News Sections
Inquiry into police shooting of Mtl. teen on hold
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. May. 25 2009 12:55 PM ET
A coroner's inquiry into the police shooting of a Montreal teenager was put on hold Monday after nine of the 15 interested parties failed to show up at court.
Fredy Villanueva, 18, was killed last August in a north-end neighbourhood of Montreal while officers were attempting to arrest his older brother Dany.
CTV Montreal's Stephane Giroux said two of the men shot by police in the same incident were among those who did not attend.
"Their excuse was that they could not afford a lawyer," Giroux said.
Although Villanueva's brother was present, his mother did not attend, citing medical reasons.
Coroner Robert Sansfacon said Monday in court that the inquiry could not begin because it was unclear whether the two men who were shot and Villanueva's mother still wanted intervener status.
Meanwhile, several human rights groups have boycotted the inquest, saying its focus was too narrow.
They are unhappy that the inquiry will not look at other issues such as racial profiling, police accountability and youth poverty.
Giroux said the proceedings were put on hold until the afternoon so that Sansfacon could sort out how to best move forward.
Details of incident
Montreal police reported officers were trying to arrest Villanueva's brother when they were surrounded by a group of youths.
A prosecutor, who examined the report filed by provincial police, said the officer who shot Villanueva acted to save himself and his partner when they were set upon by some of the youths.
Officers Stephanie Pilotte and Jean-Loup Lapointe had originally approached the group because they had spotted them playing dice in a public place in violation of a municipal bylaw.
The investigation concluded that Dany Villanueva, the brother of the dead teen, initially refused to identify himself and resisted violently when police tried to arrest him.
Four witnesses said Villanueva reacted aggressively to police.
Police also said members of the group kicked a female police officer as the officers tried to subdue him.
Lapointe felt hands grabbing him around his body and close to his gun and pepper spray. He fired four times, hitting Fredy Villanueva twice and wounding two other members of the group.
Rioting and looting ensued throughout the neighbourhood on the night after Villanueva's death.
Images and photos of police officers Pilotte and Lapointe have been order to remain under a publication ban after Sansfacon said threats had been made against the officers.
After the shooting last August and the riot that followed, the Villanueva family filed a $990,000 civil suit against the police and the City of Montreal.
The inquiry was called after prosecutors announced that the officer who shot Villanueva would not be charged. They concluded he acted with justified force.
Meas and Metellus also filed a suit for $810,000.
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This short piece illustrates perfectly the problem with the adversarial legal system, where the idea of actual guilt is irrelevant to all participants in the pantomime. I support the vigorous defence of a person's rights, but also grasp why lawyers come across slimy. It's hard to look crystal clear and clean when you provide your services on a foundation of one set of acceptable lies against another.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Montrealer
0
said
0
MRC in Ontario
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Carl in Ottawa
0
said
0
I’m the first one to side with the civilian when it comes to police brutality but these kids attacked and swarmed police officers! What were they expecting? If the officer had pulled out a taser and the killed someone by accident then they would still be seen as the bad guys. Same if they had broken someone’s arm with a baton or sent someone into anaphylactic shock by using pepper spray. I’m sure some of their actions were “embellished” for their report but in the end they have enough self control not to fire into a crowd of kids for no reason. Swarming armed police officers = not a good idea!
ComposMentis
0
said
0
Matt
0
said
0
Steve-QC
0
said
0
Police are there to protect the public. They are not mind readers. Ignore what they ask, then you get whatever they deem fit to subdue you.
Dave in Ottawa
0
said
0
Frank Furter
0
said
0
What transpired after that is the result of teens that were never brought up with proper morals, and respect, knowing right from wrong.
1) You do not kick or punch or push a police officer unless you want to go to jail. In fact you can't push, punch or kick anyone for any reason. That is called assault.
2) You absolutely never, ever go for a police officers gun or weapon. One of the most important basic training a police officer gets is to protect their sidearm at all costs.
To end, paraphrasing you David, shame on all those teens parents for never teaching them right from wrong. Shame on those kids for thinking they could physically attack a police officer. Shame on you for trying to defend these thugs and youths that have been brought up by bad parenting and acting the way they do.
schpid
0
said
0
People were doing something illegal. Petty in most of our minds but still illegal. When the police appraoched them they didn't give their names and became beligerent. They then attacked the POLICE. In the struggle, one of the officers felt someone grabbing at items on his/her duty belt including a gun. Right there the situation escalated not by the police but by these others who chose not to follow OUR rules. I hope that in addition to exposing every bit of the officers lives and training this inquiry also pulls apart the lives of these "victims" and shows them for who they really may be.
The death in this is totally senseless but there is plenty of blame outside of the police to go round
Sandie
0
said
0
EM
0
said
0
A university degree in psychology should be mandatory. We already pay them enough to support this additional educational requirement.
Situations like these are the reason the police have a hard time getting the help of communities to solve real crimes. (Like that little girl shot in Toronto)
The police have always been a group of politically and physically powerful thugs who are not held to the laws of us simple Canadians.
You always hear of police officers wading into a situation, immediately and forcefully imposing their will. If you dare ask a question or attempt to stand up for your rights BEWARE.
Remember.. when an officer approaches you in the confrontational manner that they always do.... do exactly what they say regardless of your awareness of your rights . You'll have a chance to have your rights defended in court.
If you can not afford a lawyer you have no rights.
P.Q. Public
0
said
0
Now its a huge tragedy.
If you've got nothing to hide, answer questions that police ask of you. If you do have something to hide, tough.
David in Ottawa
0
said
0
S.B.
0
said
0
A concerned citizen
0
said
0