News Sections
Chemicals feminizing male wildlife, study warns
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tuesday Dec. 9, 2008 4:03 PM ET
Chemicals used in common household products that leach into the environment are having a feminizing effect on male wildlife, warns a new study, which suggests potential harm to human males as well.
The report found that chemicals such as pesticides and phthalates block the male hormone androgen, which results in changes to male sex organs.
Phthalates are used in a number of plastic products, such as shower curtains, to make them more flexible.
The findings were released Sunday by CHEM Trust, an organization devoted to researching the effects of chemicals on both humans and animals.
The effects of anti-androgen chemicals include:
- un-descended, small or abnormal testicles
- small penises
- ambiguous genitals
The effects are seen across a wide array of wildlife, from otters and seals in the United Kingdom to polar bears in the Arctic to eland antelopes in Africa, the report said.
As well, in egg-laying species, including fish, amphibians, birds and reptiles, males exposed to sex hormone-disrupting chemicals are producing an egg yolk protein normally made by females.
Affected species include flounder in U.K. estuaries, cod in the North Sea, cane toads in Florida, peregrine falcons in Spain and turtles in the Great Lakes.
These changes to male reproductive organs could decimate animal populations if factors such as fertility and sex drive are affected. Indeed, seal populations in the North Sea off eastern England have decreased so much that scientists there will soon begin investigating changes to the animals' reproductive health, according to the report.
"Urgent action is needed to control gender bending chemicals, and more resources are needed for monitoring wildlife," report author Gwynne Lyons said in a statement. "Man-made chemicals are clearly damaging the basic male tool-kit. If wildlife populations crash, it will be too late. Unless enough males contribute to the next generation, there is a real threat to animal populations in the long term."
Vertebrate animals have similar sex-hormone receptors, the report said.
"Therefore, observations in one vertebrate wildlife species, may serve to highlight pollution issues of concern for other vertebrates, including humans," the report said. "Indeed, given the widespread presence of endocrine (hormone) disrupting chemicals in the environment, effects are likely to be occurring in more species than those currently reported."
The report underscores growing concerns among scientists and the general public over the potential health effects caused by the chemical bisphenol A (BPA).
Numerous animal studies have shown that BPA mimics the effects of the hormone estrogen in the body. The chemical, found in a number of household products from plastic food containers and aluminum food cans to electronic equipment, is linked to health problems that range from reproductive difficulties to cancer and heart disease.
The findings have led the Canadian government to declare BPA a dangerous a substance and ban it from the manufacture of baby bottles.
The report also adds to growing research that shows babies born to mothers who are exposed to phthalates while pregnant are born with genital defects that include having a urinary tract separate from the penis and small or un-descended testicles.
User Tools
Related Stories
Subscribe!
CTV.ca Blogs
Like us on Facebook
Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews
Related Websites
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
If there weren't so many people who hide their faces when committing violent acts then we wouldn't need a law forbidding masks. Unfortunately this is our society now. No one can hide their faces... we aren't special over here, violence has arrived and it is here to stay. Let's not kid ourselves. Violence just escalates to new levels. We've let this "hiding the faces" scenario go on far too long.
Email


Comments are now closed for this story
Vaino Lund
said
fireflicker
said
Adam
said
North of 60
said
Adam Baum
said
Estrogen
said
Dale - Edmonton
said
Ke
said
James
said
Ron in Ontario
said
Once we are gone, the planet will heal and recover and the whole process will start all over again. Folks, there is nothing we can do to stop it. Greed and more Greed is driving us to our own distruction.
Chicken Little
said
not so naive
said
The point is that toxins travel, and since we've had flexible shower curtains in NA for the whole of my life, I would say that these chemicals have had a good long amount of time to travel the world over, to leach into the water supply, to work into the stratosphere, infect the water vapours that circle the globe, poision the oceans -- which subsequently have been used as many Major Cities' trash bins for many years. We cannot apply simplistic understandings to the environment because the environment is far too complex for basic models. We do not have a good enough understanding of our environment to make such simplsitic analogies as assuming that the since Artic dwellers don't have need for many of these chemicals, and might themselves have a 0 impact, that they are not affected.
At the end of the day, we all know better than to let man made toxins into the environment, yet we don't do anything about it.
Ryan Dicker - Renfrew, ON
said
Alistair McLaughlin
said
Peter
said
Karen
said
You might have a whole new take on it after that
goldylocks
said
So many people are so oblivious to all the chemicals being used in their everyday products, foods, etc., that or they just choose to stick their head in the sand.
I guess once again it comes down to the almighty dollar and people making money rather than peoples' health.
The world is not ours:
we borrow it from our children.
Gerald from Belleville
said
Jo
said
enviro scientist
said
Lynn S from Ontario
said
Jay from NB
said
Did everyone truly read between the lines??...
Kevin
said
AirController
said
2. To Not Convinced - It demonstrates that everything that goes into the environment is dispersed widely, and that includes toxins from burning and factories as well. By stating that you're "not convinced" are you implying there is a natural explanation for these effects?
Hal
said
At the time, one of the men from Natural Resources commented that androgenous deer were quite common in our area.
Since we're a fair distance from any sizeable human population, I suspect hormone disrupter chemicals have already reached epidemic proportions in our environment!
And Rachel, "future generations ..."? That's optimistic!
Not convinced
said
kate
said
James
said
TVic
said
Johnson Mapple
said
Rachel
said
Dave T
said