Canada in Afghanistan -   

1

Don Martin: Kandahar is over... but now what?

Canadian soldiers pay tribute to the fallen soldiers during a transfer of command authority ceremony in Kandahar airbase in Afghanistan, Thursday, July 7, 2011. (AP / Rafiq Maqbool)
Canadian soldiers pay tribute to the fallen soldiers during a transfer of command authority ceremony in Kandahar airbase in Afghanistan, Thursday, July 7, 2011. (AP / Rafiq Maqbool)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (13) Facebook   

Selected Comment

Let's get our people back home, and make sure they have something to keep them going when they get here. Be that a job, income, or good old security. We need to help each other, and it's ridiculous to think we don't need some military power.

Non-partisan

Don Martin: Kandahar is over... but now what?

talking about
Don Martin: Kandahar is over... but now what?

Date: Thursday Jul. 7, 2011 9:28 PM ET

With the Kandahar killing fields now officially clear of Canadian soldiers, a daunting military challenge lies ahead.

The new enemy is boot camp boredom, the recalibrated target is surplus staffing, the likely result is the return to a military funding decade of semi-darkness.

Now in the post-Afghanistan era, Canada's armed forces have lost their mojo -- and that's a very dangerous dangle in front of a government looking for easy deficit elimination routes.

In short, no bullets flying, no big bucks flowing.

It's already begun on internal departmental balance sheets.

What Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Walt Natynczyk has labelled the "transformation" of Canada's military is actually another word for "shrinkage" of staff inside his headquarters and perhaps the front line as well.

Cutting the fat at the department's headquarters is doable because there's been a rapid buildup of pencil-pushers which is difficult to justify.

But ripping the guts out of the front-line battalions would put Canada's military into a tailspin that might take another decade to recover in the event of another 9-11 attack.

Under the Conservatives, the military has regained its world-class stature in global confrontations, particularly with NATO partnerships.

It needs a year or two to regroup into prime fighting form with refurbished equipment, but it would be a shame for the gains of the last 10 years to render Canada a minor-power partner.

The Afghanistan mission, for all its success and potential failures, has lifted Canada from a passive, blue-helmeted, United Nations peacekeeping unit into a battlefield-hardened combat unit under an International Security Force flag.

It's the right time to end the mission, but it would be wrong to end Canada's reign as a respected middle power in global military peacemaking.

Comments are now closed for this story

Proud to be in uniform!
said

"Under the Conservatives, the military has regained its world-class stature in global confrontations, particularly with NATO partnerships." Where did this load of crap come from!!!!!! It was because of the Leadership of Gen(retired) Hillier that the forces are what they are today, at home and internationally. President Harper, don't use the good men and women of the Canadian Armed Forces in your ego stroking and position padding!! Its been very quiet in Ottawa since you gained your so called majority, the % say different. Don't ever compare the Govt's lack of accomplishments in the same arena as the soldiers, the military is far more respected in the world, than President Harper and his minions.


Carl
said

Good grief, Mr. Martin - do you actually have any reason to believe that the government will "rip the guts out of frontline batallions", or are you just engaging in wild conjecture and fear-mongering?


Proud Canadian
said

For a nation to have a standing military force that is capable of defending its own borders it needs current and maintained equipment, and above all its soldiers need to maintain their competency. The only effective way to maintain our soldiers skill and capability it to use it in some fashion. This doesn't mean that we head straight into another armed conflict for those bleeding heart pacifists out there. Doing peace time training can only take a fighting force so far. You only have to look at how prepared our forces were for the Afghan mission to see how letting our forces stagnate can effect its capability to assist with domestic emergencies or natural disasters.


JB in Ontario
said

Stay strong, stay proud. Canada's military has always been a formidable fighting force.


Sue
said

I am proud of our troops. I don't feel bad for them. They signed up for it. That's the lifestyle they want. I am not saying it is easy for them or their families but that is their job. I chose a different path for myself; my own choice. Good work out there. Hope you get back to your families and rest for a little bit. You sure deserve it.


Mike
said

ouifyg what do you think the point of a military is? We aren't there to give out hugs and kisses and play with puppies and kittens. The military must be ready to fight, and the unlike what the public thinks, the Military isn't trained to be peace keepers. Majority of training is focused on conducting combat operations, and some other tasks for the Three Block War, etc. Having a capable Military doesn't mean the goal is to invade a country in the near future, it is for our own defense and for any other missions that may come up in the future.


Down with the NWO
said

Now what ? We will likely get involved in the invasion of Libya that's coming soon.


Rita Baker, Dyers Bay.
said

Janis Mackey Frayer has done superb work for ctv. She deserves a medal!

Non-partisan
said

Let's get our people back home, and make sure they have something to keep them going when they get here. Be that a job, income, or good old security. We need to help each other, and it's ridiculous to think we don't need some military power.

W
said

I participated in a peace keeping mission as a MCpl and it was ridiculous to say the least. Cutting the fat at the headquarters level makes a lot of sense (especially if they intend to get rid of the civilian general and coloniel equivilants!), but the CF should take care not to trash the reserves. The reserves provided 20%-25% of each rotation and most of the Humint, Cimic and Psyops capabilities. Within government the CF may be an easy target, and similarly within DND the reserves are an easy target. If the CF wants to save money it would be to take procurment projects away from civilian employees that have never and will never use this equipment. Right now the CF is enduring the roll out of the "MSVS." A new non-deployable truck that is essentially useless. At $200,000.00 a pop (only $274 Million in total...) we now have a truck that has three ladders (eight foot deck requires a loading dock and is too high to exit and enter quickly), metal benches (very cold in the winter) and to top it off this truck cannot go off road. Don't get me wrong this truck would be great for civillian use and looks very nice but the tax payer got soaked for somthing that has very little domestic military use. The civillian empire at DND is where the government should be cutting coasts and saving money. The absolute best purchases made in recent history were the C-130J, C-17 Globemaster 3 and the Leopard two main battle tank. These were all battle field tested equipment which we new that we wanted and could use in conjunction with the rest of our equipment and the equipment our allies use.


Your boss
said

Mr. Don martin: Are you suggesting that we need a new war? Is it time to pack and go to Libya and protect our oil companies? It sounds like a good business plan....


Don Ballingall
said

I absolutely agree with your comment on not ripping the guts out of front line battalions, whether they be infantry, armour, artillary or support corps. The liberals did this in the 70,s and 80,s and damn near destroyed our armed forces and ruining morale amongst all of our services. The pay was so low we had servicemen on welfare and equpipment that was a joke. I urge the prime minister to maintain the level of competence and respect that has been garnered over the past decade and to trim the fat from the administration sector


ouifyg
said

Why on earth would we want our military to be "a battlefield-hardened combat unit"? Are we planning to invade a couple more third world countries maybe? Canada needs a good, strong defensive force and THAT'S ALL! Let's get out of the business of fighting wars half way across the world against countries that have done us no harm.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Riot police walk by a burning police car in downtown Toronto during anti G20 protests on Saturday, June 26, 2010. (Frank Gunn / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ontario police watchdog to release G20 summit report

More   7 Comments 7  

Steven Anderson reads a book and enjoys the sunshine on a bridge at Cedarvale Park in Toronto on Sunday, March 11, 2012. (Pawel Dwulit / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Hotter-than-usual temperatures expected this summer

More   5 Comments 5  

Most Talked about Stories

If there weren't so many people who hide their faces when committing violent acts then we wouldn't need a law forbidding masks. Unfortunately this is our society now. No one can hide their faces... we aren't special over here, violence has arrived and it is here to stay. Let's not kid ourselves. Violence just escalates to new levels. We've let this "hiding the faces" scenario go on far too long.

KC

Montreal bylaw could offer preview of federal mask ban