Top Stories -   

1
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., talks to Laura Styles of Exeter, N.H., after become emotional while answering a question from an undecided voter at a cafe in Portsmouth, N.H. on Monday, Jan. 7, 2008. (AP / Elise Amendola) Republican Presidential hopeful, Mitt Romney, visits with Diana Lechance during a campaign stop at Mary Ann's Dinner in Derry, N.H., Monday, Jan. 7, 2008. (AP / LM Otero) Republican presidential hopeful and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee listens as actor Chuck Norris, right, speaks at a campaign stop in Mason, N.H. Monday, Jan. 7, 2008. (AP / Alex Brandon) Republican Presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., addresses supporters during a campaign stop in Nashua, N.H., Monday, Jan. 7, 2008. (AP / Charles Dharapak Democratic Presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., speaks at a rally, Monday, Jan. 7, 2008, in Claremont, N.H. (AP / M. Spencer Green)

Clinton says race to White House 'very personal'

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Tom Clark with her emotional moment
10p_clinton
CTV Newsnet: Jeffrey Simpson, The Globe and Mail
DM07_primary_chat
CTV Newsnet: CNN's Kate Bolduan on the big push
KB_hampshire
Mike Duffy Live: A discussion on the likely outcome of the N.H. primaries
DML07_two

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (26)Add Comments Facebook   

Date: Mon. Jan. 7 2008 5:38 PM ET

Coming close to tears, Democratic candidate Sen. Hilary Clinton told a small group of voters in a New Hampshire cafe on Monday that her quest for the White House is "very personal."

"It's not easy, it's not easy," Clinton said of the nomination race. "I couldn't do it if I did not passionately believe it was the right thing to do. It's very personal to me."

On the eve of the New Hampshire primaries, polls suggest Clinton trails Sen. Barack Obama.

Clinton -- the national Democratic frontrunner for much of 2007 -- found herself in third place after Iowa on Thursday, with Obama finishing first and former North Carolina senator and 2004 vice-presidential candidate John Edwards finishing second.

"Whatever happens tomorrow, we're going on," said Clinton.

A second loss for Clinton could seriously hurt her chances of eventually winning the Democratic party's nomination.

In New Hampshire, a three-way battle is shaping up between Obama, Clinton and Edwards, who conducted an all-night bus tour that will continue throughout today.

"While everyone else goes to bed tonight, I'm going to be out working," Edwards told an audience in Nashua on Sunday night.

In a USA Today/Gallup poll, Obama had 41 per cent support, compared to 28 per cent for Clinton and 19 per cent for Edwards. No other remaining candidate was in double digits.

At an Obama event at the Lebanon, N.H. Opera House, hundreds couldn't get in to hear the candidate speak. "You guys caught us a little by surprise," Obama told them. "You're the wave and I'm riding it."

During her appearances on morning talk shows, Clinton kept hammering away at Obama's lack of experience.

Obama "is a very talented politician", she said, but "if he's going to be competing for president -- and especially to get the Democratic nomination and go up against whomever the Republicans put up -- I think it is really time to start comparing and contrasting him as I have been scrutinized for all of this year."

Asked on CBS's The Early Show if the Iowa result showed voter disenchantment with her, Clinton said: "I'm just going to work as hard as I can today and tomorrow. ... I feel really good about this whole process, and you know, whatever happens tomorrow, we're going on."

Hillary's husband Bill lost in Iowa in 1992 before finishing a close second in New Hampshire -- even though Gennifer Flowers said she'd had a long-term extramarital affair with him. After his strong finish in New Hampshire, Bill began billing himself as "the Comeback Kid." He went on to win the Democratic nomination and served two terms as U.S. president.

Romney, McCain neck-and-neck

On the Republican side, former frontrunner Republican Mitt Romney hit the streets Monday to drum up needed support.

"We need some voters," he declared.

Romney finished second last week to Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who struck a populist chord at the Iowa caucuses last week.

Romney's main opponent in New Hampshire is Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who polls suggest is surging.

"Tomorrow is the day when we will tell the world that New Hampshire again has chosen the next president of the United States," McCain told hundreds of supporters.

In the USA Today/Gallup poll, McCain had 34 per cent while Romney had 30 per cent. Huckabee had 13 per cent support. The margin of error is 4.4 percentage points, putting McCain and Romney in a statistical tie.

Some other Republican big names like Rudolph Giuliani and Fred Thompson aren't really campaigning in New Hampshire and have looked ahead to primaries in larger states like South Carolina.

Despite his Iowa win, Huckabee dampened expectations.

"If we come in anywhere in the third and fourth slot, we're going to do great. I'd like to do better than that, but you have people who have had a lot more money spent here," he told CNN.

Some analysts suggest Romney will be cheering for Obama on Tuesday.

New Hampshire's "undeclareds" are the largest group of registered voters in the New England state, and they can vote in either primary. McCain won the New Hampshire primary in 2000 with the support of those independent voters.

Can Obama win it all?

Obama is the first black candidate to seriously challenge for a presidential nomination.

"He has a lot of money. He obviously has momentum at the moment. He's being seen increasingly as electable," Globe and Mail columnist Jeffrey Simpson told CTV's Question Period on Sunday.

"I have a friend who knows Democratic party politics extremely well who still says a black man still can't win in the South. And unless the Democrats can win a couple of southern states, they can't win the White House. We'll have more of an answer to that question in a few weeks time."

In addition, many African-Americans don't see Obama as necessarily being one of them because he's half-white and not a descendant of slaves, Simpson said.

While Clinton targets Obama's lack of experience, Simpson said Obama opposed the Iraq War from the start. Clinton voted to support the war.

Although Clinton has led in national polls, that could evaporate if more people start to see Obama as "the one," Simpson said.

On the Republican side, Simpson said the person with the most to lose in New Hampshire is Romney, who spent $7 million in Iowa only to finish second.

"Most of the population of New Hampshire is in the south. They're very influenced by the Massachusetts media. (Romney is) a former governor of Massachusetts. He'd be well-known in New Hampshire. If he can't win there I think he's finished," Simpson said.

As to who might eventually emerge as the Republican nominee, Simpson said if Romney does lose, the race will be wide open.

Giuliani has money and based his strategy on no clear frontrunner emerging out of Iowa and New Hampshire.

"Huckabee doesn't have the money, but if the evangelicals in other states get behind him, particularly in the South, he'll have the troops that he requires. McCain is considered by a lot of rank and file Republicans to be just a little too wonky," Simpson said.

With files from The Associated Press

1

Add New Comment ( )

Scott
said
0 0

Isn't Edwards Evangelical? Stop pinning that only on the Republicans. Some of you people who complain about this, need to spend more time in the US.

david
said
0 0

Of course it is personal for Hilary -- personal power only. Does America really want to see even the possibility of more Clinton scandals, wasting more time and money, when the country has more important things to solve?

Kanatian
said
0 0

The end of the right wing in the west is great news for the world. The democracies of the west are nothing more than a farce for capitalism to turn a trillion dollar profit from killing people in illegal invasions and the farcicle terror industry. Western democracies are run by coporate imperialism, not the people.

The Republicans will be utterly crushed and will be remembered for their outlandish war crimes in Iraq and the joke of an investigation into naming everyone involved in 9/11.

As will the Tories in Canada for their banal support of failed US foreign policy and fabricated terror threats. The Tories have also allowed oil companies to highjack our political system and I think that Canadians are smart enough to see that re-electing Harper is not an option unless we want more Republican rule and warmongering migrating to Canada.

We have debunked the outdated and banal religous right's views of the world and society and now to only allow them back in more deviant ways is not acceptable to a modern world.

There is a reason they are called regressive conservatives.

Saint
said
0 0

JFP. you dont want republicans to win because their base is the eveangelical right. you're right. I am myself part of the base of the conservative party of Canada and part of the evangelical right. If you think getting rid of republicans will get rid of our influence, you're mistaken my friend. Obama recently said he would listen to evangelicals if he became president. I hope that gives you an understanding of the amount of power we have.

MHB
said
0 0

I really hope that Obama wins. He was one of the few politicians who opposed the war on Iraq. Politicians like Hillary Clinton who approved this immoral war should pay a price for their shameful positions. Many around the world remember the US with ugly things like Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and the invasion of Iraq. A leader like Obama will restore the US image as the leading power in freedom and democracy.


sdgreen
said
0 0

Clinton using the 'tear' factor; why how quaint. Hillary Clinton wants power so badly it hurts. Her platform as compared to Obama is dismal. Given the Bush/Bush thing, I do not want to see a Clinton/Clinton thing.

Vote Obama.


JPF
said
0 0

The republican party has become the tool of souther evangelical christians, now they could possibly nominate an ordained minister to be a presidential candidate... They may as well just elect the pope, that's the direction they are heading. The american system is flawed, owned and controlled by lobbyists and special interest groups. And it's the entrenched politicians that allow this to occur. They need to clean house. Find the politicians that have no stake in supporting corporate lobbyists and the religious right



jacksmith
said
0 0

Bottom line:

I think Hillary Clinton must get back on that horse that brutally through her to the ground back in 1993. That horse is HR 676 (Medicare For all). Insurance mandates of any kind are totally unacceptable to the American people . Thank God. The vast majority of Americans know better than that now. They want single payer tax supported government managed universal health care free for all as a right. And they want it NOW! And they are right to demand it. The American people are suffering by the millions, and dieing by the ten's of thousands now. It's not just about everyone having coverage anymore. It's about the disgraceful quality of health care in America. Even for people with the best insurance coverage you can buy. And it has to end.

I have enormous admiration, and respect for Hillary Clinton. She fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds back in 1993. To prevent this disastrous health care crisis that is now devastating the American people, and America. She fought so hard for the American people that she risk almost completely destroying her husbands presidency. I haven't forgot her heroic effort. If anyone has reason to be reluctant to get back on that bucking bronc again, it's her.

But I think the time is now. And more importantly. I think the American people are ready to do what they have got to do. To fix our disastrous, and deadly health care delivery system. At least I hope so. For all our sakes. Hillary Clinton is right. This is not a game. It's bigger than parties, and politics. It's about the life, or continued needless deaths of millions of Americans. And HR 676 (Medicare For All) is the way to save us.


david
said
0 0

If Oprah Winfrey wants to be president, she should run herself instead of "using" Obama by proxy.


Bob
said
0 0

Obama talks about unifying the nation? Come on! Unity spoken by a politician always means you give up your values and we'll implement mine...or what part of Obama's values is he willing to sacrifice?


IveNoticed
said
0 0

At what point did Hillary drop her "Rodham" from her last name? She was known as Hillary Rodham-Clinton for many years. Now with just the Clinton name it is obvious she is doing all she can to ride her husband's coat-tail.


Anne M
said
0 0

You bet that the return to the White House is very personal for Hillary. She made the statement to the staff when they left, "I will be back" and she has held onto that goal. God help us all if she attains it.

kevin
said
0 0

Doesn't anyone remember what the Conservatives did after Mulroney left the party. Jean Charest was the favorite son to take them into the future but realizing they were going to get destroyed in the election they nominated Kim Campbell to take the bullet. This is what's happening down south right now. The democrats realize the situation the U.S. is in, there is no exit strategy for Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are going to require more military resources and there is conflict with Iran and their proxies on the horizon.
It is a much better stratagy to nominate Obama and lose the upcoming election. This tactic will solidify the black vote for the party in the future, let the Republicans continue to do the heavy lifting in the Middle East and save Clinton for 2012. It's beautiful in it's simplicity.


Elly
said
0 0

The problem with American politics is they have been 'Clinton'ized and 'Bush'Wacked for 20
years. That's a long time for the same ole same ole! America really does need someone with a different vision and why not Barack Obama. He just may be what America really needs!

Scott
said
0 0

The republicans are supporting Obama in the primaries. Republicans can beat Obama (I hope I'm wrong). Republicans won't beat Clinton.




chris
said
0 0

First African-American president... First female president... People are focussing on the wrong issues. How about, for the first time in their history, electing the person they feel would be most effective at making their nation prosperous without concocting a war to stimulate the economy? I don't see why anyone in their right mind would want to be President of the U.S. I just hope that whoever ends up in the White House finds a fast, effective, and long-lasting way to make nice with the Middle-Eastern countries, like 20 years ago fast, because I don't want to see what nuclear war looks like, thank you very much...


Davey Legasse
said
0 0

I agree...an Obama / Clinton ticket would be a winner...against anything the Republicans can throw at them...all we need is an Evangelical in the White House...the current incumbent has been scaring sensible people for 7 years now...that's long enough, let's have some optimism, hope and fresh ideas now...


Dave in Surrey
said
0 0

Clinton could win the Presidental Race...

Obama doesn't stand a chance...

Democrats voting with their hearts not their minds once again will lead to 8 more years of Republican rule...


FreakAlert
said
0 0

When the economy begins to erode at an alarming pace, starting April, and massess are effected, people are gonna start listening and understand the truth Ron Paul speaks.

2008 will be a very interesting year for everyone.






Dick Varley
said
0 0

Obama seems to be building charisma. Charisma as seen in John F. Kennedy and here in Canada with Pierre Trudeau causes the electorate to overlook both campaign and personal flaws. Therefore Obama may very well be building the surge which will take him into office. It doesn't hurt to have Oprah behind him either.

Alan
said
0 0

"I have a friend who knows Democratic party politics extremely well who still says a black man still can't win in the South. And unless the Democrats can win a couple of southern states, they can't win the White House."

I would suggest Mr. Simpson's friend look at the result from previous elections that shows Democrats making major gains in Western states like Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. That's where the future of the Democrats lie, not the cranky conservative South who would not even vote for a white Democrat anyway.


martha
said
0 0

"Socialism is killing us",

Martin's exit was due to voters rejecting the idea of allowing the Liberals another term (by the way, FDR and WLMK were both known as being procrastinators and ideologically evasive. They turned out pretty well and their respective administrations are lauded. Caution is better than blind idealism. See GWB) Yet, the minority government provided the Conservatives shows that this country is, at heart, a supporter of social democratic ideals (that is why the Conservatives have pulled themselves away from true conservatism).


Socialism is killing us
said
0 0

Obama reminds of wishy washy Paul Martin. We all know what happened to him right.


Clintons crocodile tears!
said
0 0

Hillary Clinton is unbelievable!

Now she is trying to elicit support through "very personal" tears. GIVE US A BREAK HILLARY GET OVER IT - QUICK! She is as hard as nails and we all know it. Obviously she will stoop to anything to try to get elected and it's that kind of politician we don't need anymore.


Gis Bun
said
0 0

Obama is considered "junior" when it comes to politics but has a mass appeal. Clinton has the background (personal time as well as with Bill when he was the President) but comes off as cold. In any case, the Democrats will make history, with either a black or a female for it's leader. If they were smart, they'd choose the other as running mates. Any combination is better than the Republicans in office again.


SantaCruzen
said
0 0

Obama opposed the War in Iraq before he had access to National Security data. Now, he wants to get out of Iraq and enter borders of Afganistan and/or Pakistan according to statements he has made on the news since Fall 2007.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Most Talked about Stories

No easy answer to this mess! The goverments of many nations have been over borrowing for years. People have not been much better. The old rule of you cannot spent more then you make applies to both. This whole thing is going to be a long, painful and bumpy ride. Unfortunately, no one will learn their lesson when this is over and we will be in the same perdicament 50 years from now. Most of the lessons from the Great Depression were not learned.

coopns

OECD urges Canadian interest rate hike