Top Stories -   

1
Ontario flag

Ont. leaders carrying toxins in blood: study

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Toronto: All three Ontario leaders take the test
TO07_toxins

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (10)Add Comments Facebook   

Date: Fri. Sep. 7 2007 3:12 PM ET

Of the three main Ontario political leaders, Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory holds a slight edge in the number of toxic chemicals in his blood, says a study.

Here's how they ranked out of the 70 chemicals for which their blood was tested:

  • Tory: 44
  • Provincial NDP Leader Howard Hampton: 42
  • Ontario Premier and Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty: 41

"We chose these high-profile individuals to show that pollution isn't just something coming out of a tailpipe or a smokestack -- it's in all of us," Aaron Freeman, policy director for Environmental Defence, told CTV.ca on Friday.

"We are exposed to harmful chemicals on a daily basis, and not surprisingly, they're in our bodies."

There were 39 compounds common to all three leaders, said the study.

The three men all had higher pollution levels than an average family the group tested as part of the same study.

Here are the general types of chemicals found, some of which have multiple potential health effects:

  • Carcinogens: 33
  • Hormone disruptors: 24
  • Respiratory toxins: 9
  • Reproductive/developmental toxins: 39
  • Neurotoxins: 12
  • Chemicals with no health effects data: 2

"All three politicians tested were more polluted than the volunteers who participated in Environmental Defence's earlier study, Polluted Children, Toxic Nation: A Report on Pollution in Canadian Families, released in June 2006," the report said.

The concentration levels varied when compared to a similar study on four federal politicians that was released in January.

Environmental Defence said taken together, the reports show that people can be polluted with such chemicals no matter where they live or work.

With Ontario's provincial election set to kick off on Sept. 10, the organization urged action on an Ontario Pollution and Cancer Prevention Act to help protect human health.

Such legislation could help increase awareness of toxins and make funding available to allow companies, workers and citizens to reduce and ultimately eliminate the use of toxins, it said.

There are some things consumers can do to protect themselves against toxic chemicals, Freeman said.

"You can eat organic foods to reduce your exposure to pesticides. You can choose to use a metal water bottle instead of a hard, clear plastic one, which contains Bisphenol A," he said, referring to a chemical that the European Commission has classified as a reproductive toxin.

Governments must play a role in things like labelling, Freeman said.

"One in three infant formula cans contains Bisphenol A, and it leaches into the food; we know it gets absorbed by the baby," he said.

"We don't know which one in three contains Bisphenol A. We need government intervention to reduce exposure to toxic chemicals, not just coming out of smokestacks or tailpipes, but in consumer products."

With files from The Canadian Press

1

Add New Comment ( )

Bob
said
0 0

Would not di-hydrogen monoxide be water?


Bill
said
0 0

Politicians use environmentalism to promote themselves this is just tree huggers revenge and a very good idea at that.


Jonathan Abrams
said
0 0

Yes, I meant dihydrogen monoxide.

Here are some alarming facts: http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html


Gabriel
said
0 0

he meant di-hydrogen monoxide


Thomas Chan
said
0 0

Are these three leaders gonna get sick than others or the report is just for the sake of bringing up the environmental issues? We, human do carry cancerous cells too in different levels, some might even not have any problems in rest of their lives. So,....not to worry too much!


C
said
0 0

I think you mean carbon monoxide?

Health Canada establishes threshold levels to various chemicals that are acceptable in the average person, however some people are only affected by higher levels, while some suffer poor health with levels below health canada's standards. Many of these reports fail to explain to the general population the significance of these chemicals. The absence/presence of chemicals in any level is very often not a good sign, particularly when we're talking about hormone disruptors and carcinogens.


Jonathan Abrams
said
0 0

Everybody has trace chemicals in their body. Paranoid activists want us to believe that they're harmful, always. Chemicals are harmful, but only above certain levels. That is key.

This news article did not mention if the chemicals were at harmful levels.

Did they find hydrogen monoxide in their blood? It has been known to kills thousands of Canadians a year.


jude
said
0 0

It's probably too much to hope, but maybe Tory and McGuinty will look more favourably on a moratorium against uranium mining - which produces massive amounts of dangerous waste difficult to contain. What will it take for these politicians to insist studies be done on the effects of certain types of land use rather than allowing mining companies to overstep the EPA and other organizations created to protect the health and welfare of all Canadians?


marty d
said
0 0

Hopefully this might convince the Ontario government to change its stance on greenhouse they're so worried about the economy(the almighty dollar sign) but they don't get is without a planet how can their be an economy.

R.A. Evans
said
0 0

These silly reviews just show one more time how the so-called green movement have moved to the fringe. Why now try to be more constructive and evaluate the leaders on the basis of thier plans to protect the environment instead of some obscure reference to thier personal "carbon footprint"


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Most Talked about Stories

No easy answer to this mess! The goverments of many nations have been over borrowing for years. People have not been much better. The old rule of you cannot spent more then you make applies to both. This whole thing is going to be a long, painful and bumpy ride. Unfortunately, no one will learn their lesson when this is over and we will be in the same perdicament 50 years from now. Most of the lessons from the Great Depression were not learned.

coopns

OECD urges Canadian interest rate hike