News Sections
Feds cut GST, slash personal income taxes
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Oct. 30 2007 10:38 PM ET
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has announced a reduction of the GST to five per cent, and major cuts to personal income taxes and corporate tax rates, in a fiscal fall update that resembled a full-fledged budget.
The total tax cuts represent about $60 billion in savings over the next five years, taking advantage of a federal surplus expected to reach $11.6 billion this fiscal year.
"Like the North Star, we are a bright light for others to follow," said Flaherty. "Canada has emerged as a shining example in an economic universe of rapid change and uncertainty. We are leading the way with our tax cuts, our debt reduction, our focused and responsible spending."
The Conservatives had promised to lower the consumption tax to five per cent in their 2006 election platform. The GST cut will be effective Jan. 1, 2008.
Other highlights include:
- An increase in the basic personal amount exemption to $9,600 from $8,929, retroactive to Jan. 1, 2007;
- Two years later, on Jan. 1, 2009, the basic personal amount exemption will be increased to $10,100;
- Reducing small business income tax to 11 per cent by 2008;
- $10 billion in federal debt relief; and
- The lowest personal income tax rate moves to 15 per cent from 15.5 per cent, effective Jan. 1 2007, undoing a change made in the first Conservative budget.
The government will also cut corporate tax rates by one percentage point in 2008. Further cuts will occur each year at a rate of one percentage point per year, bringing corporate tax rates down to 15 per cent by 2012 from 22 per cent today.
Corporate taxes will fall by one third between 2007 and 2012. According to the government, this will make Canada's corporate taxes the lowest among major industrialized nations.
"Taxes haven't been this low since Lester Pearson was prime minister," said Flaherty. "This is an achievement we can all be proud of."
The plan will be put to a confidence vote on Wednesday, putting an election trigger in the hands of the opposition parties.
Reaction
Both the Bloc Quebecois and NDP have said they will not support the government's plan.
NDP Leader Jack Layton said the fiscal update promised little that would help impoverished Canadians.
"It was an opportunity to close the widening prosperity gap. Instead, it widens that gap," said Layton.
He added that the proposals will give "$14 billion to the big banks and oil companies, who frankly don't need our money, instead of making investments in our communities."
Liberal Leader Stephane Dion said Tuesday his party will endorse the fiscal update -- avoiding an election -- but was critical of the GST cut.
"It's a big mistake," he said. "We will choose our time when we will decide to put this government down -- it will not be tomorrow."
On Monday, he had said a GST cut would not be an effective way to give Canadians tax relief.
"Compared with income tax cuts, a GST cut does nothing to improve our competitiveness in the world economy and does little to improve the fairness of our tax system, improve our productivity and move our economy forward," Dion said in a statement.
Liberal Finance Critic John McCallum said that aside from the GST cut, there were two significant measures in the fiscal update that his party agreed with.
"We certainly like the significant corporate tax cuts," he told CTV's Mike Duffy Live. "And the Conservatives had hiked income tax and now they're bringing it back down to where it was under the Liberals, so we can't object to that."
But he said that the fiscal update was too unbalanced, focusing too little on investments in health care, the environment and ending poverty.
Don Drummond, chief economist for TD Bank, said the GST cut will have a direct and immediate impact on Canadians.
"Well, if you think of an average consumer, a family spending about $30,000 a year, it would be $300 into their pocket," said Drummond.
Flaherty delivered the fiscal update in the National Press Theatre, instead of in the House of Commons as he had wanted, because the NDP didn't give the needed unanimous consent.
Past fiscal updates have been presented in front of the finance committee, and the finance minister then answered questions from opposition MPs.
With files from CTV's David Akin in Ottawa and The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV Broadband Network
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Perhaps they should look at reducing duties resellers must pay for products coming from the US to Canada in order to level the field? Then it would be prudent for the resellers to offer competitive pricing and good service to maintain a loyal customer base.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Michele
said
You don't pay GST on a house unless it is new, then you can apply for a GST rebate, unless of course your builder applies for it and keeps it.
Jay Jonah
said
John
said
Jason
said
Surely you mean one broken and dozens kept right?
RRO
said
Why did he do this? Because the Liberals have been hiking our taxes for so many years so that they could claim massive budget surpluses. Then shuffle the money to their friends in programs like the Sponsorship prgram.
IF Dion had any guts, or any real conviction he would topple the government and face the public. But he won't because all he will do, is lose more seats.
Leslie
said
Gary
said
If you think the GST cut will seriously affect your level of healthcare or education, maybe you should take closer look at things. Both health and education are under PROVINCIAL control, not FEDERAL control. If Premier Pinochio could give local healthcare centres the millions he gave to cricket clubs and other Liberal-friendly groups, you wouldn't have to wait for 6 hrs on a gurney.
I'm a blue collar worker struggling from paycheque to paycheque in a less-than-extravagant-lifestyle , thanks to nearly half of what I earn being scooped up by tax vultures. Any sort of tax cut is more than welcome, even if it only saves me a measly $50 /yr -- that's MY money that *I* earned. Add in the announced upcoming income tax, and I just might have enough at the end of a month that I can afford to fill up the tank on my little car.
Like it or not, poverty, healthcare and other such issues have been around for thousands of years, and there is yet to be a politician from ANY party on either side of the political spectrum in any country in the world that has worked out a viable solution for any of them.
Danion Brink
said
Tammy
said
Andrew
said
Allan
said
I live in Nova Scotia and would just like to remind you of two words: Atlantic Accord. Stephen Harper promised when he was campaigning to honour it and he didn't. I don't trust a word that man says or any of his ilk.
And don't forget, the Tories may form the government, but they by no means won the hearts of voters nor did they earn a majority.
Jim in the West
said
Instead of cutting the GST, I'd have liked to see targeted cuts, such as eliminating the tax altogether on printed materials.
All in all, a decent budget, and worthwhile for the Libs to support.
As for Layton, he should remeber that it was his party that put Harper in power.
Alex Sz
said
As for the NDP saying there isn't anything for the lower income. Please... More money in the hands of PEOPLE mean more jobs which will help the needy. It will also allow others to give of their time in volunteering or in donations. It is a fact that the more prosperous people are, the more they help. I am one that doesn't believe that the government needs to do every little thing for you. We do need to take care of the most vulnerable.... that's what government is for but as for the rest of it, leave me with enough money so I can hire people to do things that I need to get done. I'd rather give my extra money to people for work, than have the government take it from me and give it to others 'free of charge' in programs that can be corrupted or mismananaged. Which brings me to the liberals.... oh wait a minute, that's old news.
Bob
said
Rob
said
Steven
said
Take issue with Laytons "prosperity gap" complaint. This man can always be counted on to fight for some to have a free ride on the backs of those that pay the bills. Why he thinks those that have should carry those that don't is simply beyond me and my non- socialist mind set.
All in all, the Conservatives are doing what so many parties before have not done and that is keep their promise. Top marks for that
Jason
said
I'm a business owner. It will take me about 10 minutes to enter in a new tax code and about 20 extra minutes when doing the quarterly GST payment.
Jamie in Kitchener
said
This government seems to be doing the prudent thing, and cutting it back until it is eventually gone. Let's see how many people are STILL complaining once the GST is gone for good.
1% works out to about $300 per family on average. With two 1% GST cuts so far, I'll gladly keep my $600, thank you!
Deb in Sask
said
Richard
said
Inhaling a breath of fresh air
said
Ivan Reel
said
noel
said
JM
said
Brian
said
It's a step in the right direction, isn't it? I guess there will always be people looking at this as the glass half-empty.
I think these cuts are reasonable and they should be applauded for reducing the debt.
Tim
said
Are there other ways to cut taxes, yes - were they voted in based on those promises, no...
If you disagree, vote different next time. I find it hard to believe any of the others wouldn't have found a way to just pocket the extra cash given the history.
WJ
said
Paul
said
What a joke. So they've raised the exemption by about $600.00 which only means that's $600.00 you won't get taxed on... it doesn't mean you will get $600.00
Set that in par with inflation and interests costs on your home etc, middle and lower class are STILL BEHIND.
Wake up people... your $1.00/vote buys are adding up.
Grant Johnson
said
Rent - exempt from GST
Food - 80-90% is zero-rated
Loans - exempt from GST
Vehicle insurance - exempt from GST
This 1% cut to GST doesn't benefit me at all. Why? Because I don't have the disposable income to buy a new vehicle, a new house, a family vacation package, etc. The personal income tax will help but for how long?
Buster B.Brown
said
True blue
said
Oh.... by the way.... everyone just made a few dollars on the retroactive increase in the personal exemption
Oh.... by the way.... the personal exemption is going to increase every other year
Oh.... by the way.... they eliminated .5% of low income tax, reversing their own decision of a year ago. At least they had the courage to reverse themselves, not hide behind "economists"...
Liberals.... don't forget where the engine driving Canada's economy is right now. Alberta and oil, not Ontario and a flagging auto industry....
Donna Wood
said
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. "Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so: The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Tim, and don, you aren't overtaxed
said
kr
said
Anti-big-government
said
What we really need is a cut in the amount of government we have, so that we can cut even further the amount of income tax we have to pay. We do not need tier after tier of government employees ceating paper to justify their jobs. A good systems analyst could probably cut anywhere from twenty five to fifty percent of unnecessary tax-payer funded jobs in the Federal cicl service.
How about trying that one on, Mr Flaherty? That goes double for the Liberals and NDP who believe bigger government - hence higher taxes - is better.
PrinceC
said
# Two years later, on Jan. 1, 2009, the basic personal amount exemption will be increased to $10,100; and,
# The lowest personal income tax rate moves to 15 per cent from 15.5 per cent, effective Jan. 1 2007, undoing a change made in the first Conservative budget.
Now lets see I've highlighted the Leftist Agenda's comments in this article into a nice summary:
1) Complain about income tax rate and ignore the income tax cut by raising personal exemptions? Checkmark (done)
2) Complain again about income tax rates and ignore the percentage point drop in rate? Checkmark
3) Complain about how the poor recieve no benefit, yet the middle class pays for the ppors free services? Checkmark
4)Complain that the Conservatives are keeping
their promises, and that it's all politics, and yes it is politics, but at least they keep their promises, what do Chretien/martin Liberals have to show for it? Checkmark
5)Complain about GST and ignore the other budget highlights such as income tax cuts and person exemption rate increased? Checkmark
6) Complain that Conservatives should pay down debt instead of a GST Cut, wait wasn't that 14 billion to pay down debt which saved us 700 million plus in interest charges? Checkmark
Did I forget anything?
Robert
said
Besides, they ARE cutting the personal income tax - they're doing both. And next year personal income tax goes down ever further!! How can that be bad?? So the people who complain that we have to "spend to save" are also saving...
In my opinion, a very good move as we get the best of both worlds...
Dixie from Alberta
said
Len
said
Alex
said
Kirk
said
If you want money go earn it. This government is just giving a bit back.
marty d
said
eric
said
Concerned Canadian
said
Kent C
said
A Practical Person
said
Ian B
said
Brad
said
GST cuts are good. Personal income tax cuts are good. The economy is good. We should be cutting taxes when we have the means.
Canadians are very highly taxed for all of our "free" services. So a reduction is most excellent. Beyond that the other parties are mad because all they can do is critize when the little minority government is making great changes! Oh maybe they are mad because they actually do what they say they will. Wow what a concept... :)
Erick
said
David
said
Frederick S
said
WE DESERVE BETTER!!
Gis Bun
said
1% doesn't sound like much. Buy a $20,000 car and save $200. I'm sure they'll get you to fork over that $200 in another way.
Skip the 1%. Reduce our income taxes at the end of they year, add additional necessities that should be tax free and additional tax relief for those living in and near poverty.
Lance
said
Basic economics
Andy In Cambridge
said
I agree Kelly, it would be nice to see the GST eliminated someday, but remember, they promised to cut it to 5% over their mandate, and this is what they've done. The reality is, even though they've reduced it, it's still a source of revenue for the government
Aaron
said
Roger T
said
K
said
Phil
said
big_biso
said
Charles
said
John
said
Michael
said
Kelly
said
Ari Ukkonen
said
Terry in the Free West!
said
Thank God for these Liberal 'defenders of the Faith'.
Can't wait for Dion to force an election so we can shut these 'Chicken Little' Liberals up once and for all.
As far as the GST rebate for travellers, I just returned from a week in Texas, paid tax on everything nickle I spent. Why should Canada provide GST rebates to Americans? It's not like they don't pay taxes at home?
Come on people, try and see the glass as half full!!
DG
said
Getting our tax rates (sales tax or income tax) down to levels that are reasonably comparable to other first world nations is important.
To cut taxes of any description so low that there is no surplus whatsoever, would leave no room for a rainy day fund for large natural disasters, which can happen.
As well, not sure if anyone has noticed the 500 billion dollar gorilla in the room. Hey folks, we (all of us as citizens) still have a huge mortgage called the national debt to pay off....no matter who created it or added to it in the past. No surplus, means no extra funds to pay against the national debt, aka, mortgage.
Harper was able to put about $14 billion against the national debt for last year. Would be cool to see the same thing happen again this year. If we stay the course, or close to it, hold a bit of discipline, this country can be completely debt free by 2021.
Debt free nations have money for healthcare. Debt free nations have money for transportation. Debt free nations have money for all kinds of things.
Alex Montgomery
said
Remember the Scholarship Scandal, how about welfare fraud, payments to contractors who are friends of the government. Not to mention excessive pensions. We have short memories.
I think the Conservatives are honest and will do what they promise and my vote will always go to Stephen Harper, however give us a decent break on income taxes. Most of us as has been mentioned will not benefit one dime from the GST cut.
Craig
said
They mention that it is really hard to spend $30,000 in one year. Did you read the article, it was talking about buying a car. You've never bought a car before?
They keep saying that it is better to cut income taxes. The Conservative party has had income tax cuts as part of their election platform for the past 15 years. Flaherty has even mentioned that income tax cuts should be expected in the next budget. The media and the left seem to treat this as one or the other. The Conservatives will be cutting both the GST and income taxes in the near future.
They say that the debt needs to be paid down. It is the government's policy to use all excess surplus money to pay off the debt. In effect, it is already being done. The government has also promised to use all interest saved on the debt to pay for INCOME TAX cuts.
So before you start to criticize the government, take the time to learn about what the issues are. Don't just knock the government because you don't understand what's going on.
Owhenthelowly
said
If you are reading this, could you please remember those who live on disability pensions-who could only dream of the 30,000.00 tax bracket everyone is talking about here?
I contribute 13,000.00 to my family of 4. GST doesn't help me much because most of that goes to food- which isn't gst'd. I wish I could pay taxes. I wish I didn't feel like such a drag on our economy. I wish I could spend more on GST even though we all are supposed to pay it. I think that would feel good. But mostly, I just wish my wife could quit working one of the 3 jobs she does to try to make ends meet.
Thank you for helping our country do so well, and for your careful fiscal management. I know you are trying your best.
Owen
Linda
said
And the NDP,the people who want to fight poverty.Since very poor people pay almost no income tax,I expect they would see some benefit from a GST cut.How is it that a higher value dollar,more employment and lower taxes not a good step in reducing povery???
Check here for whining and complaining no matter what happens.
ance
said
With a potential 15 billion dollar surplus the Conservatives should take this opportunity to restore the .5 percent decrease that they took back during their first year in power.
Because the GST is a tax on consumption, it is inherently of less benefit to low income individuals than a marginal tax rate reduction.
If your income dictates that you purchase only necessities, it is unlikely that the additional 2 cents you might save on toilet paper is going to be a huge benefit.
Calgary geek
said
What are your monthly expenses?
Mario
said
Red or Blue - you just can't win.
William
said
They cut from other areas to create a surplus of money. Good fiscal management can only create so much surplus. Cutting funding might not be the popular choice but it had to be done somewhere. The liberal governement also admitted it cut to much and would start giving some back. Lets not forget with the extra surplus created by the liberals, more of our debt will be paid off which means less interest paid and more long term funding can be added else where. All these cuts by the conservatives have to be funded some way and I can only see our surplus leaving and our country crawling back into debt.
Enrique
said
Rob K
said
Here's the problem, we ALL agree we need more money in health care, infrastructure etc. etc. So, let's get all 30 million of us together in one place to decide the spending priorities of our country. We can discuss tax cuts at the same time and what form these should take. We can also discuss how much to put toward paying down the debt while we are all there.
Wait a minute...there is no where that 30 million of us can meet. Trying to get a good time for everyone to do a conference call for 30 million people would be a logistical nightmare.
It seems to me we elected a few people to represent us and help decided these issues for us and all we can do is complain, complain, complain. Look, no party is perfect (there's shocking news for you), but, we live in a great country that is enjoying the greatest prosperity of any country in the western world. If you think you can do better than the representatives you and I have elected and you think the priorities should be different, get off your butt and run for office where you can actually do something.
In my opinion, any tax cut in any form is a step forward for ALL 30 million plus of us, continuance of paying down the debt at the same time is also important and is being done. The more taxes the government cuts the more money I am willing to put back into the economy by buying items I could not afford previously. This is all good and ALL of us, no matter what our political stripe are going to enjoy the benefits. Aren't we lucky, lucky people??!!
Stop your political bickering and complaining all of you, instead reflect on how lucky we are as a people to even have the opportunity to consider tax cuts at all.
Ray
said
Dave in Surrey
said
Happy to Save 1%
said
Will you in the future purchase a:
House
Vehicle
Clothing for your self or family
Pay Utilities
Buy Fuel for you vehicle
Food
Entertainment
Christmas Gifts
School Supplies
Computer
Furniture......
the list is endless and guess what, most of the things on this list are essential to every family in Canada and are not "luxery items"
A promise kept and money saved. Next lets reduce income tax.
ED
said
Steve
said
If the system had not been changed where would the lost tax dollars have come from? You guessed it, personal income tax.
I can agree that it didn't look good on the government for what happened but the companies that caused the change also bear the responsibilty.
All I can say is that this "broken promise" which benefits all Canadians is minute compared to the Liberal promise of "Read my lips, NO GST" which they had 13 years to take care of but did nothing.
If this is the worst of the broken promises that we will see from the Harper government I can live with it, it is still way better then we ever got from the Libs.
Matt
said
Most tax cuts benefit those who make more.
Why? Because they pay most of the taxes.
Those who have low incomes or are on social assistance shouldn't complain that they aren't getting a break, they should be thankful the rest of us are spending a disproportionate portion of OUR income paying for the services they recieve.
Low income people get a lot of services from the government that they quite simply didn't pay for. I don't mind helping, I don't mind even paying for a bit more than I actually use myself. However when half my paycheck goes to taxes it's a bit too much.
Richard
said
Maintain the tax level in order to pay the debt. The log term savings will be much greater than with a debt.
If we don't pay the debt when times are good, when will we?
Hatrock
said
Brian
said
Mlab
said
Taxes should be managed to encourage the economy (household) to prosper, and eliminated only when we're completely debt-free.
Greg
said
David
said
Kathy
said
James. The Liberals accumulated a surplus by cutting funding to the Military, by cutting funding to the RCMP,by freezing the wages of Federal Gov't employees, cutting transfer payments to the Provinces (ie Health Care), etc., etc. The Liberals' surplus was not a result of Liberal fiscal good management. It was accomplished by taking away from others to benefit themselves.
Wendy Stevens
said
Sagar V.
said
Not a good move to raise rates given the value of our currency.
larry
said
Rich and poor all buy goods affected by the GST.
While a 2% reduction may not look like much, I look at it as if I buy a hundred dollar item and now the tax is at 5% rather than the old 7% and that equates to almost 30% 'less' tax.
Elliott SASK
said
But when I go buy food this month and spend my money I will remember that the GST cut does not affect me much.
SaskDave
said
Doug
said
Rob Z
said
But then again, I do understand that the Conservatives are mainly doing this (the GST reduction) in order to fulfill one of their 2006 election promises, something which I can respect.
ET
said
Over Taxed Don
said
Maybe I make more than the "average" Canadian but I also pay way above average taxes.
The only reason that we have a system in which the "poor" pay very little or nothing in income tax is because our country over taxes the middle class working family to death to compensate.
I will take any tax cut I can get, also bring income splitting too.
Dan
said
The one person said it best. I would have to spend $30000 this year to realise a $300 savings. I make $38000 and on that I pay 17% of that in income tax. Those folks are REAL dollars. If they would have cut my personal income tax by 2% to 15% then I would realise a tax savings of $760. That folks again is real dollars not these hypothetical it sounds too good to be true dollars the Tories are trying to sell us.
As for the arguement that it is unfair to those that don't pay income tax well then I'm sorry. With the ecomomy and the employment rates that we have right now in Canada maybe it's time for them to upgrade their employment situation to something that pays income tax. Besides as the illustration says they would have to spend $10000 just to save $100 and someone not paying income tax is likely not going to be spending that kind of money.
Give the coporations a tax cut and the income earners. This will be a win win.
Kevin J
said
Glenn
said
Pat S.
said
$30 000 in spending per year? Wow, must have a lot of disposable income to spend $30K per year. a 1% cut to stop me from spending in the US? HA, with the prices difference, good luck on that one!
I much prefer an income tax cut, as that has a greater effect on me and puts more $$$ in my pocket than a stupid GST cut.
Rick
said
Davey Legasse
said
Program spending is greater than ever, the rate of spending increases is much higher than GDP growth yet here we have the lefties whining again about how so much more must be spent.
Right now we've got the money to increase program funding while reducing our onerous taxes and yet the complaining continues...what a nation of whiners we are.
Shawn
said
The Conservatives said they would cut GST and they did. I would guarantee that if they didn't cut it, the majority of the people who have posted comments would be complaining that they didn't fulfill their election promises.
A 1% reduction may not mean much to most of us, and while I feel that a personal tax cut would have been better, we got a tax cut that does allow us to keep more of our money. Stop complaining and be thankful for a change.
Mike
said
Just look at whats happened to Ireland, they were borderline third world country a few decades ago now their GDP per-capita is in the top 5 in the world. Higher than USA. All because they slashed corperate taxes down to 12% vs our nearly 40%.
Im all for helping the poor but you can help them a lot more when GDP per capita is 50,000+ vs our current 36,000
Darren
said
Most middle to lower class Canadians cannot afford to buy many of these high priced retail taxable items anyway (enough to see any difference over time) When the price of anything like coffee or milk goes up again that would be enough to offset this wonderful break.
A lot of people most in need of real breaks and cuts shop where places do not charge sales tax or where goods cost substantially less.
I see it as another negative impact to higher inflation and to make the economy sizzle a little more which isn't needed right now.
Those who consume (mostly) newer products and have the money to do so are the ones that are being rewarded here.
Prices of goods only need increase 1% or 1 cent for ever dollar to eliminate this lovely 'tax break' while at the same time taking billions of potential funding out of schools and/or health care.
What good is a 1% retail sales tax break if we need to pay $50-$100 per week to have our children supervised during the full school day. In addition to this most of us pay for school supplies and fund-raising to give milk or provide adequate school supplies simply to teach properly and have healthy schools.
ET
said
$300 on a $30,000 car, and 50 cents on a $50 Christmas tree.
Oh yeah, I'm a single parent of two on welfare...and not planning on buying a tree this year. But thanks for cutting the GST! That's going to make a HUGE difference to me. And YES, I'm being very sarcastic, in case you couldn't tell.
DistinguishedFlyer
said
If, however, economic efficiency is the focus, then the GST is not a great tax to cut. Inflation is already at about 2.5%, and cutting a consumption tax will just drive it higher. The rate of saving is also very low, and making it even cheaper to spend your money rather than save it or invest it will increase this problem as well.
The best plan would be to increase the GST, (but at the same time increase the GST credit so the poor don't get hit too badly by it), and then use the money to finance large reductions in income & business taxes. Cutting those taxes would be better for the economy, while the extra sales tax would slow down inflation and increase the rate of saving. The increased GST credit would keep the system fair.
Exiled Canadian
said
On thus subject of tourism, how many folks do you think actually fill out the GST rebate form? I know many folks in the U.S. who visit Canada regularly (including myself) and they never fill out the forms because they have enough paperwork to deal with as it is on a monthly basis. Cutting the GST saves tourists a penny on every dollar they spend. That's good for tourism.
Finally, this is just the conservatives keeping their promises. If they didn't get the GST down to 5%, they would be accused by the opposition during the next election of reneging on their promises to cut it. They said they would do it so now they are following up on their pledge when they can afford it.
Don't be surprised if you do see the income tax come down also at some point in the near future. The governement is getting the job done and keeping their promises. Whether you agree with their policies or not, you have to give them credit for following up on the promises they made to Canadians during the last election.
Michel
said
Greg
said
Cyndi
said
Denis
said
Sean
said
André
said
Michael (Ottawa)
said
Anna
said
Rob
said
Julian
said
At least the Conservatives kept their promise and have reduced it from 7 to 6 to 5%. Reducing a tax that affects everything you buy can only be a good thing.
Raymond
said
shannon
said
Michele
said
"Well, if you think of an average consumer, a family spending about $30,000 a year, it would be $300 into their pocket,"
There are alot of Canadians who do not make 30,000 a year let alone spend that much on 'things' that charge GST. With most low income Canadians their biggest expanse is groceries (most not GST applicable). They could have used a income tax break.
James
said
Michele
said
In fact a GST cut just rewards consumer spending. At a time when consumer debt is at an all time high, is this really the right way to go?
It does however make perfect political sense.
Unfortunately politicains/political parties, of all stripes,
are more concerned with getting/staying in power
then what is best for Canada/Canadians in the long term.
Seeing what is happening in the U.S. with consumer debt problems we should be encouraging personal fiancial responsibilty not more consumption.
Canadians should have a break on income tax, and they can decide if they want to spend that savings or save it. You should not have to spend to save money.
"Well, if you think of an average consumer, a family spending about $30,000 a year, it would be $300 into their pocket,"
gregt
said
James
said
Personally, I would like to see the government run like a household. Pay off the debt the best you can before making any more big purchases. IE: we are surviving now let's bite the bullet a bit longer and get us out of debt. Then we can reap the benefits of a strong dollar without paying a crazy amount of interest.
Overall though, I am happy with the Conservatives. However, I am not under any illusion that the Liberals didn't start this surplus. The Conservatives are just keeping it going.
Ron from NS
said
Everyone take their spending during the last year and deduct 1%, then take all your loans and add 1% interest. You will be shocked how much you will actually lose with a 1% GST cut during a hot economy.
All the surpluses should be used to pay down the debt (which is also your debt) so there will be room for tax cuts during bad times.
What is happening now is fiscal mismanagement from a Conservative government who says they are fiscally responsible.
Matt
said
They should cut income and business taxes and raise the GST.
But the GST is unpopular, and people don't think about income tax cuts.
However the first step for a politician is to get elected, the GST cut is good politics.
More promises kept
said
Along with broad-based Income Tax cuts, these measures should go a long ways to help ALL Canadians.
Francis S
said
Peter
said
This does not make sense – I will have to spend money in order to realize this saving.
The tax break should have been on personal income tax.
stephen
said