Canada -
News Sections
Anti-Terror Act flawed, Khawaja lawyer tells court
Canadian Press
Date: Monday Sep. 11, 2006 11:13 PM ET
OTTAWA Terrorists should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, says the lawyer for terror suspect Momin Khawaja, but not under the "mockery of parliamentary legislation'' that is the Anti-Terrorism Act.
Khawaja, the first Canadian charged under the act, is seeking to have the laws declared unconstitutional on the grounds they're overly broad and vague.
The 27-year-old Ottawa software developer appeared in an Ottawa courthouse Monday -- the fifth anniversary of the 9-11 terrorist attacks -- under heavy security. SWAT teams patrolled the courthouse corridors which had been swept for bombs, and visitors to the Superior Court passed through metal detectors.
Lawyer Lawrence Greenspon, representing Khawaja, noted the Sept. 11 anniversary in his opening address and said terrorists must be prosecuted.
But he argued that the act rushed through Parliament in 9-11's aftermath is an attack on freedom of expression, of association, of religion and amounts to what Greenspon called a "criminalization of politics.''
"The 9-11 terrorists who have nothing but contempt for these ideals would be only too pleased to hear that everything has changed,'' he told Justice Douglas Rutherford.
Greenspon said Canada has a long history of rushing to restrict rights during times of national stress but asked Rutherford to resist these politically popular measures, which he said usually resulted in belated apologies from the government after the fact.
"I ask the court respectfully not to follow the Canadian pattern,'' said Greenspon.
Khawaja was charged in 2004 with seven counts under the anti-terror act in relation to his alleged role in a British bomb plot. Seven alleged co-conspirators, all Britons, have been on trial for months in London.
Khawaja's trial is not scheduled to begin until January.
User Tools
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.
Email