Top Stories -   

1

Chemicals feminizing male wildlife, study warns

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (32) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Dec. 9, 2008 4:03 PM ET

Chemicals used in common household products that leach into the environment are having a feminizing effect on male wildlife, warns a new study, which suggests potential harm to human males as well.

The report found that chemicals such as pesticides and phthalates block the male hormone androgen, which results in changes to male sex organs.

Phthalates are used in a number of plastic products, such as shower curtains, to make them more flexible.

The findings were released Sunday by CHEM Trust, an organization devoted to researching the effects of chemicals on both humans and animals.

The effects of anti-androgen chemicals include:

  • un-descended, small or abnormal testicles
  • small penises
  • ambiguous genitals

The effects are seen across a wide array of wildlife, from otters and seals in the United Kingdom to polar bears in the Arctic to eland antelopes in Africa, the report said.

As well, in egg-laying species, including fish, amphibians, birds and reptiles, males exposed to sex hormone-disrupting chemicals are producing an egg yolk protein normally made by females.

Affected species include flounder in U.K. estuaries, cod in the North Sea, cane toads in Florida, peregrine falcons in Spain and turtles in the Great Lakes.

These changes to male reproductive organs could decimate animal populations if factors such as fertility and sex drive are affected. Indeed, seal populations in the North Sea off eastern England have decreased so much that scientists there will soon begin investigating changes to the animals' reproductive health, according to the report.

"Urgent action is needed to control gender bending chemicals, and more resources are needed for monitoring wildlife," report author Gwynne Lyons said in a statement. "Man-made chemicals are clearly damaging the basic male tool-kit. If wildlife populations crash, it will be too late. Unless enough males contribute to the next generation, there is a real threat to animal populations in the long term."

Vertebrate animals have similar sex-hormone receptors, the report said.

"Therefore, observations in one vertebrate wildlife species, may serve to highlight pollution issues of concern for other vertebrates, including humans," the report said. "Indeed, given the widespread presence of endocrine (hormone) disrupting chemicals in the environment, effects are likely to be occurring in more species than those currently reported."

The report underscores growing concerns among scientists and the general public over the potential health effects caused by the chemical bisphenol A (BPA).

Numerous animal studies have shown that BPA mimics the effects of the hormone estrogen in the body. The chemical, found in a number of household products from plastic food containers and aluminum food cans to electronic equipment, is linked to health problems that range from reproductive difficulties to cancer and heart disease.

The findings have led the Canadian government to declare BPA a dangerous a substance and ban it from the manufacture of baby bottles.

The report also adds to growing research that shows babies born to mothers who are exposed to phthalates while pregnant are born with genital defects that include having a urinary tract separate from the penis and small or un-descended testicles.

Comments are now closed for this story

Vaino Lund
said

First we must get over the idea that anything is 'foretold' such as a rapture or an end times, or any other doomsday. Then we need to sit down like the many facets of a finely cut diamond and as the whole of humanity think about our future. What is important to us as individuals? a third plasma screen for the bathroom, or maybe a substantial reduction in the plastic continent floating in the middle of the pacific ocean? You can drive to the corner store to rent a great action thriller video, or you can walk down and rent An Inconvenient Truth; then screen it for your family and friends, then make carpool arrangements, at the very least. But most importantly, we must stop praying for an answer, and simply answer the problem.


fireflicker
said

Would we be so bad off without males? Afterall; they are the ones who normally start wars and fight for "supremacy".


Adam
said

Yes, it's more likely the horomone effluent from birth control pharmeceuticals being excreted into the water. This is a not-well-published environmental poison. However, can't be ignored for much longer!


North of 60
said

No wonder it is so hard to get men to help with the housecleaning.


Adam Baum
said

What about the massive amounts of birth contol pills that ultimately end up in our drinking water? Since that is actual female hormones as opposed to hormone like synthetics. I'm surprised they didn't mention that, it was in a similar article I read yesterday.


Estrogen
said

I'd read that estrogen found in birth control pills also adds to the feminization of male wildlife.


Dale - Edmonton
said

Evidence mounts that a chemical is bad for you. Industry resists despite the growing evidence and the availability of cost effective alternatives...this is an all too familiar story. Corporate responsbility is preached by many, practiced by few.


Ke
said

I with issues of chemical/hormonal contamination would make as big a headline as global warming has. All our pharmaceuticals, pestesides, household cleaners, vehicle wastes, factory chemicals, hormones/antibiotics in meat/fish, etc are leaching into our environment and out bodies. Its such a shame what we are doing to ourselves and our panet. One example, think of how many litres of windshield washer fluid run into our water supply every day. We are now getting warnings that we should 'limit' our comsumption of certain types of fish due to mercury contamination. How long until these same warnings are sent out about other food supplies? Our food/water supply is our lifeline! Our water treatment plants do not take out all the chemicals. To me, if the chemical is not save enough to eat/drink straight from the bottle, its not safe enough to get washed into the environment for us to consume indirectly day after day. I read an article about Canadians and we have 20-40+ dangerous chemicals in our bodies all across the country. So scary. This is just building up in the earth day after day after day. We are to blame and we have to be the solution.


James
said

We as people need to leave the least amount of human footprint on the environment as possible. Homes that integrate with the environment and good use of technology will reduce energy consumption. People in rural and urban areas should grow gardens for food. The least amount of harmful chemicals the better! We NEED to respect nature in all its beauty and be thankful for what we have and share with others. The world is a small place afterall.


Ron in Ontario
said

George Carlin said it in a nut shell. He hates people that say save the trees, save the bees, save the snales, save the whales, save the planet. The planet has been here for over 4 billion years and we as a species may have been here for 200,000 years. The plant is not going anywhere. WE ARE. It will shake us off like a bad case of flees.

Once we are gone, the planet will heal and recover and the whole process will start all over again. Folks, there is nothing we can do to stop it. Greed and more Greed is driving us to our own distruction.


Chicken Little
said

We are all doomed, run and hide for the sky will surly fall. It seems that every second day some obscure scientist somewhere comes up with some kind of doom story. I presume the purpose is to frighten the masses to such a degree that everyone will just creep to some corner and quiver themselves to death, then nature will be all better. What a zoo.


not so naive
said

let's not be so naive as to think that chemicals in the environment will stay near their point of origin. That may be true for the first short period of time that the chemical enters the global environment, but over time the global nature of our environment becomes evident. Lets not forget that all of us in NA experienced nuclear rains after chernobyl, the soot of Mt. St. Hellens rained down around the whole world. The toxins released in the air in Nickle country made it across to the east coast, the deforestation of NA arboreal forest, and SA Amazon forest have played their roles in the de-oxegenation of the planet, yet these two giant forests are small in comparison to the world as a whole.
The point is that toxins travel, and since we've had flexible shower curtains in NA for the whole of my life, I would say that these chemicals have had a good long amount of time to travel the world over, to leach into the water supply, to work into the stratosphere, infect the water vapours that circle the globe, poision the oceans -- which subsequently have been used as many Major Cities' trash bins for many years. We cannot apply simplistic understandings to the environment because the environment is far too complex for basic models. We do not have a good enough understanding of our environment to make such simplsitic analogies as assuming that the since Artic dwellers don't have need for many of these chemicals, and might themselves have a 0 impact, that they are not affected.
At the end of the day, we all know better than to let man made toxins into the environment, yet we don't do anything about it.


Ryan Dicker - Renfrew, ON
said

If you can't believe based on the facts presented in this news article (which is simply an overview of the press release made by CHEM Trust) then look up CHEM Trust and click on publications and open up the full 48 page report. There is much more detailed information on the studies findings there.


Alistair McLaughlin
said

Un-descended, small or abnormal testicles, small penises, and ambiguous genitals? You mean.... something's wrong with me?



Peter
said

I forget the name, but there was a study done on this about a reserve I think near Sarnia or some other industrial city in Ontario, where there was a much higher proportion of female children than male children, and the researchers theorized that it was due to the influence of chemicals from nearby factories.


Karen
said

I recommend "not convinced" to watch the "The disappearing male"
You might have a whole new take on it after that


goldylocks
said

It makes me sick to think that even small amounts of chemicals of any kind are allowed to be used at all. It's nice that they took the baby bottles with BPA off the shelves but what about everything else that contains it. These chemcials being leached into the environment by us and the things we use daily is scary but I find it funny how they are worries that it "could" affect humans...what? You don't think it isn't already? Look at the infertility rates and the increase of cancers, etc. Put two and two together people!!

So many people are so oblivious to all the chemicals being used in their everyday products, foods, etc., that or they just choose to stick their head in the sand.

I guess once again it comes down to the almighty dollar and people making money rather than peoples' health.

The world is not ours:
we borrow it from our children.


Gerald from Belleville
said

Not convinced: Never heard of prevailing winds, ocean currents, dumping, migration, and others have we? Perhaps didn't take the basic chemistry or ecology course in high school?


Jo
said

What timing! A friend and his son shot a buck during this past hunting season but when they approached the fallen deer they discovered that although this deer had a 4 point antler rack - there was no male genitals present! They contacted local wildlife conservationalists and were told there is a 1 in 500,000 occurance of this happening -supposedly a female with antlers. I am thinking that this is a pretty good indication that the article is accurate. Now what do they do on "Buck Night?"


enviro scientist
said

for the "not convinced" reader... just another example of the ignorance most people have with regards to the biogeochemical processes on earth... the planet is complex and the actions or pollutants that occur in one area are absolutely not isolated to that origin. Polluants easily disperse around the world even just through the water cycle. animals with higher amounts of fat cumulate insoluble toxins in their tissue. these studies are based on good science and as humans we should be concerned for all biodiversity including ourselves.


Lynn S from Ontario
said

This news is very disturbing. If it follows that human males are already being adversely affected, then our governments must act now to ensure the propagation of our species. We may not be able to undo the chemical harm in time to affect this end. It may be prudent to find an alternate method of reproduction in the interim, while simultaneously working to remove the harmful chemicals that alter the reproductive process. Canada has many excellent biological scientists. Let's put them to work.


Jay from NB
said

"Gender bending chemicals...suggests potential harm to human males as well."

Did everyone truly read between the lines??...


Kevin
said

This is not new news. Canadain goverment had the same results in the mid eighty's in regards to great lakes. But the researchers were gagged by goverment order. How do I know this. The researcher was my brother. Industries come first over the common Joe.


AirController
said

1. To James - what?

2. To Not Convinced - It demonstrates that everything that goes into the environment is dispersed widely, and that includes toxins from burning and factories as well. By stating that you're "not convinced" are you implying there is a natural explanation for these effects?


Hal
said

We live in a tiny community in rural Nova Scotia, at the end of a country road. In 1995, a deer was discovered to have fallen into a shallow abandoned well. Personnel from Natural Resources were called and neighbours came to help with the rescue. The deer was tranquilized and hauled from the well. In removing the harness and checking "her" over to be sure the deer was not injured, it was discovered that "she" was a male. Though full sized, there wasn't even the hint of antler buds or secondary male characteristics.

At the time, one of the men from Natural Resources commented that androgenous deer were quite common in our area.

Since we're a fair distance from any sizeable human population, I suspect hormone disrupter chemicals have already reached epidemic proportions in our environment!

And Rachel, "future generations ..."? That's optimistic!


Not convinced
said

Obviously this study is flawed. If they are blaming common household products, pesticides and shower curtains, why is it affecting polar bears at the north pole and antellope in Africa? They use soooo many household products to clean their huts and igloos there as opposed to say Europe or North America. (not to mention all of the shower curtain manufacturing plants in the Arctic!) If this is the case then we should see considerably more feminizing of all animals in all developed and overpopulated areas. Especially if this is attributed to leaching from the environment. Wouldnt higher concentrations of chemicals be in the areas where these products are used more, and hence shouldnt there be greater effect in the animal populations there? Where are the increased numbers for these areas?


kate
said

I took an environmental science course several years ago. In one case we studied an experiment where rats were exposed to BPA's and the result was that the male rats were more docile, had issues with their private parts not developing properly and interestingly the female rats become more aggressive. In other cases female specimens were detected to be developing male private parts - which were up inside of them as the article states. I took this course over 7 years ago and this is how long it's taken for it to trickle down to the media??? We also discussed the correlation with the ever growing infertility rates being seen in the Western world now. Coincidence, I think not!


James
said

Call in Dr> Ruth Westheimer. She will know what to do to improve the animal male in many species and make that particular animal species feel like a strong male. I dislike the decline in animal species and males should be encouraged to be masculine and reproduce! Dr. Ruth helps humans with sexual problems, maybe she could help the animal kingdom. The more animals we have on earth the more food availability. The food chain starts with grass and seeds and a strong foundation at the bottom is a good situation.


TVic
said

I find it interesting and disappointing that government scientists are no longer publishing such work. Thanks to the likes of Bush and Harper gov't scientists are being muzzled and nothing comes out of the gov't unless it can be spun as 'good news'.



Johnson Mapple
said

This is a terrible price to pay for something as inconsequential as a flexible shower curtain.


Rachel
said

The irreversible contamination of the planet with under-tested, overused and indestructible poisons will be one of the dark legacies of this age. Future generations will wonder what we were thinking.


Dave T
said

It would be naive to beleive that it isn't possible that this is happening to humans and other animals as well. We all live in the same world.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Most Talked about Stories

If there weren't so many people who hide their faces when committing violent acts then we wouldn't need a law forbidding masks. Unfortunately this is our society now. No one can hide their faces... we aren't special over here, violence has arrived and it is here to stay. Let's not kid ourselves. Violence just escalates to new levels. We've let this "hiding the faces" scenario go on far too long.

KC

Montreal bylaw could offer preview of federal mask ban