News Sections
Family speaks out as Montreal recovers from riot
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (107)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Aug. 11 2008 6:39 PM ET
The family of an 18-year-old shot dead by Montreal police say they are devastated by his loss, while residents recover from a neighbourhood protest that turned into a violent riot.
Freddy Villanueva was the youngest of five children. His family had moved to the Quebec city from Honduras.
"He was our little brother. He was the baby of the family," his sister Patricia told CTV Montreal on Monday.
Villanueva's brother was with him the night he died, following an apparent altercation with police. Dany Villanueva said officers had called him over and then held him to the ground, and his brother had told them to let him go.
Then he heard gunshots and his brother fell to the ground.
"I saw blood on his stomach and on his side and I couldn't do anything," he told CTV Montreal in French. "I kept saying, 'Take care of my brother, take care of my brother.'"
Villanueva was reportedly shooting dice with friends in Henri Bourassa Park in the ethnically-diverse borough when police attempted to make a routine arrest.
Montreal police say about 20 youths then surrounded them -- several of them reportedly rushing at police.
The Quebec provincial police have taken over the investigation.
Mayor Gerald Tremblay offered his condolences to the family and said it is vital that investigators get to the bottom of what took place Saturday evening in Montreal North.
"I share their pain and suffering in this very difficult time," Tremblay said during a news conference Monday.
"That is why it is essential to shed the light on every detail of this tragic event. I have personally asked the minister of public security Jacques Dupuis to identify the most effective way to ensure a transparent investigation can take place as quickly as possible. And I would like that investigation to be known and very well understood by the community."
Protest becomes violent
Villanueva's death triggered an angry and violent response Sunday night. Vehicles were set on fire and there was widespread looting and violence targeting police and emergency service workers.
One police officer was shot in the leg, while another officer and an ambulance technician received minor injuries. The technician was struck in the head with a bottle, said CTV Montreal's Maya Johnson.
"This morning Montreal's police chief Yvan Delormes appealed for calm in this city after such a tense night," Johnson told CTV's Canada AM.
"(There have been) six arrests so far and several counts of mischief -- up to 39 we're told, 20 break and enters and a lot of looting and vandalism happening last night," Johnson told CTV's Canada AM.
In addition, fire fighters who tried to extinguish burning cars were pelted with stones, three fire trucks were damaged and a fire station had to be evacuated after gasoline was apparently thrown into the station, Johnson said.
Bus shelters were also destroyed by the groups of angry youths.
"This is a group of people that are trying to say something to us and I am willing to listen," Delormes said at a Monday news conference.
Liberal MP Denis Coderre, who represents the riding that includes the ethnically diverse Montreal North, said the situation is tense, but key stakeholders are working towards a resolution.
"It is a very serious situation," Coderre said. "Of course there was some major vandalism but at the same time ... I spoke with many of the citizens and many of the authorities. Right now everybody is talking to each other, so I have a good feeling that we're on the right track."
With files from CTV Montreal
User Tools
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
If there weren't so many people who hide their faces when committing violent acts then we wouldn't need a law forbidding masks. Unfortunately this is our society now. No one can hide their faces... we aren't special over here, violence has arrived and it is here to stay. Let's not kid ourselves. Violence just escalates to new levels. We've let this "hiding the faces" scenario go on far too long.

Add New Comment ( )
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
0
said
0
We like to think that our world is just peachy but in reality it is not, if you have the intestinal fortitude to go out and see what a police officers deals with on a daily basis. I would think that you would be very impressed in the number of persons that lethal force could have been legally used but the officer was able to convince the aggressor to stop. As you know some people will never listen to reason….. I never had a police officer point a gun at me and I am 48 years old…..maybe it’s because I respect them and follow the law.
At the end of the day the police officer who took the right decision in using lethal force, will live with that decision for ever. Let’s give them a break,
Scott
0
said
0
mike
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
1 innocent civilian dead, 0 Police down
To serve and protect NOT to kill innocents.
You do the math!
Joel
0
said
0
JLD
0
said
0
But judging from the aftermath that included shootings and molotov cocktails some of these people surely weren't unarmed. And if the neaighbourhood is as bad as they say I'm sure the police police must have had some justification of peril with such a large group. But time will tell.
Bebe
0
said
0
right or wrong people express their grief in different ways
Devil's advocate
0
said
0
Edward in Vancouver
0
said
0
RJT
0
said
0
Furthermore I live in Montreal, this neighborhood is notoriously known for violence, drug related crime, and all kinds of horrible things. It is a ghetto, and the reason we have so many gang issues in this city. I have 2 friends who are police officers, who have told me there are apartment blocks in that neighborhood they will not go into without backup. Here is the reality of the situation, regardless of what the media wants to portray the police were arresting someone, even if they had no business arresting this individual, there is legal recourse for false arrest etc, we have a legal system for a reason. Apparently the group of individuals who decided to attempt to surround the officers don't have much respect for our legal system, and feel they can take the law into their own hands.
Whether or not the general public likes to accept it, police officers risk their lives daily, and they are already pretty high strung. Logic would constitute that surrounding, or intimidating the police in anyway shape or form is not a good idea. Its unfortunate a young man had to lose his life. But the reality of the situation is he was part of that crowd who felt they could take the law into their own hands, the officers felt threatened and addressed the situation accordingly. The other individuals who were in that group surrounding the officers, should get arrested and a minimum sentence of 10 years each just for trying to intimidate the officers.
Li
0
said
0
People are awfully fast to point the finger when a cop has to use force to ensure that law is maintained. Pretty soon, the police wont be allowed to defend itself and the agressors will have all the power. The behavior on Sunday is shameful. It solved nothing and put 6 ppl in jail, injured many, cost poor merchants a lot of money. At least before protesting let the authorities try to assest the issues. Geez.
David
0
said
0
I am not saying either side responded correctly, I just think mistakes were made on both sides and everyone needs to be better prepared for these kinds of situations so they don't go from a 'routine intervention' to a '18 year old man shot dead'.
What a sad situation.
I do not think it is fair to blame the police or the youth in this situation. I think the problem is mistrust between the two groups ( police and youth of the area ) has created an environment that could cause this kind of situation. BOTH groups need to work really hard in order to build a better relationship/understanding between them.
Canuck in WA State
0
said
0
1 - In canada I have far less fear of the police than I do of criminals. I fully support giving up some of my "rights" to protect societal rights.
2 - The use of a Taser should result in administrative leave and official review the same as the discharge of a firearm.
3 - People who have more than one arrest and court date outstanding should have to post cash or bond guaranteeing there appearance and behaviour for any further arrests. Each future arrest should requires another bond, and if the indivdual is found guilty on any of those arrests, than each and every bond should be forfeit, with a judge not able to override it.
Judges in Canada are too bloody lenient. We must balance individual rights with societal rights, and right now the individual has the edge.
Ian from N.B.
0
said
0
We don't know all the facts, if the police reports are correct and the men did surround them, then it would seem the police are well within they're right to act as they did. However should other reports say otherwise there will need to be serious questions here. A man is dead and it was from an officer, a man dedicated to maintaining law and order, so if new information states otherwise, there will need to be serious review.
As for everyone here stating that "kids these days have no respect", well excuse me, but I'm 19, well mannered and thoughtful of all people. To lump me in that crowd is just downright insulting. I've not lifted a hand against another person in anger, ever. I've never been insulting or mean to anyone for the purposes of pleasure. I'm always respectful of authority. People like PG, don't judge us all at once until you've actually taken the time to know us.
PeterL from Montreal
0
said
0
Do you think this 18-year old has the marking "UNARMED" engraved on his forehead? Gee....may be the police should take their time to read....or even better...get shot...then they know for sure the 18 year old is armed.
KH
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Does no one else see the inherent wrong in this? "good for you, for destroying the neighbourhood, because you don't like the cops." Might you explain this to those whose cars were burned, or whose houses or shops were vandalized and looted?
Ian
0
said
0
Let's cut the police some slack here as they probably have one of the most pressure filled jobs anywhere despite our thoughts about them hanging around at Tim Horton's.
GLENN C
0
said
0
S
0
said
0
Mark
0
said
0
The public has the right to know who is quoting the large numbers and who is quoting the small, and then form their own opinions of what that information means.
BW
0
said
0
"Police brutality is spreading across the country on the way they handle youth way of life"
What kind of an idiot comment was that?
How can you condemn the officer so quickly? Do the police not deserve due process?
As for your statement that it "seems to be happening more often now a days" have you ever considered that the reason may be that there more criminals out in society.
Probably not. In your mind its the police that are the problem not the criminals!!
Montreal Firefighter
0
said
0
But thats no big deal right? Police should have just turned a blind eye.
IT Manager from Edmonton
0
said
0
Respect for authority is not a cultrial thing, so when I hear squrmy wimpy Liberals say things like "stakeholders" or "willing to talk" I know the criminals are running the show. People who break laws need to stop breaking laws and society needs to be protected from them so the police have to do their jobs, end of story. People who don;t respect that need to learn to, as simple as that. I don't care how "disenfranchised" you feel.
Time for the police and politicians in Montreal to grow a spine and do their jobs take back the streets so people like me who do obey the law (and don't claim to be victims of something) don't have to hide indoors when this crap happens like I did during the hockey riots.
Bring on the Liberal wimps who will tell me I am a neo con hate monger (probably racist also) only becuase I think this is a simple equation for the police to do their jobs and the politicians to allow them to. Clearly I'm too stupid to understand the nuiances of the cultural situation on the ground right? Give me a break!
Kevin
0
said
0
Amm
0
said
0
Do you know every household and their parenting skill in that neighbourhood? I'll money on this, the officers involed were new to the force and unexperienced...like most cases we have been seeing this past year.
Chris
0
said
0
Donald
0
said
0
Point being, 20 youth rush a police officer. Did some of you miss that? What kind of youths or kids rush and swarm a police officer? What were they going to do to that officer? Hence the use of lethal force.
Thank you to all police who go to work all day everyday, listen to the feedback of wallflowers and still come to our aid!
montrealer
0
said
0
FreakAlert
0
said
0
The egos of a couple officers placed the whole social, pecking order at risk. Some will be fired forsure.
~David #1~
0
said
0
I'm siding with the police on this issue because I know exactly what they're dealing with. As far as I'm concerned the police should also arrest their parents who can't seem to control the little punks they've let loose on our society. Make "no" mistake..those brats are no angels.
John
0
said
0
Catherine
0
said
0
Stephanie
0
said
0
Andy
0
said
0
Let's start bringing back standards for height and weight for the police. People under a certain height and weight should find something else to for a living instead of law enforcement.
Kurt Peats
0
said
0
Armchair policeman/lawyers/Clairvoyants appear the following day with all of the supposedly correct answers. Of course all of their postualtions are void of any facts and are based upon their feelings.
The one thing I do know is that if you want the police to back away from anythng that might seem confrontational, then you have just trained all bad guys to be very aggressive and then the police will simply turn tail and run. This is not a society that I want to live in.
I am thankful that we have men and women willing to answer the cll of duty and patrol in the middle on the night. Otherwise our society would deterioate into chaos.
May God bless the men and women in uniform. I vote for them.
Kurt
mario
0
said
0
i myself have been in a park around midnight and questioned by police (they close at 11 by city bylaws). a buddy and me were having a cigarette, the cops showed up 10 minutes later we got there. we didn't realize that the park was next to a synogue (this was a week after the jewish elementary school was fire bombed in montreal many years ago) they came with a moderetly aggresive tone and questioned us. we were confused with the confrontational tone, but once they explained the situation, checked our ID and asked us to leave nothing happened!! WE ARE BOTH FROM AN ETHIC MINORITY, BOTH VISABLE!!! there was no police brutality, no abuse, nothing. they were on edge and suspicious, BUT THAT IS THERE JOB!!! To protect the community. We left and respected the law and nothing happened, no arrests, no abuse. RESPECT IS A TWO WAY STREET!!!!
If police are aggressive in that area it is because they aren't given any respect. I am fed up with minority groups coming out and taking advantage of these situations and blaming the police. They constantly argue that police should reach out to the community, how about the community makes them feel at home, like they have a sense of authority.
Laws are what seperate civilized societies from the wild, once we lose respect for laws we are no better than wild animals. I am not saying it is perfect, but it's much better than living in a jungle.
Tammy
0
said
0
Jeff
0
said
0
The same kind of thing has been happening in the States in black inner city communities for decades, and the cause is not "lack of morals", but the consequence of oppression and poverty. In fact, blaming people for their own victimization is an indication of ethical immaturity, and betrays a deep lack of compassion. Would any of our conservative posters here care to blame First Nations people for their misery? How about black inner city Americans? I didn't think so.
Maybe we should be asking why we have enclaves of poor youth in our inner cities, and whether this violence isn't a sign of more pressing problems in our social fabric. That might be more rational- and humane- than automatically blaming a dead child.
PATTI
0
said
0
On the subject of the shooting, my reality is quite different from the kids in the park. I have sympathy for the loss of a young person and the devastating effect it has on his parents and friends.
I think it will finally be ruled as an accident, which I have to believe at this stage, it was.
Lee
0
said
0
bob
0
said
0
Today there is no disipline from anyone.
Even the law now says that you cannot disipline your kids.
Until something is done to address this shortcoming nothing will get better, only worse.
Phil G
0
said
0
People should take time to read the article before reaction only on the riot.
Allot of young cops act like school yard bullies and they decided to dispurse a group of friends with police brutality.
The use of firearms should never be used against an unarmed individual, especially one without a record who just wanted to protect his older brother who was innocent.
He was unarmed, you never use lethal force on unarmed assailants.
I do not condone the riots. Violence is wrong, but my heart goes out to his mother and family who lost a son because some young jacked bully decided to pick trouble against innocent youngsters.
Todd
0
said
0
When we lose respect for authority society cannot exist anymore. It's the same problems in our schools...too many entitled youths who believe they shouldn't have to do things that they don't want to do. It all starts at home!
TheAlchemist
0
said
0
Leigh
0
said
0
Brian
0
said
0
A young man has died and that is tragically sad, and although we don’t know all of the facts, it appears that he died as a consequence of his actions. Unfortunately things won’t get better until individuals learn that they are accountable for their behavior and that there will be consequences.
People... teach your children about accountability, then teach them that we ALL have rights.
PG
0
said
0
Michelle O
0
said
0
Laura
0
said
0
Naji
0
said
0
cat
0
said
0
Darren
0
said
0
jay kay
0
said
0
I also believe that there are individuals in the police force who are only too ready and willing to exert a disproportionate amount of force whenever the opportunity avails itself to them (Vancouver tasing incident, for example), and they, too, should be held to account for their wrongdoing. However, when an officer of the law genuinely feels that he/she is being seriously threatened, then I fully support whatever amount of force they deem necessary to protect themselves. Don't forget, anyone willing to exhibit a menacing attitude toward the police, will have no problems doing likewise to an average citizen, so I would rather the potential threat to others was nipped in the bud before an innocent person gets hurt.
And as for those hooligans who think the appropriate response to a perceived wrong is to terrorize a neighbourhood, trash private and public property and place innocent bystanders at serious risk of harm or even death, I say the police should swarm in and pummel these malevolent cretins with whatever amount of force is necessary. This kind of mindless destruction to a community is a bane to society and a message needs to be sent that it will not be tolerated for any reason.
Earl Robert
0
said
0
Peter
0
said
0
ryan j veli
0
said
0
1- We all believe in Truth and Justice right?
2- We believe that a police officer would be justified in shooting morons that surround and threaten them if there was in fact a real or even percieved threat right?
3- Citizens have a right to due process and not to be shot at unjustly right?
Now that all being said not one of us knows what really happened. Lets allow the investigations to continue and the powers that be to do thier job. As a footnote I am an ex military police officer but I also have concerns about the lack of training and proffesionalism in the MUC Police. The SQ however in my experience is very well trained and proffesional. Lets hope somewhere inbetween both Truth and Justice prevail.
Understand before you judge
0
said
0
How you can be treated as a criminal for just sitting in a park with a few friends minding your own. The police in these areas sometimes act as they have the right to bother and harass you. When friends and family are arrested for just being in the wrong place having done nothing wrong. Only to be released a day later without a simple apology. Live a day in different shoes, and wait till the facts are heard before judging these young people. It can give you a feeling of helplessness when the police don't even show you respect as a person due to living in a high crime area.
Michael
0
said
0
Evan in Athabasca
0
said
0
Sad that the youths think they have rights to break the law and bring violence into the play, this goes to show the youth have no disregard for life, the police officers have a right to protect themselves if they are threatened. People feel this is a police state or feel threatened by the police should look at their own actions....
Chris
0
said
0
If police are telling you to stand down/stay where you are/whatever, and you keep advancing, what do you think is going to happen? Police are going to ask nicely?
To Ian:
I have travelled across Canada, and I don't remember the last time Toronto or Vancouver rioted. MOntreal riots at the drop of a hat. The Habs win a playoff series, they riot. They lost a playoff series, they riot. It rains when it's supposed to be sunny, they riot.
I stand by my claim that Montreal is a disgrace based on the rioting fact, and no other city riots as easily as they do.
Fil
0
said
0
Will
0
said
0
Montrealer in Calgary
0
said
0
Sherry
0
said
0
M. Cameron
0
said
0
Tony
0
said
0
Brad
0
said
0
Luna
0
said
0
Reading the maniacal, non-sensical language and insane conclusions being voiced by Mike Webster, Chris and the highly evolved Mickey, I am no longer shocked that our world is spiraling towards global religious warfar and gossip/inuendo passing as real journalism. We have only slightly more than a few shreds of information about this disturbing incident but, the conservative elements have all the evidence they need & have made up their minds long before the full disclosure of facts and they've decided that killing a child, a young Canadian who in a couple of years could've whipped his life into shape and become the next prime minister but, now is dead. Killed by a police officer, which is very disturbing to me and I expect the incident to be fully investigated.
Believe it or not folks, young people are very angry and it's starting to show up in our schools, institutions and streets. Do we want to become a nation that kills people for nothing?
Lets wait and see for collection of information before we make vile snap judgements like 'we reap what we sow'.
Paula
0
said
0
jr
0
said
0
Edb
0
said
0
When a group of wanna-be gangstas come after you or kick-in your front door, you better be sure not to insult or injure them, the human rights groups are watching!
ps. to all the legal firearms owners, hang on to 'em, seems the police are no longer allowed to defend themselves....let alone the rest of us.
joey
0
said
0
Call this what it is, quit white washing issues like this to make the police look like the bad guys every time an officer does his duty.
These are CRIMINAL GANGS.Not innocent kids. Drive through that neigborhood and see for yourself.
Wake up people
ann
0
said
0
Nicholas
0
said
0
I do not want to comment on if the police were right or wrong. However, the police where there to do a job and the response was about 20 ppl coming out and threatening them. This shows a huge amount of disrespect to law and authority. This seems to be very indicative of the youth NOT only in Montreal but across North America. I will admit that it gets plastered across the news in Canada about the lawlessness in Montreal - it maybe justified however, its not just a Montreal thing.
Youth are being brought up without guidance and respect for others. This has been happening for quite awhile now. Just look at all the shootings and killings in Toronto. Something needs to be done in order to get our future generations a better foundation to stand on.
There is definitely a swing in youths attitude to the value or life, law and respect for others. I don't really know where it originates but I feel that it must start at the family level. Where people who have to work hard sacrifice their time with their childern in order to make ends meet are leaving their childern unsupervised and at large. Their for leaving childern and teens unsupervised and the law to deal with them.
I have have seen the unfortunate results of this as I have been a friend to someone whos own child was shot and killed while out at night at a time he should not have ever been allowed to be out at for his age.
Society will reap what it spawns for good or for worse. We need to wake up to the fact that our societies in Canada need fixing and care. We should be spending our money on Youth and not for things such as bidding for the Olympics for example.
Ian
0
said
0
All the brilliant police training in the world would not have change a thing. You're surrounded by thugs that disrespect authority and you get a gut feeling that something's going wrong and your life is on the line.
I don't know and don't care if the arrest was justified-- that's why we have courts. If he was arrested for a good reason, he will go to jail and justice will prevail. If he was arrested for no good reason, he will be free, and justice will prevail. If police used poor judgement in making the arrest, they will get punished and the city or province will pay $10,000,000 to apologize. There was no reason for "kids" (18 and over aren't kids), to corner the police. Be reasonable people-- you'd do the same thing as those police officers on that night.
trueman
0
said
0
It seems the only group of people trying to take a stand for what is right these days are the police. They are the only ones fighting for order. We have decided, as a country, that our children have sooo many rights and that you are not to touch them. The schools have their hands tied. The teachers are the ones getting hit and assaulted by the children. Then, the next day, that child is back in class like nothing ever happened. As a parent, if you were to touch them, tisk tisk tisk. This is ridiculous. I got the hammer fist from my father maybe 10 times growing up. I never got arrested, I never fought the police, I never assault fire fighters or paramedics.
I am not trying to label the kids of Montreal but I have never heard of Fire Fighters getting assaulted at a scene except for in Montreal.
Steve formerly of Mtl
0
said
0
St. Jean Baptiste, hockey events, etc., any reason to create havoc. People throw up their arms and put up with it, no-one getting injured.
But add modern group hooliganism to the mix, and you have real trouble.
If a group of people charged the cops, well, that is a line you cannot cross.
Zak
0
said
0
Adam in Ottawa
0
said
0
Ian
0
said
0
I guess Andy's comment about Montrealers not knowing how to behave is deserved-- quite a few riots in Montreal. So what's the deal? What do we do about that? Maybe a crackdown on people who defy authority? Like those 20 youths. I'm not happy that someone died, but maybe that'll send a signal that when you play with fire, you may get burned. A lesson today's generation hasn't learned yet.
Roger T. Your comment is offbase. Yes police serve and protect, but guess what, they aren't asked to lay their lives on the line to save that of a hoodlum. When it comes down to them or the other guy, they will revert to self-defence. Exactly what happened here. I pity the poor police officer who will no doubt be led to believe she was in error.
Tom
0
said
0
The YCJA emphasizes a reduction in the use of the formal court system and custody, and focuses on community-based responses to youth crime. This has resulted in a decline of youths in custody and the closures of youth facilities across the country. These stats serve the government well, despite that fact that youth crime is not only on the increase and but increasing violent.
Offenses that would have typically resulted in incarceration under the much harsher YOA, now results in curfews.
During its time, the YOA was hotly criticized for being too soft on youth crime. Yet, in 2003, it was replaced with the much softer YCJA, but for some strange reason, the debate went away.
YCJA has produced a generation of young criminals that have never experienced real consequences for their actions, and now lack respect for the law.
Matty
0
said
0
Georges
0
said
0
The riots are entirely justified. The police in Canada are a disgrace
jules
0
said
0
To Joe; the kid was playing 'marbles' with his friends when the cops arrested him! He was not a troublemaker and his dad was a professional electrician - the boy was smart and shy and wanted to follow in his dad's footsteps as a professional. Get the full story before you judge who these kids are; these kids were not the rioters- one hopes the media keeps the riots seperate from why this kid was gunned down by one cop who was reckless in in the shooting - I mean no weapons were drawn on the police nor were there sudden life threatening movements by the group... where was a warning shot fired at least in this non 'critically-dangerous' situation?
Big M
0
said
0
Jackie
0
said
0
does this not sound familiar, this exact same senario happened in the US, child dead neighborhood develops a mistrust for authority and far away people instantly assume the childeren have "no respect for authority" this is a trap, an old trap used to create a chasm in a culture, dont fall for it- the officers involved in the original incident who SHOT an unarmed child need to be fired- if this was your child and your neighborhood and you saw how the yes-men immediately blamed you, how would you feel- conflict creation /sigh
mario
0
said
0
Have you ever been in this neighborhood???
I have friends who used to live there, but moved in the last 10 years because these streets are controlled by gangs!! What about the human rights of the citizens who can't walk their dogs at night or go for a walk without seeing an armed 16 year old selling drugs in a parks.
If the 18 year old was an innocent bystander, there wouldn't of been riots and tension. He belonged to a group, that is fact and they are upset that police defended themselves. The only reason that kid was in the park so late, was for drugs, selling buying or doing them, whatever.
Don't judge from a distance, go to the neighborhood live there for a week and then talk to me about human rights. IF ANYTHING THE COPS ARE TOO SOFT IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD and the riots last night show the lack of control they have.
If the authorities are going to try to reclaim complete control, get ready for more violence. These people will shoot at police without thinking twice, it's a jungle there. Crack and pot growing houses are common in this neighborhood. What about the rights of the citizens to live in peace????
I watched it all on the french news that carried live feeds. At one point the police were shot at, people were walking around cars driving, they have no control over this area. Only the military would of been able to set up a perimeter, they still have no control and won't get it back. It will be interesting to see what happens in the next days or weeks.
Lee
0
said
0
jules
0
said
0
What you need to realise is this is a situation where you don't simply take sides because you like cops in general or dislike them. Look at the facts. One cop screwed up very badly and is the cause of this entire mess and tragedy. Giving that cop a free pass is an insult to the rest of well-behaved cops in the city and also to the youngster's parents who want proper justice now and not a police cover-up nor the media sidetracking to focus on 'gang-violence/riots' instead of devoting themselves to why a cop fired in a situation police never fire their guns.
Chris
0
said
0
1. Respect them, Chances are the individual police officer has done nothing to wrong you personally. So don't take it out on them.
2. Don't be aggressive. Especially if they have their sidearm out!
Police don't just walk up to a situation and start shooting. Or deploy a taser. If you don't give a police officer a reason to hurt you then they won't. Police Brutality comes when they hurt you without a reason. Rushing a police officer, reaching into your pocket, when you outnumber them, refusing to drop a knife when told to do so are all reasons to get hurt. It's common sense people not police brutality.
My father has a heart condition. Getting hit with a taser would probably kill him. He knows this, therefore if a police officer gets ready to deploy his taser my dad will comply. Confrontations aren't the place to challenge the police. If you must their is a legal and complaints system to do this. Chances are if you challenge them directly 10/10 times you will loose.
kellie
0
said
0
Mike Webster
0
said
0
Akira M.
0
said
0
WMN
0
said
0
John in Montreal
0
said
0
Mtler
0
said
0
Shoe
0
said
0
Obviously those youths have no respect for the officers involved. Chances are, the one who got killed, was a big culprit in this. (Sad for his family however).
The youth these days have no respect for anything, and believe that they are entitled to everything. If the youtbh surrounded the police, then they have to understand the end result, as police have to protect themselves! If killing someone is the result, then so be it. As for the looters, etc... Slammer time for a long time!
FreakAlert2008
0
said
0
Curious, though, what exactly does, "routine intervention", actually mean? Makes me ask the question, what authority does a police officer have over another man when no law has is broken? Being born as equal men and women..I would say, none. Though, servitude is voluntary, however, ignorant we all are of it and the laws many of us are so ignorant of.
Gary Menten
0
said
0
As far as I can tell from what little details have been reported, the original incident that prompted the riot is a situation that quickly spiralled out of control. There are several questions that need be answered here that and the press would do well to start asking them.
1. What is implied by a routine arrest? What was the reason for the police making the arrest that provoked the incident? Was a crive actually committed, or was this a case of "round up the usual suspects?"
2. How many officers were involved in the original incident? If they were badly outnumbered, why did they not call for backup before proceeding with the arrest?
Please follow up on this.
j
0
said
0
FREEDOM!!!!!!! no more
Andy in Cambridge
0
said
0
Chris
0
said
0
And as for the looting and crap...it IS Montreal, so is anyone really surprised? As far as big cities go in Canada, Montreal is a disgrace.
Roger T
0
said
0
Seems to be happening more often now a days!
joe
0
said
0
Mickey
0
said
0
Sean
0
said
0