sense to spend big bucks on rail infrustructure in areas other than the GTA (and I'm from Calgary).
WestJet has Calgary-Edmonton tickets on for $55 today; there's no way rail service could be provided at that cost.
Rail may be handy, but not when there are easy alternatives.
If you choose to live in the boonies, don't expect the rest of the country to subsidize your travel.


Trev
said
0 0

I would love to be able to take the train from Eastern Canada to Vancouver as a trip but unfortunately the price is way too expensive. Once VIA makes its prices affordable then maybe they will see much more people using their system.


Erick
said
0 0

Elwood, the answer to your question "I like trains, but why they need more funds when the private bus operators won't have a penny?" is the following.

1) the bus lines are already “subsidized” by the fact that they freely use roads built and maintained by governments, while VIA Rail has to maintain the few tracks it owns and pay trackage rights to private railroads who own the tracks on which most VIA trains run.

2) VIA Rail is forced by the government to serve remote localities. VIA is loosing a huge amount of money with these services that no private operator (bus or other) would never want to serve at all.

3) The Supreme Court condemned VIA to modify it’s Renaissance passenger fleet for handicapped persons. This judgement by itself will cost nearby 100 millions.

So, if VIA or even a private rail operator just had to run a train on tracks freely maintained by the governments as buses and trucks do, and wasn’t forced to serve remote or low population areas nor have to serve disabled persons nor any other contraints, it would probably not need any subsidy.



Tommer
said
0 0

For kicks a few years ago, we thought the 4 of us in our family would see what the cost would be to go from Cranbrook BC, to Dauphin, MB, return, at Christmas. Fat chance. I should have checked into renting a LEAR JET, and it probably would have been cheaper. Plus, the closest station was in Kamloops, - A SEVEN HOUR+ DRIVE!!! I forgot what the exact price was, but it was easily close to $4000!!!!


Val S.
said
0 0

The price for two way or even one way trip is so high that sometime you prefer to rent a car with full insurance and gas comes cheaper! :) I would take train!


Shaun
said
0 0

I can't help but feel that the money could be better spent on upgrading the tracks. Or, one step further, investing in a train system like the one Japan and some parts of Europe. I traveled from Halifax to Toronto once on the train. I can tell you, if there is one thing the experience wasn't it is "humane". It took at couple of days for the earth to stop rocking back and forth beneath my feet after I got off the train. lol


gary douglas
said
0 0

Of course as usual the mainland of Canada wins again. From Nova Scotia to British Columbia. As our province of Newfoundland & Labrador doesnt have a railroad we will not see any benefits out of this expenditure.

Todd Hagar
said
0 0

They can waste all the money on the typewriter they want it will never replace the computer now. Via Rail is a typewriter. Invest in a new computer. Magnetic highspeed passenger rail service. 300 mph on dedicated tracks that only serve major hub points so you feel you're getting somewhere and not on a milkrun. Don't waste your money.


Rob Z
said
0 0

This funding is going to be useless until the Harper government realizes that we need high-speed rail in this country! Right now, it's faster to take the car, for crying out loud! Even from Toronto to Montréal, it can take up to 5.5 or 6 hours, while one could drive in 4 or 5 hours! It's even worse on The Ocean line, where a Moncton to Montréal train ride takes 15-16 hours, compared to 9-10 hours by car!

And not to mention, a high-speed rail line from Montréal to Toronto would make taking the plane unnecessary (at 300 km/h, it would take 1.5 hours on the same route by train)!


Alex
said
0 0

Like many of the comments on this story suggest, there needs to be a lot more done to improve rail transport in Canada, like cheaper fares, more trains in the West and high speed corridors. While I completely agree with all of those ideas, I still believe that this is a start to revitalizing VIA. VIA has been completely ignored for years by the government, and this is a first step to recreating a healthy train system (the first step being some more money and the basic fact that the government is paying attention).

While I am still a New Democrat, I do applaud the government on this move.


Scott MacDonald
said
0 0

I hope some of the money goes to putting proper washrooms with SHOWERS in the large stations. In the 1980s, I did 5000 km on trains in each of China, India, and Canada, all within 3 years. Guess which was the most uncomfortable? With a 16 hour layover in Winnipeg it would be nice to be able to take a shower. 5 days from Halifax to Vancouver washing up in a 12" sink was ridiculous!


rob o.
said
0 0

Actually, in response to what people may think.. smaller dash-8 and regional jets, like Porter flies (and I have no affilitation to them)
are more environmentally friendly than via rail trains.. and they emit less emissions per passenger

increase speed of rail service or scrap it completely. Via Rail is stuck in the 70s.

Via Rail's slogan years ago was "people moving people" because it felt like someone was pushing the train.. that's how slow it goes..



Matt
said
0 0

I'm not a Conservative supporter, but good on them for this announcement. Train travel will make a huge comeback once oil prices make car and air travel more and more expensive...you'll see!

Victor
said
0 0

Fred Wrote:
"Those bad boys move at around 300 - 350 km/h. That's Ottawa - Montreal in 20 minutes!"

That is incredible and to think of all those folks that would keep their cars in the driveways. I wished our media would talk about real issues like this instead of high shock stories all the time.

People just don't know about things sometimes.

Electoral reform got $ 8.6 million and a tonne of coverage, and that money and time should have been better managed.


richard
said
0 0

More money for Quebec and Ontario. Fat chance any of this money will be used to restore service elsewhere


Richard
said
0 0

How about building a route between Calgary and Edmonton? I recall there being a Alberta provincial report saying that such a route would actually make money...


Alex V
said
0 0

I was hoping for an announcement like this “We will finance a High Speed Train” from Quebec City to Detroit in order to reduce traffic and pollution on Highways along the Saint Lawrence Seaway transportation corridor. But no, everything goes to cover loses of this Crown corporation which every one of us knows they are money vacuum machines from health, education, environment portion of the federal budget. A change on Parliament Hill is required perhaps for this thing to happen.


Elwood
said
0 0

I agree with Susana. I like trains, but why they need more funds when the private bus operators won't have a penny? If VIA is operated as a crown corporation, it needs to serve all of Canada, not just businessmen travelling from Toronto to Montreal. I can catch a bus almost anytime for a way cheaper rate and the bus will arrive on time. No need to reserve your seat neither and you board the bus when you're ready to. Sorry, the real problem with VIA, it is the way they think before the search for additional funds. Improve the current service, then new passengers will take these trains and they will generate new funds to expand service. I doubt new PUBLIC funds will generate a higher ridership.


Geoff Capp
said
0 0

This year's the 40th anniversary of hi-speed trains in Japan. Shame on Canada for being 40 years behind Japan. 10 or 20, but not 40! Perhaps we could buy their proven technology, get some guts and acquire land and build them here - including Lethbridge to Edmonton & further.


Ryan
said
0 0

Great news for VIA, but talk to me when it costs less than $240 round trip from Toronto to Ottawa. Ridiculous.


John H.
said
0 0

Banff, Calgary, Medicine Hat, Regina, Thunder Bay, Saint John, Fredericton, Sydney and Sherbrooke should all see service restored.

These cuts back in 1990 were shameful and have had a long-lasting environmental impact.

We also need to see the schedules for the frequency of existing trains increased.

And the tracks should be improved so speed can be increased as well.

High speed should be built for the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal and for the Calgary-Edmonton corridors.


tan
said
0 0

For anyone in Saskatchewan to even use Vis Rail, there is only 1 place to get on or off. Now isn't that handy? If I'm going to drive 5 hours to use it, I'll drive 2 and fly, instead.


Dave C
said
0 0

How about restoring service to Calgary and Regina?


Archie
said
0 0

As a retirie who lived through the birth of VIA this sounds wonderful. We former employees struggled for years with under funding.


John Andrusiak
said
0 0

I am waiting to hear about the funding for VIA in Alberta. Last time I checked - folks out here were contributing "rather" substantially to Canada.


George
said
0 0

Perhaps the cost of train travel could be reduced and thus take another car off the eastbound/westbound 401.
Taking a family of 4 by train to Ottawa or Montreal is similar in cost to flying to Europe.

Fred
said
0 0

"This isn't to announce the high speed link"

This country is begging for a good high speed train system. The corridor from Quebec city to London and Winsdor would benefit greatly from an ICE (Inter City Express) train similar to the ones in Europe!

Those bad boys move at around 300 - 350 km/h. That's Ottawa - Montreal in 20 minutes!


Roch
said
0 0

Via Rail provides an enviromentally friendly way of efficiently moving passengers, while removing congestion from Canada's over taxed highway system.

This is an excellent investment by Canada's New Government on an environmental basis, to restore the funding slashed by the previous Liberal government.


Lynn Hooymans
said
0 0

Perhaps more revenue would be realized if Via Rail Service were re-established along the north shore of Lake Superior!
Many people miss this mode of transportation very much.


Brian
said
0 0

More money down the sewer. And we wonder why we work for the Feds for the first five months of every year.


Susana C.
said
0 0

Oh good - does that mean train stations will re-open and we can actually buy tickets at them instead of chasing all over to try to get one from some local store that never opens?????? And will the Toronto North route get Saturday service finally? A lot more folks would take the train if they made it a tad easier to use.


Mark
said
0 0

I just hope they earmark some of the money to improve the condition of the tracks. All the time we hear about derailments and the 3rd world condition of the tracks.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Abby Maryk, Dominic Maryk

Missing Winnipeg siblings found in Mexico

More  1 Video(s) 1

Residents survey the damage caused by a force one tornado in Saint Benoit, Que., Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Tornadoes cause millions in damage in Quebec

More  1 Video(s) 1

Wind damage following a storm in Ottawa is shown on Friday, May 25, 2012. (Bob Antonietti / MyNews.CTV.ca)

Ottawa man struck by lightning dies in hospital

More