Top Stories -   

1

Papers have conflicting visions of new pot law

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Papers report contradictory visions of new pot law
JW10_POT08

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | Print Facebook   

Date: Sun. May. 11 2003 8:11 AM ET

Ottawa is expected to table its new marijuana law next week, and in the roll up to its introduction there are wildly different views of what it might contain.

In separate reports Saturday, the Toronto Star and National Post newspapers both suggested Ottawa might be backing off on plans to decriminalize marijuana, in light of the potential for a backlash at U.S. border crossings.

According to the Toronto Star, anyone convicted of possessing "small amounts" of the drug would be fined -- not jailed -- and would not be left with a criminal record. Simple possession would remain on the books as a criminal offence under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

The Liberal government will propose tougher measures to target illegal marijuana growing operations, including the doubling of penalties for drug trafficking, sources told the paper.

It's a different story in the Globe and Mail, however. The paper reported Saturday that federal officials have settled on a 15-gram limit for personal possession. Anyone caught in possession of any quantity less than 15 grams would be ticketed and fined under the Contraventions Act.

Currently, anyone found with 30 grams or less can faces charges of common possession of the drug. Possession of more than that amount can mean prosecution for the intent to sell. Depending on how they are rolled, 15 grams of cannabis can produce about 20 joints.

The issue of decriminalization has already provoked a divisive debate. Many U.S. officials have expressed concerns about Canada's moves towards decriminalization, suggesting such a law would lead to interminable border delays. Some ministers have even argued in cabinet that the law would be another irritant in the relationship between Canada and the United States.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Most Talked about Stories

If there weren't so many people who hide their faces when committing violent acts then we wouldn't need a law forbidding masks. Unfortunately this is our society now. No one can hide their faces... we aren't special over here, violence has arrived and it is here to stay. Let's not kid ourselves. Violence just escalates to new levels. We've let this "hiding the faces" scenario go on far too long.

KC

Montreal bylaw could offer preview of federal mask ban