Canada -
News Sections
Census reflects Canada's changing family portrait
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Sep. 12 2007 9:53 PM ET
Canada's latest family portrait is far from traditional as mom and dad are no longer heading up the household. Now, common-law couples, single parents and even same-sex couples are taking the reins, according to a Statistics Canada report released Wednesday.
Two decades ago, married couples made up 80 per cent of families. In 2006, that number plunged to 68.6 per cent.
At the same time the number of single parents and common-law couples heading up families has increased significantly. Twenty years ago, common-law couples made up 7.2 per cent of families while single parents headed up 12.7 per cent of families.
Today, common-law partners make up 15.5 per cent and single parents make up 15.9 per cent.
About 23 per cent of all common-law couples in Canada live in Montreal and Quebec, the study reports. Between 2001 and 2006, the number of common-law partners increased 20.3 per cent to make up about 44.4 per cent of the national total.
"It really does have a lot to do with the fact that it's much more acceptable to live together before you get married and in a lot of cases, people don't bother getting married because thre really isn't any cultural imperative on them to do so," said Kathy Lynn, a certified family educator, speaking with CTV's Canada AM Wednesday.
"It really isn't a surprise when you think about it," she continued. "We don't see it as a big problem."
Even the single-parent family portrait is changing. The study found the number of men heading up their families alone increased at twice the rate (14.6 per cent) of women (6.3 per cent).
However, women still remain the dominant single parent at about 80 per cent compared to only 20 per cent of men. That's because women are more likely to get custody, Lynn said.
Same-sex married partners made the most gains, boasting a 32.6 per cent increase between 2001 and 2006. That was five times the pace of traditional opposite-sex married couples.
They represented 0.6 per cent of all couples in Canada in 2006.
This was the first time the census counted same-sex married couples in their survey, reflecting Canada's decision to legalize same-sex marriage across the country in 2005.
Half of all same-sex couples live in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Toronto had the largest same-sex couple families.
Kids leaving home later in life
Kids continue to stay at their parents home, or return to it, for longer periods of time, the study showed. This is a trend that has steadily grown for the past five years.
- 43.5 per cent of 4 million young adults (20-29) lived with their parents in 2006 compared to 41.1 per cent in 2001
- Young adults living in Saskatchewan (31.8 per cent) and Alberta (31.7 per cent) were the least likely to stay living at their parents home in 2006. The largest proportion of young adults living at home were found in Newfoundland and Labrador (52.2 per cent) and Ontario (51.5 per cent).
- Toronto is the city that has the highest percentage in the country of kids living at home. Nearly six in 10 (57.9 per cent) young adults lived with their parents, well above the national average of 43.5 per cent.
The trend could be due to a number of issues, said Anil Arora, director general of the census program at Statistics Canada.
"(They could be) staying in school a little bit longer, waiting a little bit before they form a relationship, a union, it could be because of financial difficulties," he said in an interview from Ottawa with Canada AM.
In total, the census enumerated 8,896,840 families in 2006.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
V
said
Chris
said
Rob
said
Goldee
said
Garret
said
Thats why I made the example of 20 years ago. Your 1969 example is almost 40 years ago. If you wanted to go back even further, $50 a week was a lot of money back in 1905. Then again, paying $10 for a popcorn and soda at the movie theatre was unheard of as well.
Back in the 80's and on onward, average incomes have not kept up with inflation. Even within the past 5 years alone, the cost of living has skyrocketed. In Ottawa 5 years ago, you could have purchased a descent single home for $140k, now that very same house goes for $290k, and I will not even get into hydro and gas prices, let alone other areas like Alberta and Toronto. Yet, wages have remained mostly the same since that time.
I am not trying to say that either side is right, just that those who read these comments should not feel bad for their current situation if they constantly give it their all. Those parents know that their children are striving for more, and don't mind helping them out.
That, and I was just making a bad joke about the tradition of how the parents always tell their kids how easy they got it. My Grandfather used to do that to my mother all the time, and her to me =). I had no desire to offend anyone.
John
said
Brenda
said
Also, a lot of kids would be homeless if they lived away from home.
Dennis
said
Pull up your socks and quite blaming the government and society for your lack of ambition.
MB
said
Averil
said
Mike
said
TT
said
Mary
said
Joe C
said
I was fortunate to have a good-paying summer job, so I can afford to live away from home. For all I know, that could change, and living at home or asking my parents for money may be my only option. My point is that it's nothing short of insulting when people like Steve, Al and Daphnie make sweeping assumptions about my generation when they don't know the entire picture.
Tim
said
Al
said
Mum
said
My eldest daughter is in college, still living at home and just got a job to help us out. I am unable to work and costs of living even as a couple in our 40's is difficult, so she went out and got a job to help the family.
Not all young people have it all. My children do not have all the game systems. They have one that is very outdated and cost next to nothing.
They don't ask for anything and I feel horrible for not being able to provide them with certain things but that's life sometimes.
So please don't bash every young person.
Garret
said
To all the younger adults not in the ideal income situation, I wouldn't pay much attention to the comments being made by the older readers. I bet if we went back 20 years, and told our young adult counterparts that they have to pay $20k a year for education, $800-$1200 a month for rent (not including activities), $1/litre for fuel, and other ever
increasing costs *hydro etc..* while making basically the same income, that they would throw a fit, only to have their older peers say the EXACT same thing as they now preach to us. Seems to be a circle and tradition that keeps getting passed on. Mabye we could
relate more if we had fish in our platform shoes.
Mum
said
One is still in high school but I have one 20 yr old that is still home and I'm fine with that.
I don't understand how some parents can say they can't wait til their children leave home. THat's just not me.
I was out on my own at 16 and was very independent.
Young people today staying home so long I believe is down to the insecurities in the world. Kids today are raised to almost be afraid to leave the house and understandably so... it's a scary world, especially for women.
It's obviously also down to the expense of moving out today.
The price of rent alone is outragious.
I know of a young woman who is sharing a house with 3 other girls and they each pay $600./mth rent!
Al
said
Firstly, I realize that all young adults are not lazy ok? there is proof right here on this forum gauging from some of the posts, but it takes many to affect statistics and statistics show that more and more young adults are staying home longer! that being said there is a defensive flavour to most of your posts like you're being attacked and you respond with your own versions of the truth.
For instance "there were more jobs available" to me way back then compared to now? Ontario is presently showing huge growth, low inflation rates, and more financial avenues for people to get an education than ever before. Way back when I was looking for work, a very small percentage of the population had a post secondary education, so most of us had to work "60 or 70 hours a week" to make ends meet.
It's no different today than it was then, if you want to get ahead you have to pay your dues and if you happen to pay a little more than the next person, you'll get ahead a little faster than they will. Better get used to it because it probably won't change in the future either.
Amanda
said
GW
said
PS – I love having them at home and they can stay as long as they like.
Karen
said
Fred
said
Po
said
Kids should suck it up, work/study 70 hours a week for 4-5 years and at the end of it have the tools to start a sucessful career while they're relatively young. I'm 25, so I didn't do this when tuition was cheap, I live in Quebec, so I pay taxes through my teeth and I went to school in Ontario (engineering), so I paid the high tuition fees. Oh, and no bursaries, because although my parents didn't pay for all of my education or anything like that, they are well off and that's what matters for most bursaries.
Daphnie
said
Raymond
said
sls
said
Jon
said
Gary
said
Joanne
said
Mel
said
Carolina
said
Anne
said
* Hard to get a start right out of university with a huge debt over their heads
* Unable to find a decent paying full time job to cover rent, utilities, debts from school, transportation, and various other expenses.
Perhaps, the "child" has chosen to stay with their parents to help them out if they're approaching retirement and having difficulties themselves. Seniors do not receive what they deserve in a pension to help them survive. Many will have been put on fixed income and their standard of living will have declined. A lot of retirees will eventually live below the poverty line. Perhaps their children have decided to help them, as their parents helped them through the formative years of their lives.
In some circumstances, it has nothing to do with the parents and how they brought up their children. In other instances, yes, the child might feel they deserve to maintain the same lifestyle.
So, before judging someone for staying with their parents longer, remember every person is their own unique individual that will differ from others' in society.
Gina
said
Amanda Robertson
said
Baby boomers aren't all retiring when they reach retirement age. Jobs aren't available in many fields for people without experience as result. Starting out isn't as simple as taking responsibility, there are other circumstances that play a part in everyone's life. To generalize that EVERY person of this age group is used to a certain standard of living that is quite assuming. I have worked at least one job for the past 10 years though it has generally been two jobs or more and went to school full time just to live.
Kelly
said
In many countries young adults stay at home because of strong family units and the need to assist their families.
Sadly, in Canada it just boils down to money, money, money.
scott
said
Alex Sz
said
Jay
said
It is an attitude of kids expecting to have their parents' living standard when they move out, plus this attitude of feeling they don't have to work for it, that makes me leery about my generation.
Don't blame capitalism for this - blame liberalism's quest to remove responsibility from our lives.
Zach
said
Al
said
Doni
said
Nick T
said
Ed
said
damien
said
Steve
said
Eric
said