Top Stories -   

1
A CT-114 Tutor plane from the The Canadian Forces Snowbirds, 431 Squadron Air Demonstration Team flies over Comox, B.C., on April 16, 2008. (Canadian Forces / MCpl Robert Bottrill) Canada's elite Snowbird squadron flies over Parliament Hill in Ottawa for Canada Day celebrations on Tuesday, July 1, 2008. (Tom Podolec / CTV Toronto) A CT-114 Tutor plane from the The Canadian Forces Snowbirds, 431 Squadron Air Demonstration Team flies over Comox, B.C., on April 16, 2008. (Canadian Forces / MCpl Robert Bottrill)

Snowbirds grounded over ejection seat problem

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Rob Brown on the operational pause
Canada's 'Snowbirds' have been taken out of operation. All 25 aircraft used by the acrobatic flying team have been grounded due to a technical problem that could endanger the lives of pilots.
CTV News Channel: Aviation analyst Mark Miller on the ejection seat problem
Canada's aerobatic flying team 'the Snowbirds' have been grounded due to a problem with the airplanes' ejector seats.
CTV News Channel: Retired Col. Michael Drapeau, former director, Department of National Defence
Canada's aerobatic flying team the 'Snowbirds' has been grounded because of a technical problems with the aging fleet.
CTV News Channel: Jets on 'operational pause,' says Department of Defence
The Department of Defence says all 25 of the Snowbirds' tudor jets will be on an 'operational pause' till the problem is fixed.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (28) Facebook   

Date: Sun. Jun. 14 2009 1:32 PM ET

Canada's famed Snowbirds aerobatic team has been grounded just as air show season gets underway because of a technical problem with the aircraft's ejection seat system, raising yet more questions about the safety of the aging fleet.

The air force has put all of its CT-114 Tutor jets on "operational pause" after a pre-flight check detected a problem before a practice flight on Friday at the Bagotville International Air Show in Bagotville, Que.

Sub-Lieutenant David Lavallee, of 1 Canadian Air Division in Winnipeg, said Sunday that the problem was detected in a component of the ejection seat system called the Ballistic Disconnect Link, which is designed to come apart if a pilot ejects from the aircraft.

Lavallee said the exact nature of the problem is still unclear, but the fleet will remain grounded until an investigation by the air force's director of flight safety is complete.

"This is just a precautionary measure to ensure the safety of our people while the investigation is being conducted," Lavallee told CTV.ca in a telephone interview.

The grounding affects all 25 of the air force's CT-114 Tutors, but it does not affect any other air force operation or mission, he said.

Lavallee said he did not know if the Snowbirds have been forced to cancel any upcoming appearances.

According to their home page on the Defence Department's website, the Snowbirds are next scheduled to take to the skies on June 17 in Baddeck, Nova Scotia.

"It's unfortunate that this type of thing happens during the air show season, but at the end of the day our top priority is always the safety of our personnel, the passengers and also the spectators at air shows," Lavallee said. "So the investigators are going to take whatever time they need to look at the problem thoroughly and make any recommendations and take any actions that they feel are necessary. We're just not sure how long it's going to last."

The team usually has a packed schedule of air shows that takes them across North America well into October, but their aging planes have raised safety concerns.

A Defence Department news release said the problem is unrelated to false-lock issues previously experienced with the aircraft's lap belt.

In 2007, Capt. Shawn McCaughey died after his seat belt malfunctioned when he was flying upside down during an air show rehearsal in Montana, causing him to fall out of his seat and lose control of the jet.

Experts have raised concerns that the jets are jeopardizing the safety of pilots because they are about a decade past their best-before date.

The planes began flying in 1963 and first appeared in air shows in 1971.

Defence Department officials have said they would like to keep the planes in the air until 2020, which will cost about $100 million in repairs and upgrades.

However, as far back as 2003, military officials recommended the planes be immediately replaced.

Comments are now closed for this story

Fast Boy
said
0 0

I'm an Air Force pilot who has flown the Tutor, T-33, Hawk, and CF-18, and want to pass on a few facts for everyone.

1. The tutor ejection seat isn't new. It has embodied a number of modifications to fix issues found over the years, but is still old.

2. T-33's haven't been built since the 50's - the last rolled off the production line in 1959. Ours were licence built by Canadair and had Rolls Royce Nene-10 engines in them.

3. Hawk instructors are military, not contracted. We have pilots from the member nations' militaries teaching on them, plus exchange pilots from other nations' Air Forces as well.

4. The CF does not own the Hawks, so 'buying more' would require a brand new contract with Bombardier, who also doesn't own the airplanes, and is trying to get out of the military contract business. Plus, the unit cost for the Hawk 115 is about $24 million, notwithstanding maintenance, infrastructure, and so on. It would be great to see it happen, though, as the Hawk would be a great demonstration airplane.


Nick
said
0 0

The Tutors are a symbol of the Snowbirds and it would disappoint many people if they were ever taken away, even if was for the best. I may not know much about air planes but couldn't they just use new parts to replace the rusty ones?


Ottawa Soldier
said
0 0

Tono: I worked on the T-33 over thew course of my career in Comox, Bagotville, Cold Lake and Shearwater. The 4 CT-133 was officially retired from service when 414 sqn stood down in Comox in 2004.

The last CT 133 came off the line in 1958. We kept the T-Bird around because it was a tank. It was used as an EW platform, for target towing (Banner) and as a taxi.

I suggest you do some research before you criticize everyone else.


Dale in SK
said
0 0

Gov't after gov't has wasted money on so much useless stuff over the years. Why can't they once spend money on something that Canada can be and is proud of. I agree with DG in SK let Bombardier biuld them. It'll create work and keep jobs in Canada. After all they can throw money away at the auto sector.


tdgladwin
said
0 0

They are one of the countries biggest attractions out side of the RCMP musical ride,and all efforts should be made to make sure that the aircraft they use in their performances is of the best in current technology as to protect them and all of the fans at the air shows.

And to replace the tutor jets with the T-33 would not be any more of an advancement and in fact would actually give them even more serious safety problems while performing a few of their tip and roll stunts which has been the cause of the T-33's to stall in mid flight.

No the answer here is to build something completely more advanced and up to date with current aerodynamics and there are a few manufacturers out there that do have some projects in the works that the government and the air force could look at that would be great replacement jets for some of the best pilots in the world to continue doing what they do safely and seeing how much money and attention that they bring to this country it is high time that the government looked at doing something for them without looking at just the cost.


DDfrmKAF
said
0 0

No No Tono
You need to check your facts. The T-33 has been out of production for decades.

The Hawk is a good replacement suggestion. P.S. I have back seat time in a T-33 and do know my facts.


geebee
said
0 0

If the T-33s were produced up to 2005, who did the work, where and at what costs? Share the source you "read!" The alternative to the Tutors are what's now flying not something that HAS.


BMM
said
0 0

More great investigative reporting from CTV. This problem is totally unrelated to the plane's age. The ejection seats in use are new. They were installed in 2006 and are widely used in other aircraft. As for the BAE Hawk, Canada does not own any. They are contracted along with the flight instructers that fly them and train our pilots. That siad they would be a good replacement for the Tudor.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

The Snowbirds' team's safety is most important. It will be a mixed emotions day for me when the Tutor will be replaced in the airforce as I have enjoyed watching the Snowbird's perform!


Tono
said
0 0

To everyone who is commenting on my comment:

The T-33 was produced until 2005, according to what I have read.

According to another website, the T-33 was viewed as a possible replacement for the Snowbirds' Tutors.

You people should do some research. The least you could have done is suggested a better alternative


geebee
said
0 0

The T-33s are older than the the Tutors. Remember the Red Knight? He wasn't flying a Spitfire!
What happened to all the surplus F-5s they had in mothballs? All sold to the Dogpatch Air Force by the Chretien crowd?

Remember it was the Liberals that canned the Golden Hawks and were embarrassed into forming an aerobatic team for the Centennial year. The usual media generated slop about costs "aging" yada yada will be picked up by the Granola and latte crowd. Go plant a tree.


Paul in Brantford
said
0 0

Totally agree with Peter.

The Hawk is the logical replacement for this old bird and the aerobatics will not need to change much if at all.


John
said
0 0

Let the show go on. It's great for kids and overall connection between country and people. Get them new birds. After 40 years, come on...it's time. Safety First. BAE Hawk...good choice. Oh yeah...replace the sea kings. This is not a banana republic.


Peter Termehr
said
0 0

It's time to replace or discontinue the Snowbirds show, before another Canadian Air Force Pilot meets with an accident. They deserve better


Peter
said
0 0

The CT-155 Hawk is the Canadian Forces' current advanced jet trainer. It is still in production(they can buy new ones) and a good choice for use since there is a support infrastructure in place already.


DG
said
0 0

ummm- Tono - they officially retired the T33's back in 2004 - there's a few kicking around as test aircraft but that's it...


Ann
said
0 0

I think that the Snowbirds are a well needed. Whether the government knows it or not. It does spread patriotism of the Canadian people. For some stupid politian who is out of touch with the people to say it should be shelved, well. It just goes to show how the politians have no clue about the people who elected them.


Al
said
0 0

Why not replace the Snowbirds with the BAE Hawk? The CF already has some in service. Buy some more. In the event of major hostilities in could be used in a light strike and air defence role.


jack schleihauf
said
0 0

This is nothing new, it's been like that for years.


observer Natty, ON
said
0 0

I'm not opposed to Snowbirds doing "Demonstration Flights", but "Aerobatics" claim more lives of our Pilots than "Showing-Off" is worth.


Fred Apple
said
0 0

To Tono - The have retired the T-33's from the miltary.
To Keep em going - The aircraft structure is old BUT the ejection seat are alot newer.


murman
said
0 0

"I hope that the T-33 will replace the Tutors."

You want the Tutors replaced with an aircraft that is even more obsolete? Interesting.
Surely you jest.


Paul
said
0 0

They should switch to Sea Kings!


Bob
said
0 0

Is this even news-worthy? Really?


Becky of Calgary
said
0 0

I agree because they are old and the stunts they perform require precision accuracy. There have been a couple of serious accidents to consider.


Tono
said
0 0

I hope that the T-33 will replace the Tutors.


DG in SK
said
0 0

I don't see why the government doesn't replace them. Pay Bombardier to build new models. Heck, they give them so much taxpayer money anyways, may as well at least pay them to build something that will be well used and needed.


Keep em going
said
0 0

It's time to get new jets. They are obviously too old. But keep the team going...


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest