Top Stories -   

1
Protestors stage a sit-in at BBC Broadcasting House in London, on Monday Jan. 26, 2009. (AP / Anthony Devlin) A Palestinian student stands in a damaged classroom at the Balqis school for girls in Gaza City, Monday, Jan. 26, 2009. (AP / Khalil Hamra) A Palestinian student wears a headband displaying pictures of weapons on the first day Rafah elementary school reopened in Rafah refugee camp southern Gaza Strip, Saturday, Jan. 24, 2009. (AP / Eyad Baba)

Sky News, BBC won't broadcast Gaza charity appeal

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Tom Kennedy on the ad controversy
The U.K.'s much revered 'BBC' is caught up in controversy over an aid appeal for the people of Gaza. The public broadcaster and another major news network are refusing to air a TV fundraiser designed to help people in the Palestinian territory recover after the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas militants.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (18) Facebook   

Date: Mon. Jan. 26 2009 10:35 AM ET

The British Broadcasting Corporation is standing firm in its decision not to air a desperate plea for donations to help those living in the bombed-out remains of the Gaza Strip.

On Monday, another British channel, Sky News, joined the BBC by announcing that it was also refusing to broadcast the appeal.

The ad was submitted for broadcast by the Disaster Emergency Committee, which includes the Red Cross, Oxfam and Save the Children.

The BBC decided not to air the ad following deliberations held over the weekend, said CTV's London Bureau Chief Tom Kennedy.

"It is saying if it does broadcast this film appealing for aid for the victims of the Israeli bombardment of the Gaza strip, it will in a sense be compromising its journalistic impartiality, not only it's journalistic impartiality but the appearance of it," Kennedy told CTV Newsnet.

The decision has triggered a powerful emotional response in the U.K. Roughly 60 MPs, including some cabinet ministers, have criticized the decision.

Several high profile religious leaders, including the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, have also opposed the decision.

More than 11,000 complaints have been filed to the BBC, and a number of protests have been held in opposition to the decision, Kennedy said.

Those who oppose the BBC's decision say the humanitarian appeal must be aired in order to generate much-needed funds to help Palestinians recover from the heavy fighting.

More than 1,200 Palestinians were killed in the bombardment, and hundreds of homes and businesses were destroyed.

Israel launched the three-week offensive in order to halt Hamas rocket fire into southern Israel.

Other British broadcasters, including Channel 4, ITV and Five, have said they intend to broadcast the ad.

Comments are now closed for this story

Christian, CBS, NL
said

I think that the decision by BBC is a good one. It shows that they are not showing Bias towards Hamas.


Kevin in Alberta
said

good for them. I agree.


Rachel in Sask
said

These are internationally respected charities, not political props. They're appealing for aid for Palestinian civilians. This is not "taking sides", it's the harsh reality of the conflict. Gazan civilians have been disproportionately affected: that's simply a fact. I would expect the same response if this crisis had happened in Israel, or any other country.


Sean Bush
said

The problem with almost all humanitarian aidis that it very rarely gets tothe people that need it the most! So when the BBC refuses to broadcast an emergency aid appeal for Gaza it is not the people that it is targeting it isthe group of officials that run the Gaza Strip! Hamas is not only a political organization but a terrorist one as well and is on numerous terrorist organization lists in many countries. When you donte to causes alot of the time the controling powers in a region get the aid first with very little actually going to the people. So give your head a shake people. The BBC doesn't want to be associated with a terrorist organization!


MHB
said

To Sierra: "except that BBC doesn't normally run ads. they are publicly financed, the only "ads" they run are for thier own content." Where did you get this info from?. The BBC has actually been airing humanitarian aid appeals for the same UK Disaster Emergency Committe (DEC) for 46 years!. This is the FIRST time they let them down!.


Saladin
said

The pretext of nuetrality is not valid here because humanitarian aid is related to the Palestinian civilians who are suffering now and has nothing to do with the warring factions (Israel and Hamas). Actually, the decision not to air the appeal is a strong statment of bias against the Palestinian people!. Shame on BBC and on any media that would block calls for helping the suffering innocent civilians!.


Sierra
said

except that BBC doesn't normally run ads. they are publicly financed, the only "ads" they run are for thier own content.

so making an exception to air an "ad" produced by a third party absolutly compramises thier journalistic unbias. Unless of course they are going to brodcast a similar ad for the families on the Isreali side that got their homes destroyed by the Hamas rockets.

Sky has no excuse however


Cathy
said

Searching on you tube I have come across quite a few charity appeals for the people in Gaza.

Images or war are very dominant...just as they would be for any country as a victim of war...to me a victim is any innocent person who loses something where it be a home or a life.

The BBC has been one sided in so many stories...why are they afraid to broadcast this ad?

If it was an Isreali ad promoting the same thing...would their stand be the same?




Shawn in Montréal
said

Hypocrites!

The BBC aired both Live Aid and Live 8. What’s the difference?

It’s innocent people in the midst of a humanitarian crisis, and charities seeking donations.

What’s changed now? Or rather what network sponsors have changed?


Anthony
said

I agree with Raj; if it were me I would remain neutral on the whole idea.

Besides, donate money to help the Palestinians? Good Lord we have troubles using money for ourselves to pay our debts during these times. Kinda stupid to give money to others when we can't even get ourselves out of a hole.

These guys made a good choice. I support the decision.


Jeffrey in Calgary
said

The problem T. Johnston is the BBC is turning it's back on an agreement with the Disaster Emergency Committee they have had since 1963, to provide free air time for Emergency Charity appeals.

The BBC is confusing impartiality with equal airtime.


Neutrality!
said

"I don't have a problem with this. But perhaps they are simply staying neutral"


ha ha! Just like the west always is, neutral and never biased in the Israel/Palestine conflict.


Raj
said

I don't have a problem with this. But perhaps they are simply staying neutral


YA from Toronto, ON.
said

This is great. Suppress Palestinian people with whatever possible. Recently these same broadcasters showed how many Hamas rockets landed inside Israel that prompted Israel to take action. But they conveniently forgot to mention how many Israeli strikes were carried out to target Hamas officials. They forgot to mention who many Palestinians died before this war even started as direct result of Israeli rockets.

This conflict has lasted as long as it has because it has been one sided deal from since day one. Has anyone even thought why Palestinians are fighting? They are fighting for their freedom from Israel who does not recognize any statehood for Palestinians. I wonder if Sky News or BBC have stated this fact! I wonder if Sky News or BBC have broadcasted the fact that Israel is a Nuclear armed country, despite an international nuclear non proliferation treaty. Let me guess, they probably reported this fact for Iran!!!

Our media has been too one sided for too long. This conflict has dragged on for so long because our media manipulates stories and turns whatever if likes into a monster or prince charming. So, go ahead and do not air any Palestinian cry for help. Punish them to the extent that they go mad and let everyone turn a deaf ear to them. This is what we have done thus far and there is absolutely nothing new to it. It is just the same old same stuff.

Brent
said

Unless this ad is a blanket attack on Israel with some charity flavoured sprinkles on top, it should be run.


Dana B
said

I think the BBC is actually SHOWING their partiality by not helping the Palestinians


T. Johnston
said

I cannot understand how an broadcasting a paid advertisement for a charity could be seen as "taking sides", but perhaps that's just because I haven't yet seen the ad. I look forward to checking it out on YouTube.


mike in canmore
said

"We've had our reporters there since the gates of Gaza opened. There is absolutely no question of Sky viewers not being aware of the humanitarian crisis."

Of course they did - covering armed conflict increases ratings. I'd check into who the main funders of Sky are.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest