Canada -   

1

Ex-Groupaction employee plans to sue feds

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Alain Richard, former Groupaction Vice-President
CANAM04-martha-jury's out
CFCF News: Todd van der Heyden on Richard's lawsuit against Ottawa
CFCF04_richard

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | Print Facebook   

Date: Thu. Mar. 4 2004 11:31 PM ET

A former vice-president at Groupaction, one of the advertising firms implicated in the sponsorship scandal, says he's launching a class action lawsuit against Ottawa to recover lost taxpayer money.

Alain Richard told Canada AM Thursday that Prime Minister Paul Martin's government is not putting enough effort into recovering the money lost in the scandal.

"They should take into consideration that there was fraud, and we need to know where the money went and we want our money back," Richard said.

Richard has created a website to announce his lawsuit and says several thousand Canadians have written in over the last 24 hours, wanting to join. The website is called www.jean-paul.ca, named after Martin and his predecessor, Jean Chretien.

A statement on the website estimates that "the friends of our government owe more than $50 to each Canadian." Richard said he will file the suit once a certain number of names have been collected, though he wouldn't reveal the number.

The government has called a judicial inquiry headed by Quebec judge John Gomery, to find out who was responsible for the misspending in the $250-million sponsorship program. As well, a special counsel has been appointed to try to recover the lost funds.

Richard says he believes the inquiries and committees will be a waste of time and will never be able to get real answers.

"I don't think there's really going to be a conclusion. There's going to be a lot of paperwork, but no paper trail. And it's going to last years and cost millions of dollars to taxpayers."

Richard said he was vice-president of Groupaction's corporate branch but was not involved in the government relations division implicated in the sponsorship affair. He has said that shortly after he started asking questions about the allegedly phony invoices, he was let go from the firm.

Richard says though he lost his job in 1997, he was already seeing signs of big money rolling into Groupaction by the time he left.

"I saw the key players coming into the agency, smiling and I knew what was going on. It was obvious. You don't need a master's degree like I have to add up the dollars," he says.

The former Groupaction VP says he also recently sent a letter to Martin, offering to tell his story. But he says he has received no response.

"They're probably having a hard time finding the letter. And I'm not an Olympic medallist so I guess I cannot put enough pressure on the government."

A Martin spokesman would not confirm whether the letter was received but says the government is "very appreciative that people are coming forward."

"We want to assure them that every letter we receive in this matter will be forwarded to judge Gomery and to public inquiry officials," Justin Kingsley said.

Richard added he has received threats since coming forward, including threatening phone calls at night.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, arrive in the rain at the legislature in Regina on Wednesday, May 23, 2012.  (Paul Chiasson / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Charles, Camilla present Jubilee Medals in Regina

More   10 Comments 10    9 Video(s) 9

Facing massive criticism, Quebec's education minister says she is open to negotiations.

Quebec government says it's open to talk with students

More   86 Comments 86    8 Video(s) 8

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks at a news conference on Parliament Hill, Wednesday, May 23, 2012. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Feds poised to legislate an end to CP Rail strike: Raitt

More   81 Comments 81    9 Video(s) 9

Most Talked about Stories

This short piece illustrates perfectly the problem with the adversarial legal system, where the idea of actual guilt is irrelevant to all participants in the pantomime. I support the vigorous defence of a person's rights, but also grasp why lawyers come across slimy. It's hard to look crystal clear and clean when you provide your services on a foundation of one set of acceptable lies against another.

Frank Buchan

Skurka's Spin: Lawyer's job is to act as client's advocate