Canada -
News Sections
Ottawa to unveil tough national drug strategy
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Sep. 30 2007 10:46 AM ET
The Conservative government is set to announce its $64 million anti-drug strategy next week in an effort to clarify its get-tough approach to illegal drugs in Canada.
Health Minister Tony Clement said Saturday that the plan will show that the government is "back in the business of an anti-drug strategy."
"In that sense, the party's over,'' Clement told The Canadian Press.
The new strategy will focus on a combined prevention and treatment initiative with harsher penalties for illicit drug use and a crackdown against drug smuggling at the border.
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day will join Clement for the announcement, which is one in a series of Conservative initiatives expected in next month's throne speech.
"There hasn't been a meaningful retooling of our strategy to tackle illicit drugs in over 20 years in this country,'' said Clement.
Marijuana use
The Conservatives quashed a bill from the previous Liberal government decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana shortly after coming to power last year, despite support for the resolution in the House of Commons from every other party.
Since then, drug-related arrests have spiked dramatically across the country with a number of Canadian cities reporting arrest increases by more than one-third.
Toronto, Vancouver, Ottawa and Halifax all reported increases of between 20 and 50 per cent in 2006 of arrests for possession of cannabis, compared with 2005 statistics.
Police forces said many people believed the Liberal bill had passed, prompting users to spark up in public without fear of reprisal.
As a result, thousands of people were charged with criminal offences that would have been classified as a misdemeanour under the previous Liberal government.
Legal experts argued earlier this year that inconsistencies in Canada's marijuana laws made it difficult for the justice system to handle the sudden influx of possession cases brought before the courts under the Conservative government's new focus on enforcement.
Clement says the new Tory plan will work to clear up any uncertainties about the use of illicit drugs.
He said previous governments in Canada have been sending the wrong message about drug use.
"We're going to be into a different world and take tackling these issues very seriously because (of) the impact on the health and safety of our kids.''
Safe-injection sites vulnerable
In the past, Clement has vocalized his opposition to harm reduction strategies like safe injection sites, where nurses provide clean needles and safe havens to illicit drug users.
At a Canadian Medical Association meeting last month, Clement was quoted saying "harm reduction, in a sense, takes many forms. To me, prevention is harm reduction. Treatment is harm reduction. Enforcement is harm reduction.''
Advocates say the sites help to prevent the spread of deadly diseases like AIDS and Hepatitis by reducing the number of needles shared.
Dr. Keith Martin, a British Columbia Liberal MP and former substance-abuse physician, agrees with penalties for people who sell illegal drugs but wonders why the Conservatives would target users, a strategy proven to be unsuccessful in other countries.
"I can't understand why the Conservatives are embracing a war-on-drugs approach that has proven to fail,'' Martin told CP.
"By all means, go after the pushers. By all means, absolutely go after the organized crime gangs that are the real parasites in this situation... But for heaven's sake, treat the user as a medical problem and adopt the solutions that have proven to work in other countries.''
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Archie
said
Ian
said
Secondly if you have an open mind about this without the usual anti-Conservative bias clouding the issue, then you would realize that there are already a great number of resources being spent on the dealers and pushers. It's ridiculous to make it illegal to sell drugs, but not illegal to buy drugs. Both are inter-connected, don't you think? ...
S. Baldock
said
Matt
said
The more dangerous the substance, the less it makes since to abdicate the market to crooks who sell unregulated, untaxed drugs of unknown potency, purity and provence to anyone of any age, any time anywhere, no questions asked.
Health and safety of our kids? Adults looking to score illegal drugs, for medicinal purposes, are well-advised to ask any teenager.
Jesse Otteman
said
If the purpose of "safe" injection sites were to help people get off these self-destructive drugs then that would be acceptable. But as long as people are using safe injection sites to shoot up with no intention of quitting then you end up with tax payer funded abuse of drugs.
Why should the average tax paying Canadian allow the government to take their money only to give it to people who want to shoot up and who have no intention of quitting their illegal drug use? That's sheer irrationality.
Scott
said
GP
said
This is a no brainer, criminalizing pot is beyond stupid and its negative long term impacts will be too great to justify any perceived benefits… I’ve yet to see any real tangible benefits of criminalization for simple possession.
Dann
said
David
said
One who knows
said
Sean Horvath
said
Doug
said
But, a couple of good points by other posters.I agree that for $64 million it can't be much. It would be easy to use that up in re-hab programs alone.
Secondly, I don't have a problem with stiff sentences for people pushing and running labs to make drugs.THey are killing people and families.
And finally,I don't smoke marijuana,so legal or otherwise,it really doesn't make a big difference in my life.But,if the idea is to go back to the "reefer madness" mentality of the last century,count me out.
I voted Conservative the last time,for the first time in my life. I was planning on voting Conservative the next time. No,I don't need or want to smoke pot,but any policy that tries to put it in the same league with hard drugs will tell me a lot about this government.It might lead me to believe that maybe it is run by the religious right after all. To that,I say NO!!
Greg
said
Jean
said
unconcerned
said
Bruce
said
Why not criminalize a more destructive drug like alcohol? Or a more addictive drug like nicotine?
Imagine the funds saved if authorities redirected their energies from busting people for smoking weed in their homes. Imagine the lives that wouldn't be ruined by criminal records for possession of a joint.
Reactionary types tend to get hysterical when people try to explain the relative harmlessness of grass. They keep equating it to the heavy stuff. They won't even listen to a reasoned argument. It's a holdover from a dark period of the last century when some paranoid raver frightened governments into banning the evil marijuana.
right now!
said
Russell
said
This has NOTHING to do with making American politicians happy. Prime Minister Harper has always made decisions in the best interest of Canadians. He is an exceptional leader, makes the tough calls and is prepared to defend his record. If only more people had the conviction that he does we might actually have some faith in our own society.
Bob Rudachyk
said
Don Greggs
said
WM
said
I don't smoke or drink but I'd far rather be in front of or behind a driver who's had some pot.
Why not look at Hawaii's medical marijuanna laws? The plant is a medicinal herb which should be respected. We all know it was legal until Dow etc. pushed to have it banned.
People I know on medicall marijuanna get relief from all sorts of conditions, including anxiety......I've watched and seen it make a world of difference in their lives.
I think those with the privitized prison theories are right....and definetley those with the 'kiss kiss bush' opinion.
mikel
said
trish
said
ET
said
These guys just don't get it. The problem isn't with the guy that smokes a spliff once in a while...it's with the guy shoving a needle up his arm, or doin lines, or smokin meth, and this isn't how to deal with them. Marijuana is NOT the root of all evils. Go after the large scale, leave the little guy alone, and ever hear of "overcrowding"?
And yes, Terry, there are a LOT of people who relax that way once in a while. This could actually cost Stephen Harper the next election. Let's hope it does.
Brendan
said
Ryan
said
Most drug laws are made at the state level in the United States. Possession is a state crime and has nothing to do with the federal government. If you are transporting drugs across state lines, it becomes a Federal matter. George Bush has little to do with American possession laws. It would be nice if some of the rabid anti-American Canadians would learn about the US legal system before bashing it.
Tess B
said
PC + Mari legal = $$ and success
said
It's sad that cigs and alocohol are abundant but a little marijuana is branded in the same court as heroin, cocaine, and meth...
This could be the reason Harper does NOT get a majority.
I don't want to give him one after this crap.
One good thing is that this will not pass in parliment, all the other parties will vote it down.
Al
said
Ron
said
LL
said
larry
said
Tony
said
IMPAIRED DRIVING kills and yes almost half the impaired driving in this country is from illegal drugs.
Bob Smith
said
In the US - the biggest lobby organization to support mandatory jail sentences are the private prison operators.
Ross
said
Chris
said
Mario Juana
said
However, this supposed "anti-drug" strategy is completely absurd! Filling the courts with recreational marijuana users does nothing for Canada. The effects of marijuana are less harmful than alcohol, and do not create aggressive behaviour.
Focus our resources on stopping hard drugs dealers, and on helping addicts get off the real drugs.
Another issue is that good and productive citizens are being declared criminals. For goodness sake, I am a candidate for the priesthood, and even I like to light up once in a while.
The conclusion – let’s follow scientifically proven anti-drug policies, use our resources more effectively, and leave innocent citizens to smoke in peace.
Vince M
said
The disturbing thing is in most cities I'd get a bigger fine for smoking a cigarette in a private club than for public drug abuse.
Phil
said
Why should there be any different treatment for those arrested for possession? Does a woman who is "just a little bit" pregnant get any different treatment? No, they should either serve their term or take the treatment.
The same goes for those who make the choice to become addicted to drugs - and yes, they all made a conscious decision to take that first hit or rock. If the treatment is available they should take it. Helping them CONTINUE their addiction is what is criminal.
Vince M
said
We have to make this habit at least as disgusting as cigarettes.
Randy Warren
said
CWS
said
Martin
said
Just like someone else... KISS KISS USA - let's keep the white house happy.
Forte
said
Damien
said
Oggie
said
Keep the fear alive Steve, it's your only shot.
Ian
said
JOHN
said
John
said
Michael Kelly
said
I propose that we have better seizure laws. Once convicted, a drug dealer loses all of his/her assets and serves hard time in a northern work camp. After that if the criminal is not a Canadian citizen he/she be automatically deported, no appeal.
Julia
said
And geez... We could use that money in other places.
Keith Perlin
said
That's criminally stupid.
Tim
said
Terry
said
David
said
Throwing people in jail for drug use doesn't stop them from taking drugs. If we treated marijuana the way we treat alcohol and tobacco, by regulating it and taxing it, its use would likely diminish, and the criminal side of it would all but disappear. Once something is legal, criminals can't make any money off it.
Bill
said
kiss kiss
Earl Robert
said
Matt
said
athena
said