Canada -   

1
Conrad Black departs the federal courthouse with his wife Barbara Amiel, centre and their daughter Alana Black, right, after his detention hearing in Chicago on July 19, 2007. (AP / Jerry Lai) Barbara Amiel pulls her husband Conrad Black away from his lawyer Edward Greenspan as they leave a court in Chicago following his bail hearing on July 19, 2007, in this combination photo. (CP / Tom Hanson) Reporters talk with Conrad Black's attorney Edward Greenspan, right, after Black's detention hearing a federal court in Chicago on July 19, 2007. (AP / Jerry Lai) Edward Genson speaks to the media outside the courthouse in Chicago Thursday, July 19, 2007.

Conrad Black free on bail while awaiting sentence

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Joy Malbon on Black's limited freedom
10p_black
CTV News: Paula Todd follows the money trail
10p_black2
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents with Black's lawyers
DM19_black_chat10
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents detail the decision
DM19_black_chat
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents debate the decision
DM19_black_chat9
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents on Black's travel restrictions
DM19_black_chats7
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents on the appeal prospect
DM19_black_chat11
CTV Newsnet: Paula Todd shares her legal analysis
DM19_black_chat12
CTV Newsnet: Tara Burke, Ryerson University
MM_black_chat
Canada AM: Jacob Frenkel, former U.S. prosecutor
CAN20_black

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (21)Add Comments Facebook   

Date: Thu. Jul. 19 2007 8:42 PM ET

A Chicago judge has granted bail to Conrad Black, handing him a small legal victory almost a week after he was convicted of three counts of fraud and one count of obstruction of justice. But he'll have to stay in the U.S.

Black will now remain out of jail on his initial US$21-million bond as he waits for his Nov. 30 sentencing hearing.

"He's going back home instead of the 'iron bar hotel,' which is not a place you want to go to," Hugh Totten, a Chicago lawyer who has been monitoring the trial, told CTV News.

However, Black's passport is in the court's possession and his travel is restricted to the northern district of Illinois or the district in Florida, where he has a large Palm Beach home.

Court filings state Black owes more than US$10 million in mortgage principal on that property, but lawyers have said he's been able to pay the interest.

Judge Amy St. Eve said she'll have another hearing on Black's assets on Aug. 1, and will decide then if he can travel to Toronto.

"The Toronto door has not been shut completely, so we'll be back on Aug. 1," said Black's Canadian lawyer, Eddie Greenspan. "The judge just wanted more information on assets."

Black had no comments for the media as he emerged from the courthouse, but smiled as he made his way past the throng of reporters to a waiting car.

His lawyer Eddie Genson also refused to comment on the ruling. Asked if he was happy, he simply replied: "I'm always happy."

The former media baron originally faced thirteen charges, including one for racketeering, but was cleared of nine last week.

On Thursday, the prosecution revised Black's potential sentence from 24 to 30 years in prison, and argued he was a clear flight risk and should be immediately put in jail.

Lead prosecutor Eric Sussman argued Black had violated his bail by failing to pay the mortgage principal on his Palm Beach home.

"Mr. Black's word is literally not worth the paper it's printed on," Sussman told the judge.

Greenspan argued his client would freely return to Chicago for his Nov. 30 sentencing hearing if he was allowed to travel back to Toronto, and even offered to personally accompany his client and hold on to his passport.

In the end, Judge St. Eve concluded there wasn't enough evidence to suggest Black would run.

"(Black) is extremely lucky," said Stephen Komie, a defence lawyer. "For the government to lose twice on the question of him being a flight risk, that's very unusual. On two occasions they've failed."

Greenspan argued his client would freely return to Chicago for his Nov. 30 sentencing hearing if he was allowed to travel back to Toronto.

Greenspan even offered to personally accompany his client and hold on to his passport.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Black won't receive any special treatment should he attempt to return to Canada.

In 2001, Black renounced his Canadian citizenship in order to enter the British House of Lords after a dispute with former prime minister Jean Chrétien.

Harper added that Black would free to use normal avenues to attempt to return to Canada.

The Globe and Mail also reported Thursday that Chicago-based Hollinger International Inc. and Toronto-based Hollinger Inc., two companies that Lord Black previously controlled, hired investigators more than a year ago to assess his personal wealth.

The companies are suing Black for hundreds of millions of dollars relating to alleged improper payments and his recent guilty verdicts on some of the questionable dealings has strengthened their claims.

The newspaper also reports that the U.S. Justice Department has informally probed Black's international assets and is aware of the Hollinger searches.

Prosecutors have already alleged that Black has not offered full disclosure to the court regarding his financial holdings -- an issue that could impact the possibility of him receiving bail.

Meanwhile, in an email to CTV News, juror James Kirby said "it was more than specifics" that led to the guilty and not guilty verdicts for Black and his co-defendants. Kirby said it was the "totality of events" that also influenced the verdicts.

Kirby also said the testimony of prosecution witness David Radler, Black's former business partner, was important but held the same weight as "the testimony from all witnesses."

With a report from CTV's Joy Malbon and files from The Canadian Press

1

Add New Comment ( )

DVisser
said
0 0

Why does no one seem to remember WHY he gave up his Canadian citizenship? It was because a small-minded, arrogant prime minister tried to block him from getting a Lordship from the UK. While he certainly regrets the decision now, Black would not have given the citizenship up except for that. While I can't condone everything Black has done, we have a right to expect much better from a prime minister than such vengeful pettiness.


Kevin B
said
0 0

Conrad Black will be on top again! In fact I sense this is all part of a great autobiography ..."Thru difficulties grow miracles" By Conrad Black 2010
I will surely enjoy reading that one as I have reading Nixon!

All the best Conrad!



Charleen Zaleski
said
0 0

I understand Mr. Black has a valid visa which would allow him to enter Canada but he does not have a passport in his possession. Is a visa really valid without a passport backing it up? Without a passport he could not re-enter the UK, and supposedly not even the US. I'd like to know what the law is regarding this.


Mark
said
0 0

I'm with Max... justice has not been served as yet. He still has the right to appeal. And if he should be found not guilty on appeal?

Let's not get the tar and feathers out just yet.


Louise Belisle
said
0 0

How can US Judge St. Eve decide “if he can travel to Toronto"?

She doesn't get to decide ... she can give him back his BRITISH passport but whether he is allowed entry to Canada is a Canadian decision based on Canadian law (IRPA).

Mr. Black RENUNCIATED his Canadian Citizenship – essentially he threw it away in favour of being Lord Fabulous. He is no longer a Canadian Citizen and therefore no longer entitled to any privileges that Canadian Citizenship carries.

As far as Canada is concerned, Mr. Black is a Foreign National, and based on IRPA he is INADMISSABLE to enter Canada due to serious criminality as he is a convicted felon.

It angers me to think that there is any contemplation or possibility that “he can travel to Toronto" – no – no – no – he chose a Title instead of Canadian Citizenship – fine – live with that.

He made his bed .. now he gets to sleep in it … across the pond … in the UK but not in Canada – remember he threw that one away.




Ann Packham-Fenwick
said
0 0

The reason there's so much interest in Conrad Black's dilemma is because many hard-working people, in their mid-life careers, were turfed ruthlessly from their jobs when Black et al took control of Argus Corporation in the late 1970s. My brother, a senior executive at Standard Broadcasting, was one of the casualties. He never really recovered, financially or otherwise. I have no doubt that many others suffered the same fate in the ensuing years at the hands of Black and his partners. It's called "getting rid of the deadwood." Now Black, ruthless and mean-spirited to the core, has met his retribution and a lot of people are absolutely delighted! Yes folks, the old adage is true: What goes round comes round.


Ben
said
0 0

No sympathy from me. He threw his citizenship away, and then screwed a bunch of shareholders out of their money. I don't want him to come back, and I'm glad he got what he deserved. He's a crook.


James
said
0 0

Make him pay back any funds that he may have stolen, with interest, then let him go. Turn the other cheek. Whats the point of incurring any additional expenses by housing him in a prison. After all he really is a first time offender, and its not like he killed anyone. Besides he will ever be trusted to run another company bigger than a chip wagon anyway. Let him pay back the money, and then we can all move on to be better people... Revenge is for losers.



Brian Jenkinson
said
0 0

If Lord Black should go anywhere send him back to England, Canada was not good enough for him then so why give him a break now. I did not agree with a lot of what Cretien did but this time he was right.

CEConrad
said
0 0

Mr. Black is big news because he was an important business man in Canada for a very long time. In fact, the Black family has a long history in the Canadian business world. And although Mr. Black has committed criminal acts this is the ending of a renowned Canadian business career and family. Second of all, Mr. Black will not be allowed back into Canada because of his criminal conviction. This is the law of the country. And as for Canada being too lenient, I'm glad and proud that we are "too lenient." I like being a citizen of a nice country.


Dave Lynch
said
0 0

Black made his bed and now must lie in it. He freely renounced his Canadian citizenship and insulted Canadians with his comments at the time. He only re-applied for citizenship after he was charged. He obviously only wants to become a citizenship because we have more lenient sentencing laws. Let's not let our justice system be used by a rich, convicted, opportunist.


lynne
said
0 0

I am proudly Canadian, having gained citizenship after emigrating here from the UK. As Conrad Black values so little the honour of being Canadian, I will be most disappointed if he is allowed to return. I will also be disappointed if my former country does not revoke his citizenship. Let him remain in the States for ever


Victor Palermo
said
0 0

Compared to the derelicts that ran Enron & Worldcom, Conrad is a choir boy. Give the guy a break!



said
0 0

I'm not a lawyer but I believe the rules are if a non-Canadian citizen is convicted of a felony in the US they cannot enter Canada. If this is in fact the law, Mr. Black should not be granted access to the country he himself rejected.



said
0 0

I'm glad you feel as though this is a waste of all our time considering the next article is a tribute to "The Sopranos".
He was a major canadian icon. Sure he's a fraud, but an icon none the less. That's why the media talks about him.



said
0 0

Why is this news item under Canada? Conrad Black in NOT Canadian and his case is being tried in the US.



said
0 0

Why are we spending so much time on Mr. Black? He is not Canadian, he gave up his citizenship to enhance his ego as a British Lord. I have no sympathy for him and I think our news coverage is a waste of your and my time.


nelum
said
0 0

What's wrong with me? I did not agree with what Mr. Black did and it was wrong.

I am however pleased that he got bail and hopefully he will get to travel to Toronto. Soon.

Yes he was bombastic, arrogant pompous etc etc. But he clearly is talented and more than anything --- one of a kind.

He'd better pay but I'll be sad to see him go to jail. So I'm relieved in a weird kinda way.

I am no capitalist.


nelum
said
0 0

oh on another note.. someone said to me.. around the time that Paris Hilton was in and out of jail -- his idea was that Paris Hilton should be sent to a desert island along with Conrad Black.

and that it would be the ideal sentence.


dr.z
said
0 0

Max's email, is no.1 and should be no.1 for his mature and compassionate views. I am truly appalled at the smallness, and vindictiveness of some of the other remarks. Everyone makes mistakes - remember that. And don't be so quick to condemn. The man was a giant in some ways and he made some very big mistakes. However, I sympathize with him. Better to be like Black than that rat fink Radler who sold his honour to the devil, betrayed a friend, and lied and lied, and lied. I hope Black wins his appeal.


Max
said
0 0

Today it is Conrad Black; tomorrow it may be somebody else. Give the man a chance to fight for justice before talking about striping him of Order of Canada or preventing him from reclaiming his citizenship. Let’s always remember that young girl by his side throughout the trial; she may be you or me.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV.ca Special

Conrad Black

Conrad Black

From jury selection to closing arguments: Testimony highlights and key events.

CTV.ca Interactive

The Verdicts

Black Verdicts

Complete list of the verdicts in the United States vs. Conrad Black et al.

CTV News Exclusive

Conrad Black Jury

A Juror Writes

An email exchange with James Kirby, juror in the Conrad Black trial.

CTV Broadband

The Verdict with Paula Todd

The Verdict with Paula Todd

Paula Todd and a panel of legal experts debate the court’s decision to grant Conrad Black bail.

Today's Canada Stories

Minister of Finance Jim Flaherty speaks during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, February 7, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Cuts to elderly benefits years away, says Flaherty

More

A new home for the community of Attawapiskat is seen 300 km away from its destination.

Homes finally headed to Attawapiskat

More

Air Canada planes land at Pierre Elliott Trudeau Airport

Air Canada reaches tentative deal with machinists

More

Most Talked about Stories

I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.

Shelley

W5: How far would you go to save your child?