News Sections
Snowbirds grounded over ejection seat problem
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Jun. 14 2009 1:32 PM ET
Canada's famed Snowbirds aerobatic team has been grounded just as air show season gets underway because of a technical problem with the aircraft's ejection seat system, raising yet more questions about the safety of the aging fleet.
The air force has put all of its CT-114 Tutor jets on "operational pause" after a pre-flight check detected a problem before a practice flight on Friday at the Bagotville International Air Show in Bagotville, Que.
Sub-Lieutenant David Lavallee, of 1 Canadian Air Division in Winnipeg, said Sunday that the problem was detected in a component of the ejection seat system called the Ballistic Disconnect Link, which is designed to come apart if a pilot ejects from the aircraft.
Lavallee said the exact nature of the problem is still unclear, but the fleet will remain grounded until an investigation by the air force's director of flight safety is complete.
"This is just a precautionary measure to ensure the safety of our people while the investigation is being conducted," Lavallee told CTV.ca in a telephone interview.
The grounding affects all 25 of the air force's CT-114 Tutors, but it does not affect any other air force operation or mission, he said.
Lavallee said he did not know if the Snowbirds have been forced to cancel any upcoming appearances.
According to their home page on the Defence Department's website, the Snowbirds are next scheduled to take to the skies on June 17 in Baddeck, Nova Scotia.
"It's unfortunate that this type of thing happens during the air show season, but at the end of the day our top priority is always the safety of our personnel, the passengers and also the spectators at air shows," Lavallee said. "So the investigators are going to take whatever time they need to look at the problem thoroughly and make any recommendations and take any actions that they feel are necessary. We're just not sure how long it's going to last."
The team usually has a packed schedule of air shows that takes them across North America well into October, but their aging planes have raised safety concerns.
A Defence Department news release said the problem is unrelated to false-lock issues previously experienced with the aircraft's lap belt.
In 2007, Capt. Shawn McCaughey died after his seat belt malfunctioned when he was flying upside down during an air show rehearsal in Montana, causing him to fall out of his seat and lose control of the jet.
Experts have raised concerns that the jets are jeopardizing the safety of pilots because they are about a decade past their best-before date.
The planes began flying in 1963 and first appeared in air shows in 1971.
Defence Department officials have said they would like to keep the planes in the air until 2020, which will cost about $100 million in repairs and upgrades.
However, as far back as 2003, military officials recommended the planes be immediately replaced.
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This is just wrong but if I were to send something to the politicians I would have sent the brain!
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Fast Boy
0
said
0
1. The tutor ejection seat isn't new. It has embodied a number of modifications to fix issues found over the years, but is still old.
2. T-33's haven't been built since the 50's - the last rolled off the production line in 1959. Ours were licence built by Canadair and had Rolls Royce Nene-10 engines in them.
3. Hawk instructors are military, not contracted. We have pilots from the member nations' militaries teaching on them, plus exchange pilots from other nations' Air Forces as well.
4. The CF does not own the Hawks, so 'buying more' would require a brand new contract with Bombardier, who also doesn't own the airplanes, and is trying to get out of the military contract business. Plus, the unit cost for the Hawk 115 is about $24 million, notwithstanding maintenance, infrastructure, and so on. It would be great to see it happen, though, as the Hawk would be a great demonstration airplane.
Nick
0
said
0
Ottawa Soldier
0
said
0
The last CT 133 came off the line in 1958. We kept the T-Bird around because it was a tank. It was used as an EW platform, for target towing (Banner) and as a taxi.
I suggest you do some research before you criticize everyone else.
Dale in SK
0
said
0
tdgladwin
0
said
0
And to replace the tutor jets with the T-33 would not be any more of an advancement and in fact would actually give them even more serious safety problems while performing a few of their tip and roll stunts which has been the cause of the T-33's to stall in mid flight.
No the answer here is to build something completely more advanced and up to date with current aerodynamics and there are a few manufacturers out there that do have some projects in the works that the government and the air force could look at that would be great replacement jets for some of the best pilots in the world to continue doing what they do safely and seeing how much money and attention that they bring to this country it is high time that the government looked at doing something for them without looking at just the cost.
DDfrmKAF
0
said
0
You need to check your facts. The T-33 has been out of production for decades.
The Hawk is a good replacement suggestion. P.S. I have back seat time in a T-33 and do know my facts.
geebee
0
said
0
BMM
0
said
0
JB in Ontario
0
said
0
Tono
0
said
0
The T-33 was produced until 2005, according to what I have read.
According to another website, the T-33 was viewed as a possible replacement for the Snowbirds' Tutors.
You people should do some research. The least you could have done is suggested a better alternative
geebee
0
said
0
What happened to all the surplus F-5s they had in mothballs? All sold to the Dogpatch Air Force by the Chretien crowd?
Remember it was the Liberals that canned the Golden Hawks and were embarrassed into forming an aerobatic team for the Centennial year. The usual media generated slop about costs "aging" yada yada will be picked up by the Granola and latte crowd. Go plant a tree.
Paul in Brantford
0
said
0
The Hawk is the logical replacement for this old bird and the aerobatics will not need to change much if at all.
John
0
said
0
Peter Termehr
0
said
0
Peter
0
said
0
DG
0
said
0
Ann
0
said
0
Al
0
said
0
jack schleihauf
0
said
0
observer Natty, ON
0
said
0
Fred Apple
0
said
0
To Keep em going - The aircraft structure is old BUT the ejection seat are alot newer.
murman
0
said
0
You want the Tutors replaced with an aircraft that is even more obsolete? Interesting.
Surely you jest.
Paul
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Becky of Calgary
0
said
0
Tono
0
said
0
DG in SK
0
said
0
Keep em going
0
said
0